Paging Wizeass
07-30-2009, 10:59 AM
#1
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: DFW
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Paging Wizeass What’s up with your car? last I read, you fixed your fuel pump issues. Car is pilled up now. When are we gonna see some 5’s out of that heap? You’ve got a nice sig now, so lets see some ET’s to back it up.
:beer:
:beer:
07-30-2009, 06:07 PM
#4
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: by my computer
Posts: 2,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Jerm,
I will take you up on that..... my 636rw setup vs your turbo car..... $200.00 lock it in!
(lol)
remember the old **** talkin thread with your terminator and my slow *** piece of **** 
I will take you up on that..... my 636rw setup vs your turbo car..... $200.00 lock it in!
(lol)
remember the old **** talkin thread with your terminator and my slow *** piece of ****
07-30-2009, 06:31 PM
#5
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: by my computer
Posts: 2,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Strackcar what what!
Thanks to the boys at Real Performance Motorsports for putting together a hell of a car....
07-30-2009, 09:04 PM
#6
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Alvarado, Texas
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Man, my old pos terminator was pretty fun, but it was wierd, you would think back then making 490rwhp you could be damn near beat anything on the street. I always had problems with heads/cam ls1's staying door to door with me. That would always irratate me.
I still remember the time JP sprayed his t/a next to me, that had to have been the fastest car I have ever seen roll out. It was like I put my crap in reverse and nailed the throttle.
JP, when you plan on having it done? Who's doing the work?
07-31-2009, 03:10 AM
#7
took that bitch to the Arm Drop Live last week at Kennedale. Talk to the guys from Rich's show... they were pretty cool. They let me in late, I got there after 7:30 and time trails started at 2:00 or so. I was the last car and instead of 3 passes I got 1 straight off the street. No cool down as much as I would have liked. Ran a 7.27 @ 94mph on motor (the shop tried to get there in time {trailored the shop car from Lewisville} but was turned away at the gate. I got there just in time before the end of qualifying and told em I would pay my 55 bucks just to make some passes during the event. They let me in. Needless to say I finished 3rd in the 7 second NA class out of 16 cars hotlapped from driving the car 50-60 miles. I was one of the only cars likely driven to the track in the class.....
Strackcar what what!
Thanks to the boys at Real Performance Motorsports for putting together a hell of a car....
Strackcar what what!
Thanks to the boys at Real Performance Motorsports for putting together a hell of a car....
i drive my **** to the track every time and go faster with overdrive
Trending Topics
07-31-2009, 08:35 AM
#8
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: DFW
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Deal! Of course from a roll. I hope my crap holds together with 20psi, probably what it's going to take.
Man, my old pos terminator was pretty fun, but it was wierd, you would think back then making 490rwhp you could be damn near beat anything on the street. I always had problems with heads/cam ls1's staying door to door with me. That would always irratate me.
I still remember the time JP sprayed his t/a next to me, that had to have been the fastest car I have ever seen roll out. It was like I put my crap in reverse and nailed the throttle.
JP, when you plan on having it done? Who's doing the work?
Man, my old pos terminator was pretty fun, but it was wierd, you would think back then making 490rwhp you could be damn near beat anything on the street. I always had problems with heads/cam ls1's staying door to door with me. That would always irratate me.
I still remember the time JP sprayed his t/a next to me, that had to have been the fastest car I have ever seen roll out. It was like I put my crap in reverse and nailed the throttle.
JP, when you plan on having it done? Who's doing the work?
Me you and mellow went 3 wide. We were going around a slight curve so I went wide right incase I lost traction on the shifts. When I leave the camera view I’m a car out and then when I get back into the camera view I’m 8 cars out. lmao.
Ya’ll Arlington folks are crazy! We went 3-4 wide in 2 waves.
The turbo will be getting finished this winter. Should be out this spring I’ll be running on stock heads like you for a little bit.
07-31-2009, 08:41 AM
#9
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: by my computer
Posts: 2,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lol. that video is still around. I think its on streetfire or something. I used to have it book marked.
