New LS1 Owners - Newbie Tech Basic Technical Questions & Advice
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

what would I run

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-31-2006, 08:33 AM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
ws649er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default what would I run

plz don't say "take it to the track," b/c i'm going to eventually but i've just been really busy with school lately..with that said, what do you guys think a 2.73'd A4, 98 trans am would run in the 1/4 with a cutout, filter and lid on new street tires (at close to sea level)? thanks. i'll let you kno my times when i do finally make it up there.
Old 10-31-2006, 08:53 AM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (15)
 
thunderstruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: effingham, il
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i would guess 13.4-13.6 w/ a 2.0 60' time
Old 10-31-2006, 09:57 AM
  #3  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (31)
 
bjamick's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Birmingham AL.
Posts: 4,218
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

ya id say prob 13.8 just bc of the 2.73's are horrible and i also say 2.2 60' time.
Old 10-31-2006, 02:05 PM
  #4  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
ws649er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bjamick
ya id say prob 13.8 just bc of the 2.73's are horrible and i also say 2.2 60' time.
as horrible as 2.73's are, isn't 13.8 more typical of a bone stock time for those?
Old 10-31-2006, 03:43 PM
  #5  
TECH Resident
 
jpat1023's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 932
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ws649er
as horrible as 2.73's are, isn't 13.8 more typical of a bone stock time for those?
Yes, 13.8 is a shitty time even for a bone stock car.

I say 13.3 w/ a 2.0 60'. Good Luck!
Old 10-31-2006, 06:35 PM
  #6  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
 
99SSinOC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 391
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

13.2-13.5 @ 103 w/ 2.1 60 ft.
Old 10-31-2006, 06:51 PM
  #7  
On The Tree
 
AllShowNoGo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Kimberly, WI
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Bone stock i ran a 13.8 @ 101 w/ a 2.2 60' Also it was the hottest and most humid day of the year. So i think you should be atleast 13.5 or quicker. But remember, its all in the 60'.
Old 10-31-2006, 06:58 PM
  #8  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
'Trust''s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Eternity
Posts: 7,975
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

13.4-13.5 101ish. Sea level will help you out quite a bit.. but a stock A4 won't. But thats where the modding comes into play.
Old 10-31-2006, 07:41 PM
  #9  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
ws649er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

you think a 3400 stall has any chance of putting me into the 12's? i'm debating between that and some new gears next.
Old 10-31-2006, 07:44 PM
  #10  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
black00TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 942
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

your about 13.5 right now with around 2.0 60ft and trapin around 104mph

a 3400 stall with some drag radials will put you into the 12's almost certainly imho.
Old 11-01-2006, 06:28 PM
  #11  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
 
5_02ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default 14.50@98mph Stock

Ok I Bought The Car Changed The Oil Went To The Track Mine Is Also A 98 A4 Then It Had 2.73s They Suck By The Way I Race At Bristol Dragway In Tn Its Not Even Close To Sea Level I Ran 2 14.70s And Let The Car Cool Off And Ran A 14.50 My 60ft Was A 2.10 The Car Was In Bad Need Of A Tune Up Also. Id Guess 13.90 To14.20 You Should Run Somthin Around That

98ta A4
3.73s
Pp3
Slp Lid
K&n
Ported Maf&tb
Tb Bypass
Fra
Flowmaster Catback
Old 11-01-2006, 09:16 PM
  #12  
On The Tree
 
AllShowNoGo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Kimberly, WI
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

14.70??? lol my brothers 1 ton dually could run with you. You'll for sure be in the 13's if you hit 14's sell that car and buy a new one.
Old 11-02-2006, 07:26 AM
  #13  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (15)
 
thunderstruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: effingham, il
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ws649er
you think a 3400 stall has any chance of putting me into the 12's? i'm debating between that and some new gears next.
dont debate, go converter first. it will help you out the most
Old 11-03-2006, 02:43 AM
  #14  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
ws649er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i think i've decided on the fuddle 3400 as an xmas gift to myself haha,, now i'm just lookin for the cheapest place for an install/tranny cooler. i kno my car at least runs 13's b/c i've put lengths on srt-4's/01 cobras which are both capable of 13's stock.
Old 11-03-2006, 03:06 AM
  #15  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
onebadblackz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: corsicana texas
Posts: 996
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

what would a stock WS6 run
Old 11-03-2006, 06:54 AM
  #16  
TECH Addict
 
300bhp/ton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: England
Posts: 2,650
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by onebadblackz
what would a stock WS6 run
Same as any other LS1. If you don't know what I mean, use the SEARCH
Old 11-03-2006, 07:02 AM
  #17  
TECH Addict
 
300bhp/ton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: England
Posts: 2,650
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ws649er
you think a 3400 stall has any chance of putting me into the 12's? i'm debating between that and some new gears next.
Go for a stall.

