why are 10sec N/A 4th gens SO RARE ?
#21
12 Second Club
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
10 second 01 SS M6 here. Stock milled 243 heads, Trex cam, MWC fab 9" and supporting mods. Usually drive the car to and from the track on slicks and skinnies. Car weighs around #3600lbs if i remember right. best 60' 1.50
#24
10 Second Club
I didnt go NA for a major reason. I drive my car ALOT as a cruiser, with the nitrous i am able to run 10's but still cruise and get 20mpg making 430hp on motor. I did it for comfort powers there when you need it, but not always there for when you just wanna relax.
Plus my rear end, and my suspension have'nt been touched, all factory 98 parts.
Plus my rear end, and my suspension have'nt been touched, all factory 98 parts.
#26
i've hit 11.02 with mine n/a. it's not 10's but damn close. m6, full rear bmr suspension, s60, f13, stock bottom, ported heads, ls1 intake, 315 dr & tons of weight reduction. 3620lbs including driver & half tank. it gets driven almost every day. once the weak rearend is replaced & good rubber thrown on, rev that bitch & let her go....she'll take it & come back asking for more. i have no idea how much power it makes & honestly couldn't care less cause it's a blast to drive.
#36
10 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Great cars, the Turbo Buicks were way ahead of their time - my 89 GTA has a TTA motor in it too and runs 10.50's, at least it did back when I was racing it lol. My TTA is stock. Love the cars but finding parts is a pain which is why I switched to racing LSx cars
#38
On The Tree
I went low 11's @ 3700 pounds with a m6. 126 mph was my best trap. Car had a stock bottom end l92 with 5.3 heads/pat g cam. I never got to really practice launching the car, my best 60 foot was like a 1.8!