Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

Few Goodies = More HP/TQ

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-02-2009, 10:45 AM
  #1  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (39)
 
TORCHD 02 TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,883
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Talking Few Goodies = More HP/TQ

i added some goodies to my car and got it redynoed.

my b4 numbers were 404/375 SAE corrected: 415/378
those numbers were with my cam, TDs, P&P TB, 160 T-stat, Lid

My new numbers are: 415/382 SAE corrected: 419/385
New goodies are 85mm MAF, 85mm Lid, 42# Ford Green Top Injectors, Custom Kooks O/R Y, FM Merge and GMMG c/b and all the above mods.
Old 05-02-2009, 10:56 AM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
TXZ28LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Classified
Posts: 6,164
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

nice gains man!!
Old 05-02-2009, 02:29 PM
  #3  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Johnnystock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,675
Received 38 Likes on 25 Posts

Default

5hp/7tq, its marginal but you gained!!

Were you tired of your TDs?
Old 05-02-2009, 02:44 PM
  #4  
registered user
iTrader: (3)
 
ScreaminRedZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,940
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

^That's what I was thinking.
Old 05-02-2009, 10:02 PM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (39)
 
TORCHD 02 TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,883
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Johnnystock
5hp/7tq, its marginal but you gained!!

Were you tired of your TDs?
Where are you gettign those numbers from

Before the mods i was 404/375... After the new mods i was 415/382..

If my math is correct that is a gain of 11 RWHP and 7 RWTQ

My TDs hung to low. Went with a custom exhasut. And it sucked that my cutout decided not to work that day
Old 05-02-2009, 10:13 PM
  #6  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Rob98LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TORCHD 02 TA
Where are you gettign those numbers from

Before the mods i was 404/375... After the new mods i was 415/382..

If my math is correct that is a gain of 11 RWHP and 7 RWTQ

My TDs hung to low. Went with a custom exhasut. And it sucked that my cutout decided not to work that day
Looks like it's just reference to the difference between the SAE numbers... even so its nice to see a gain switching back to a Y-pipe setup vs. TDs.
Nice numbers.
Old 05-02-2009, 10:19 PM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (39)
 
TORCHD 02 TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,883
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rob98LS1
Looks like it's just reference to the difference between the SAE numbers... even so its nice to see a gain switching back to a Y-pipe setup vs. TDs.
Nice numbers.
Yeah i caught that after i posted. But i never go off corrected numbers. I go with what the dyno gives me at that time
Old 05-02-2009, 10:22 PM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (39)
 
TORCHD 02 TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,883
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I forgot to add these numbers are on a MUSTANG Dyno too `
Old 05-02-2009, 10:47 PM
  #9  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Rob98LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TORCHD 02 TA
I forgot to add these numbers are on a MUSTANG Dyno too `
Ya I figured you caught it afterwards, but nice gains. I've followed the progress on your car, I remember when you installed the flowmaster 10-series I think it was trying to find something you liked, sounded good then, and sounded even better after the cam swap. Good numbers!

- Rob
Old 05-03-2009, 06:51 AM
  #10  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Johnnystock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,675
Received 38 Likes on 25 Posts

Default

Yeah I was checking the corrected numbers...either way, looks good to me...dyno mustang are harsch too, so your car must be strong!!
Old 05-03-2009, 09:47 AM
  #11  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
SweetS10V8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TORCHD 02 TA
But i never go off corrected numbers. I go with what the dyno gives me at that time
You do things the wrong way intentionally? Uncorrected number are 100% useless, especially since your trying to compare two different occasions...

If you just want to feel good post up STP corrected numbers, which would be 435/400.
Old 05-03-2009, 11:55 AM
  #12  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
chrs1313's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,697
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SweetS10V8
You do things the wrong way intentionally? Uncorrected number are 100% useless, especially since your trying to compare two different occasions...

If you just want to feel good post up STP corrected numbers, which would be 435/400.
jonas he is right, go by SAE numbers that is the best option...but dyno numbers mean nothing really...i lost 13rwhp and 21rwtq going to my ported 92 but gained 1mph at the track with slightly worse DA...

i only put down 409rwhp 373wtq on dynojet just use it as a tool...plus you would have gained another 5hp or so for the cutout cause you have a good exhaust not 20hp like me over my stock z28 muffler lol...
Old 05-03-2009, 10:14 PM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (39)
 
TORCHD 02 TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,883
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SweetS10V8
You do things the wrong way intentionally? Uncorrected number are 100% useless, especially since your trying to compare two different occasions...

If you just want to feel good post up STP corrected numbers, which would be 435/400.
How did you get 435/400?

My SAE corrected numbers were 419/385.. Sorry for asking a dumb question
Old 05-03-2009, 10:15 PM
  #14  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (39)
 
TORCHD 02 TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,883
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chrs1313
jonas he is right, go by SAE numbers that is the best option...but dyno numbers mean nothing really...i lost 13rwhp and 21rwtq going to my ported 92 but gained 1mph at the track with slightly worse DA...

i only put down 409rwhp 373wtq on dynojet just use it as a tool...plus you would have gained another 5hp or so for the cutout cause you have a good exhaust not 20hp like me over my stock z28 muffler lol...
Kind of sucks that my cut-out decided not to work that day would have been a tad higher
Old 05-04-2009, 09:01 PM
  #15  
Launching!
 
Ryan L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

:look:
Old 05-04-2009, 09:08 PM
  #16  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (39)
 
TORCHD 02 TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,883
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ryan L
:look:
Go back to MW
Old 05-04-2009, 10:32 PM
  #17  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
SweetS10V8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TORCHD 02 TA
How did you get 435/400?

My SAE corrected numbers were 419/385.. Sorry for asking a dumb question
Different correction factor, heres my simple answer.

Most dyno places and magazines use STP (Standard temp and pressure) as a correction factor because it corrects as if the air is 60*F and the Baro is higher. It basically makes your number 4% than SAE by using STP as your correction factor instead. I took your SAE number and multiplied them by 1.04 to get STP numbers.

Whereas SAE correction factor corrects to a more reasonable 77*F and less of a baro pressure, which is more real world.
Old 05-05-2009, 09:11 AM
  #18  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (39)
 
TORCHD 02 TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,883
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SweetS10V8
Different correction factor, heres my simple answer.

Most dyno places and magazines use STP (Standard temp and pressure) as a correction factor because it corrects as if the air is 60*F and the Baro is higher. It basically makes your number 4% than SAE by using STP as your correction factor instead. I took your SAE number and multiplied them by 1.04 to get STP numbers.

Whereas SAE correction factor corrects to a more reasonable 77*F and less of a baro pressure, which is more real world.
I still like to use the numbers that car generated thru the dyno. Not the corrected ones.

The reason i say that is b/c the was not run on the perfect day, not all conditions were on par. So that is why i tell them the regualr numbers and not the SAE corrected ones...




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:34 AM.