Me you and mellow went 3 wide. We were going around a slight curve so I went wide right incase I lost traction on the shifts. When I leave the camera view I’m a car out and then when I get back into the camera view I’m 8 cars out. lmao.
Ya’ll Arlington folks are crazy! We went 3-4 wide in 2 waves.
The turbo will be getting finished this winter. Should be out this spring I’ll be running on stock heads like you for a little bit.
Me you and mellow went 3 wide. We were going around a slight curve so I went wide right incase I lost traction on the shifts. When I leave the camera view I’m a car out and then when I get back into the camera view I’m 8 cars out. lmao.
Ya’ll Arlington folks are crazy! We went 3-4 wide in 2 waves.
The turbo will be getting finished this winter. Should be out this spring I’ll be running on stock heads like you for a little bit.
Heads are only needed if you are lifting them. Stock heads work fine on boost and nitrous.
07-31-2009, 09:44 AM
#12
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: by my computer
Posts: 2,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
heads dont mean as much with FI or nitrous as they do natural aspiration since you are forcing air. Add more bottle or more juice folks.
My heads are ported GM castings. Honestly the intake port has very little work on it.
My heads are ported GM castings. Honestly the intake port has very little work on it.
07-31-2009, 10:17 AM
#13
TECH Addict
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Nevada, TX
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
07-31-2009, 10:43 AM
#15
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In Christmas Vacation, the family is gathered around the table, eating turkey. Clark comments that they saw Santa. Eddie looks up from his plate and says "You serious Clark?"
You serious Stewie?
07-31-2009, 11:00 AM
#17
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: by my computer
Posts: 2,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
if you are Forcing or adding a compressed air into an engine the argument on whether the cylinder head is efficient is of less importance. Not saying it doesnt make a difference, just that heads will make a much greater difference on an NA motor and heads being ported wont be as big an issue on a boosted or juiced engine.
My point was... why use stock heads as an excuse? Yall sound like me!
07-31-2009, 11:41 AM
#18
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: DFW
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
common sense.....
if you are Forcing or adding a compressed air into an engine the argument on whether the cylinder head is efficient is of less importance. Not saying it doesnt make a difference, just that heads will make a much greater difference on an NA motor and heads being ported wont be as big an issue on a boosted or juiced engine.
My point was... why use stock heads as an excuse? Yall sound like me!
if you are Forcing or adding a compressed air into an engine the argument on whether the cylinder head is efficient is of less importance. Not saying it doesnt make a difference, just that heads will make a much greater difference on an NA motor and heads being ported wont be as big an issue on a boosted or juiced engine.
My point was... why use stock heads as an excuse? Yall sound like me!
You’re an idiot Mikey if you can’t grasp that concept.
07-31-2009, 12:07 PM
#19
12 Second Club
iTrader: (44)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
what concept is he not grasping?
if a head has to move air on its own it needs to be as efficient as possible...everyone knows that...on a N/A motor the better the heads the more power you can make.
if it has a hairdryer ramming it down its throat it doesn't matter how big the ports are the air is going in it....end of discussion...all you have to do to get more power out of a turbo car is turn the boost up....you can have the shittiest heads ever on a turbo car and still make as much power as a N/A car with good heads...
and like Mike said, better heads on either setup will make a difference...but he's saying a N/A motor with **** heads will lose more than a turbo car with those same heads...make sense??
The turbo makes up for the heads being inefficient.
if a head has to move air on its own it needs to be as efficient as possible...everyone knows that...on a N/A motor the better the heads the more power you can make.
if it has a hairdryer ramming it down its throat it doesn't matter how big the ports are the air is going in it....end of discussion...all you have to do to get more power out of a turbo car is turn the boost up....you can have the shittiest heads ever on a turbo car and still make as much power as a N/A car with good heads...
and like Mike said, better heads on either setup will make a difference...but he's saying a N/A motor with **** heads will lose more than a turbo car with those same heads...make sense??
The turbo makes up for the heads being inefficient.
