Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

760/722 Magna Charger?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-31-2006, 05:01 PM
  #1  
blownerator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
BlownChevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1986
Location: Chatsworth, CA
Posts: 18,698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 760/722 Magna Charger?

Yeah that's right! 760 HP and 722 TQ As tested by Duttweiler Performance this afternoon.

Here is the set up:

LS2 402
10.8:1
110 octane
MP122H Beta
Dart 225 out of the box
Crane 236/246 @ 50 114
SCAT Rotating Assembly
UMI 90MM TB
Speed Density W/ Big Stuff


The Video Right Click Save As

Last edited by BlownChevy; 01-31-2006 at 05:26 PM.
Old 01-31-2006, 05:17 PM
  #2  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,597
Received 1,736 Likes on 1,297 Posts

Default

nobody wanted to listen to me that 1 could make over 600rwhp...and this one did WAY more.....very sick setup!congrats!!thats badass!
Old 01-31-2006, 05:32 PM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (11)
 
Jake the SSnake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Iowa
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Awesome!!!!!!!! I think I might have to look in to one of those for my s10
Old 01-31-2006, 06:16 PM
  #4  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (8)
 
quicksilverado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Marietta, Ga.
Posts: 3,899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ddnspider
nobody wanted to listen to me that 1 could make over 600rwhp...and this one did WAY more.....very sick setup!congrats!!thats badass!
The #s there are crank hp, which would be over 600rwhp. Keep in mind this is with a 122 and not the 112. Still pretty good #s.
Old 01-31-2006, 06:31 PM
  #5  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
wildta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Burlington, Ont. / North Van B.C.
Posts: 490
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

What would the engine make without the 110 octane ?

Also what do you think the engine would make without magna ?

Do you have any pictures of the set up .


Nice numbers by the way !!!
Old 01-31-2006, 06:37 PM
  #6  
Adkoonerstrator
iTrader: (4)
 
XLR8NSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Deep in the seedy underworld of Koonerville
Posts: 21,420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by wildta
Also what do you think the engine would make without magna ?
Over on the truck site he mentioned(going off of memory) that the engine made 560hp naturally aspirated. I don't know if that was with the same oct or whatever else but, it sounded like the only difference was no blower/blower.
Old 01-31-2006, 11:00 PM
  #7  
blownerator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
BlownChevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1986
Location: Chatsworth, CA
Posts: 18,698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by XLR8NSS
Over on the truck site he mentioned(going off of memory) that the engine made 560hp naturally aspirated. I don't know if that was with the same oct or whatever else but, it sounded like the only difference was no blower/blower.
THat is correct. N/A some octane made 559.8.
Old 01-31-2006, 11:22 PM
  #8  
what a rush!
iTrader: (8)
 
moregrip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 17,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BlownChevy
THat is correct. N/A some octane made 559.8.
I can live with a nice 200hp gain
Old 01-31-2006, 11:41 PM
  #9  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
NumberOneSled's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Why so much compression?
Old 02-01-2006, 12:10 AM
  #10  
10 Second Club
 
Dbluegoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: slocala
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

when is this 122 supposed to be available? Will it work on ls1's?
Old 02-01-2006, 12:10 AM
  #11  
Tribe Shaman
iTrader: (4)
 
PappyDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Blown let me see the specs on that cam crane, i'm going to build another 6.0.
Old 02-01-2006, 01:09 AM
  #12  
what a rush!
iTrader: (8)
 
moregrip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 17,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NumberOneSled
Why so much compression?
the answer is in here:

Originally Posted by BlownChevy
Actually the MP122H (Beta) is close to the same as the blower you mention. This is an Eaton rotating group with a Magnuson designed rotor housing, this housing is still in Beta testing for efficiency and power output. I am not sure when the public will see production.

As for the "110 Octane"......This motor was set up for some testing with an unrelated performance part, Duttweiler decided to test the MP122H (Beta) on the engine while waiting for some other parts to show up. This was tested in these conditions because that is what was there. I suspect that on pump gas this motor would be a solid 700 hp set up no questions asked. You all should know that this new supercharger is not even close to being finished in the design and testing and is already making preliminary numbers that will SHATTER the competition in the same settings. Sooner or later you will have the reliability of the Magnuson/Eaton supercharger with the power output of what was once considered the BIG DOGS. Sorry boys, better get back to the drawing board, Magnuson is coming after you. Let me reiterate, this will be an exciting year for Magnuson Products Inc. and Eaton.
Old 02-01-2006, 01:23 AM
  #13  
Restricted User
iTrader: (9)
 
NOSjohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,692
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Kenny is da' man !
Old 02-01-2006, 12:28 PM
  #14  
blownerator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
BlownChevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1986
Location: Chatsworth, CA
Posts: 18,698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NOSjohn
Kenny is da' man !

Yes he is!
Old 02-04-2006, 04:35 PM
  #15  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (38)
 
Nine Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 32,987
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

Those are promising results. Hopefully the 122 will fit right onto the 112 intake manifold, making this an easy upgrade for Magna owners down the road...

Tony
Old 02-05-2006, 01:56 PM
  #16  
TECH Addict
 
chuntington101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,866
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

its not a straight swap. the bolt holes are diffrent.

Chris.



Quick Reply: 760/722 Magna Charger?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:36 PM.