LPE 100 mm MAF

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

09-26-2006, 09:35 PM

Bink

TECH Addict

Thread Starter

Join Date: Jul 2002

Posts: 2,258

Likes: 3

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

LPE 100 mm MAF

Anyone used this on an NA application??

Positive results??

non-sponsor link removed by Admin

Reply Like

09-27-2006, 08:33 AM

firefighter

TECH Resident

Join Date: Oct 2004

Location: TAMPA by way of MIAMI!!!

Posts: 807

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

I thought that that was for Forced Induction apps. Some guys talked about it in the FI forums here and perf trucks.

Reply Like

09-27-2006, 01:18 PM

Bink

TECH Addict

Thread Starter

Join Date: Jul 2002

Posts: 2,258

Likes: 3

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

FI yes.
But, I was wondering if the 85 mm MAF was a restriction on the bigger bore na setups - seems like it would be with the heads available (360 -380ish)??

Reply Like

09-27-2006, 02:20 PM

RedHardSupra

TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (1)

Join Date: Sep 2003

Location: Laurel, MD

Posts: 1,904

Likes: 0

Received 1 Like on 1 Post

HumpinSS tested 85mm MAF vs straight pipe on his 430rwhp car, and dyno showed less than 0.5hp difference throughout the entire rev range, so i say it's not a bottleneck.

Reply Like

09-27-2006, 07:27 PM

Bink

TECH Addict

Thread Starter

Join Date: Jul 2002

Posts: 2,258

Likes: 3

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedHardSupra

HumpinSS tested 85mm MAF vs straight pipe on his 430rwhp car, and dyno showed less than 0.5hp difference throughout the entire rev range, so i say it's not a bottleneck.

Thanks, man!

I was thinking more along the lines of total airflow through the enlarged intake (4" and 100mm cs MAF) feeding a 550-600 rwhp biggie sized block.

Reply Like

09-28-2006, 01:46 AM

Nate_Taufer

Banned

iTrader: (1)

Join Date: Nov 2004

Location: North of Seattle

Posts: 2,057

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedHardSupra

HumpinSS tested 85mm MAF vs straight pipe on his 430rwhp car, and dyno showed less than 0.5hp difference throughout the entire rev range, so i say it's not a bottleneck.

I went with a straight piece of pipe over the stock maf and gained 7 rwhp on the same dyno but different day. I am around 420 rwhp cam only. My butt dyno couldn't tell the difference.

Nate

Reply Like

10-01-2006, 08:53 PM

John B

Moderator

iTrader: (10)

Join Date: Nov 2001

Location: Phoenix, AZ

Posts: 3,248

Likes: 9

Received 13 Likes on 6 Posts

Quote:

Anyone used this on an NA application??

Positive results??

I just ordered one for my LS7 to replace the 85mm MAF so we'll see!

Reply Like

Trending Topics

1967 Cougar Godzilla ZF 8HP70 swap

17

372
What gear ratio are you running with your M6 turbo combo?

22

439
315 blowout on the highway

11

253
VIDEO Build Thread - Turbo 5.3 - FD RX-7

12

790
Ram Air Hood

9

177

10-01-2006, 09:34 PM

Pro Mouse

TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (15)

Join Date: Jul 2002

Location: Shelby Twp. Mich

Posts: 1,441

Likes: 0

Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Quote:

Originally Posted by John B

I just ordered one for my LS7 to replace the 85mm MAF so we'll see!

Interesting, please let know

Reply Like

10-02-2006, 09:37 AM

Katech_Jason

LS1TECH Sponsor

iTrader: (19)

Join Date: Sep 2005

Posts: 2,939

Likes: 0

Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

I'm doing an A-B test on the chassis dyno soon. I'll post the results.

Reply Like

10-02-2006, 12:44 PM

#10

slt200mph

TECH Senior Member

iTrader: (42)

Join Date: Jul 2003

Location: HOT'LANA, GAWJA

Posts: 7,067

Likes: 0

Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by Katech

I'm doing an A-B test on the chassis dyno soon. I'll post the results.

Hay Jason it was nice to finally meet you .. you guys were "good neighbors" at the Petit Le Mans.. that was a very nice car and you had some nice parts too ...

Steve

Reply Like

10-02-2006, 01:54 PM

#11

Katech_Jason

LS1TECH Sponsor

iTrader: (19)

Join Date: Sep 2005

Posts: 2,939

Likes: 0

Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by slt200mph

Hay Jason it was nice to finally meet you .. you guys were "good neighbors" at the Petit Le Mans.. that was a very nice car and you had some nice parts too ...

Steve

Thanks, you too.

Reply Like

10-02-2006, 03:05 PM

#12

Pro Mouse

TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (15)

Join Date: Jul 2002

Location: Shelby Twp. Mich

Posts: 1,441

Likes: 0

Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Quote:

Originally Posted by Katech

I'm doing an A-B test on the chassis dyno soon. I'll post the results.

That would be sweet Jason ,Thanks

Last edited by Pro Mouse; 10-02-2006 at 10:15 PM.

Reply Like

10-02-2006, 05:44 PM

#13

98blackSS

TECH Resident

Join Date: Dec 2001

Location: Lexington Park, MD

Posts: 922

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

I'm very interested to hear what the results are from both John and Jason. I'm on the fence on ordering one for the LS7..

Reply Like

10-02-2006, 06:26 PM

#14

Bink

TECH Addict

Thread Starter

Join Date: Jul 2002

Posts: 2,258

Likes: 3

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by John B

I just ordered one for my LS7 to replace the 85mm MAF so we'll see!

Thanks John.=!! Let us know.

Reply Like

10-02-2006, 09:37 PM

#15

John B

Moderator

iTrader: (10)

Join Date: Nov 2001

Location: Phoenix, AZ

Posts: 3,248

Likes: 9

Received 13 Likes on 6 Posts

Quote:

Thanks John.=!! Let us know.

Will do since I will also be doing a back to back test. In addition, I will be trying out one of Jeremy Formato's ported LS7 intakes (just sent him a new core Friday). I will also be doing some dyno tuning to see if I can crack 510-520RWHP on a stock motor since I haven't done anything with my timing or A/F curves yet. If this doesn't get it then I might also step up to the 96mm TB!

Reply Like