Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

on3 76mm turbo on lq4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-01-2012, 11:01 AM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
mechanix565's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Pawtucket, RI
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default on3 76mm turbo on lq4

Anyone ever.look into these turbo's.the mustang.guys love them. Like the price but are.they capable of flowing up to 600 whp? Motor is a stock lq4 with.a.tu1 cam and ported 317 heads
Old 02-01-2012, 11:05 AM
  #2  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
mechanix565's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Pawtucket, RI
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Cold Side:

Compressor Wheel 76mm .80 a/r 4” Inlet and 2.5” Compressor Outlet Inducer- 76.71mm Exducer- 102.36mm

Exhaust Side:

Exhaust Housing T-4 Flanged Divided Available in 2 A/R sizes - .68 or .81 3.0" Vband outlet Inducer- 74.5mm Exducer- 60.56mm
Old 02-01-2012, 11:34 AM
  #3  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
DavidPHumes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

https://ls1tech.com/forums/forced-in...on3-turbo.html

Old 02-01-2012, 02:55 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
 
tripblackls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: lancaster,ca
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

The exhaust turbine is a Lil small for a 6.0 , if you Do get one , call them and ask for the .96 housing or larger if possible
Old 02-01-2012, 03:57 PM
  #5  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
stangtrader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: PNW
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

well i have one and have yet to use it on my 6.0,waiting for tax money next month.i may sell mine and upgrade to a bw s475. i think the on3 may have some backpressure issues
on a 6.0.,but i think it will spool real fast but i dont want to be limited because of backpressure
Old 02-01-2012, 08:46 PM
  #6  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
mechanix565's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Pawtucket, RI
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

how would spool times be if i ran two of them considering two of them is still cheaper than a single s475.. lol plus i have plenty of room for twins lol
Old 02-01-2012, 09:37 PM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (127)
 
NemeSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 6,886
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mechanix565
how would spool times be if i ran two of them considering two of them is still cheaper than a single s475.. lol plus i have plenty of room for twins lol
Thats a loaded question. Too many variables. CI, SCR, manifold design,metal construction.etc.
Old 02-01-2012, 11:35 PM
  #8  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
mechanix565's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Pawtucket, RI
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

more of looking for a ballpark if its gonna be super laggy or spool quick. Stock Lq4, stock truck intake, ported 317's, 1 7/8 tubular manifolds, TU1 cam, dual 3in down pipes off each turbo, 80# injectors. my stall is 3500 im really just looking for a nasty street setup that gives me alot of room to grow because ive got a forged bottom end in the works for later on. i want a setup that can support 700 max for when i get the next motor this one will be lucky to see 550 but i want to know i can do better. truck is AWD so i want a nasty launch thats why im interested in spool times and peak boost.
Old 02-02-2012, 12:54 AM
  #9  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
stangtrader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: PNW
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I had two of them and tossed the twins idea around but probly would be pretty laggy. So opted not to.I would think a s475 is your best bet. It wouldn't be much more at all versus two on3 t76,plus it will support your goals. Just my .02
Old 02-02-2012, 01:02 AM
  #10  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
mechanix565's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Pawtucket, RI
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

well my orginal intensions were single s475

Turbo Specs:
Compressor Inlet - 5 Inch
Compressor Wheel Inducer/Exducer - 75 x 100mm with ETT
Turbine Wheel Inducer/Exducer - 96 x 87mm
Turbine Outlet - 5 Inch V-Band
Turbine Inlet - T6 Divided
Turbine A/R - 1.32
Optional 1.10 A/R available - call/Email for more info
Horsepower Rating - 500-1050

but i was told on stock heads it couldnt flow 600hp thats why i looked into twins. i love these turbos and would really like to use it but i just want to make sure its the best option.
Old 02-02-2012, 06:55 AM
  #11  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Sarg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I would think if you had a single s475 it would eat a single on3 76mm alive and if you step up to the 87mm or 96mm turbine it will flow plenty for 600+ hp.

That being said, I wanted twins on my set up and going the budget route on this swap till I see how it does. I went with twin 70mm On3 turbos for my 5.3 WRX swap.
Old 03-06-2012, 08:57 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
T76s10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: superior, wi
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Listen to sarg. He's got his **** on lock
Old 03-07-2012, 05:52 AM
  #13  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Sarg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

We have since actually changed things around. We are putting the twin 70mm on a 5.1 stroker motor and going with a single 80mm Borg with a 96mm turbine and a 1.32 T6 housing. The hope is that if the 80 works well, we will step up to an 88 or 91mm wheel later.



Quick Reply: on3 76mm turbo on lq4



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:39 PM.