Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

question about 5.3l head flow.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-24-2013, 01:07 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
KingPin1094's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default question about 5.3l head flow.

I got these 5.3L heads for free, they have had some port work done. Im curious if anyone got these heads to flow ~320cfm? the best i have seen is ~300cfm. Just asking if it is possible, has it been done?

If not ill probably just sell them and get PRC stage 3 ls6 heads or 243 heads and have my head guy make them equal to PRC stage 3 ls6 heads.
Old 03-24-2013, 01:21 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
HCI2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Not sure about the flow, but for free i'd just go with it lol. I have those heads and they work pretty damn good for what they are...regardless on peak flow numbers
Old 03-24-2013, 01:32 PM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
KingPin1094's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by HCI2000SS
Not sure about the flow, but for free i'd just go with it lol. I have those heads and they work pretty damn good for what they are...regardless on peak flow numbers
well, i bought the car and it had 440whp. The car has a trashed bottom end so im going to build a forged 408. im shooting for 500whp. Im gonna redo the bottom end, install a different cam. I just dont think the heads will support my goals. but im not an expert so i created this post.
Old 03-24-2013, 01:39 PM
  #4  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
Dragframe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: wyoming @ 7000 DA...
Posts: 2,331
Received 64 Likes on 54 Posts

Default

Your definitely going to need better heads...
Old 03-24-2013, 02:15 PM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
HCI2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Oh yeah if you want 500 rwhp I can see the need for better heads then lol
Old 03-24-2013, 06:54 PM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
 
garygnu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,446
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

stage 3 heads usually have big valves ment for 4" bores.most stage 1 heads are ported and have stock valves, and make 7 hp less.the tsp 5.3 ported heads are a good deal for the money.
Old 03-24-2013, 07:06 PM
  #7  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
egod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the 5.3s are nice units cause they have a smaller combustion chamber to increase CR, they can be ported to flow rather well too especially with a good valve job. But 500 rwhp would be much easier with higher flowing heads especially with a 4 inch bore, you would want heads/chambers designed for the bigger bore to give better flame travel
Old 03-24-2013, 08:55 PM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
KingPin1094's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Im starting to look into Ls3 heads, good idea?
Old 03-24-2013, 09:20 PM
  #9  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
egod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

They will certainly have great flow numbers, but keep in mind that they have square ports so you will have to replace the intake and get a cam to match the flow numbers with respect to their lift. On a 408 you can go either way with cathedral ports or square. Although the ls3 has higher raw flow numbers, whats more important is air velocity which is what the cathedral ports are great at. There was an article in gm high tech, as long as the cam is matched correctly they performed almost the same. If you plan on going really big in the future the square bore will have more potential. But if you plan on staying under 700 HP then keep to the cathedral because the component cost is usually cheaper.
Old 03-24-2013, 09:35 PM
  #10  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
KingPin1094's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by egod
They will certainly have great flow numbers, but keep in mind that they have square ports so you will have to replace the intake and get a cam to match the flow numbers with respect to their lift. On a 408 you can go either way with cathedral ports or square. Although the ls3 has higher raw flow numbers, whats more important is air velocity which is what the cathedral ports are great at. There was an article in gm high tech, as long as the cam is matched correctly they performed almost the same. If you plan on going really big in the future the square bore will have more potential. But if you plan on staying under 700 HP then keep to the cathedral because the component cost is usually cheaper.
I was planning on replacing the cam anyway, and i figured i could sell my FAST 92 for a ported LS3. Eventually (stress on eventually) id like to move to a twin turbo setup and make ridiculous power, but thats not of importance now. I was reading a thread from 2007 about l92 heads on a 408. It seemed then the major cam grinders were still trying to work out the best combo for the square port. Have we/most people/ the experts figured out what exactly suits the engines.
Old 03-24-2013, 09:54 PM
  #11  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
egod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you plan on running boost then it would matter even less. But ultimately the higher flow number will have more potential. I would do it once and do it right if that is where you want to end up eventually. Do you plan on replacing the pistons later or are you build a low compression 408 from the get go?
Old 03-24-2013, 10:15 PM
  #12  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
KingPin1094's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by egod
If you plan on running boost then it would matter even less. But ultimately the higher flow number will have more potential. I would do it once and do it right if that is where you want to end up eventually. Do you plan on replacing the pistons later or are you build a low compression 408 from the get go?
really my future plans are inconsequential to what im doing now, i may even change blocks then. Ive been doing some research and ive seen that the LS3 top end puts the power range a bit higher. And in my experience that would lower fuel economy. If i use 243 heads and get a higher LSA cam i could keep the power down a little lower and maybe get more mpg out of the car.
Old 03-24-2013, 10:32 PM
  #13  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
egod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

it sounds like you already have your answer then. If your future plans aren't really a concern then stick with the cathedral ports and keep your intake.
Old 03-24-2013, 10:39 PM
  #14  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
KingPin1094's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by egod
it sounds like you already have your answer then. If your future plans aren't really a concern then stick with the cathedral ports and keep your intake.
i think thats what i want to do, but i just wanted to research all aspects before i chose my path. see what will be best and do what im looking for.



Quick Reply: question about 5.3l head flow.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:17 PM.