Only do gears when:

a) You've busted the 10 bolt and are upgrading to a 12 bolt/9"
b) you are doing a cam swap where you need different gears


The 2.73's really aren't as bad as man think. For high speed and roll racing they are actually IMO way better than the 3.23's.

BTW - I'm not certain of the current state of play, but I know recently there have been quite a few issues with FUddle. I'd do some research in the auto tranny forum before parting with any cash.

Also I'd be tempted to not get anything less than a 3600rpm stall. It shouldn't affect normal driveability too much but will be a better match if you ever get a cam. 4000rpm stalls are often a little OTT for most people.

Last edited by 300bhp/ton; 11-03-2006 at 07:14 AM.
Old 11-03-2006, 04:21 PM
  #18  
Teching In
 
ncarlson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: monygomery
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default track time

went to track < byron il. > this last sunday . 1st pass 13.51 101 .has lid and 3.23 gears . 2nd pass . tires spinning go into 2nd. to late for third run. 98 5.7 3.23 a4 has 88000 miles . with you haveing 2.73 and stock stall maybe 13.70. thats what my son ran in his 2000 when it was stock.
Old 11-03-2006, 06:12 PM
  #19  
11 Second Club
 
darrensls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sandwich, IL
Posts: 1,847
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Lid & cutout near sea level should be good for at least 13.5 @ 103. Maybe even a little better


Originally Posted by 300bhp/ton
The 2.73's really aren't as bad as man think. For high speed and roll racing they are actually IMO way better than the 3.23's.
I think you're overstating that just a little. Both gears pull hard on the highway with the 2.73's being able to hold third gear longer. But with the stock 26" tires 3.23's holds third till 142 mph. If the race isn't over by 142 then god help you.
Old 11-06-2006, 03:49 AM
  #20  
TECH Addict
 
300bhp/ton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: England
Posts: 2,650
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by darrensls1
I think you're overstating that just a little. Both gears pull hard on the highway with the 2.73's being able to hold third gear longer. But with the stock 26" tires 3.23's holds third till 142 mph. If the race isn't over by 142 then god help you.
It's not that, I mean yeah the 2.73's will allow you to bang the 158mph speed limiter with still a few hundre rpms left in the rpm range. So top speed in gear is quite dramtically different.

But 3.23's are IMO good for racing from a dig, as they will promote better ingear accelaration. The down side, is they leave the engine in too many dead spots for roll racing. There's link in my sig to a gear calculator, you can see all the dead spots real easy.

Such as racing from a 30-35mph roll. With 3.23's the car will NOT shift to 1st because it would be screaming it's nuts off. Yet you are way too low in the rpms for 2nd. This is the dreaded Fbody body "dead spot" so many speak off. And why even stock sn95 Stangs can get the jump under such conditions.

With 2.73's you are fine all the way up to 40mph and it will still kick down to 1st and bring you right in at 4400rpm (PEAK torque). So ~35mph is a 'sweet spot' for roll racing in a 2.73's geared car. As well as being a sensible speed to start from. Any slower and you might as well go from a dig.

For higher speed the 3.23's again have the dead spot not wanting to drop to 2nd but being again too low in the rpms. The 2.73's are less affected as the speed where it will kick down is more appropriate for roll racing.

3.42 is a better as it still offer good terminal speed in gear (more so if you up the rpm limit to 6500rpm) but has better in gear accelaration. It also doesn't suffer the same dead spots as 3.23's. There is still one dead spot but it's not as bad, and you just have to learn not to race from that particular speed.

3.73's have even less trouble with dead spots, as they are non existant, but these gears loose out in terminal speed and for high speed use they will ultimatley limit the cars potential. But from a dig racing over the 1/4 mile they are very ideal.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:46 AM.