Advanced Engineering Tech For the more hardcore LS1TECH residents

Exhaust Volume/Back Pressure Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-06-2012, 10:04 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
LS1RatRod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Exhaust Volume/Back Pressure Question

Is it possible to run a rectangular tubing for an exhaust? If it has the same flow volume as a 3" round exhaust will it have the same type of back pressure? The reason I ask is because im lowering my car and I have custom side pipes and they have issues with scraping the ground at current height. So I figured if I lower the car 1 3/4 in the rear 2" in front I can make it back running a 2"x4" (equivalent to 3"?) rectangular tubing instead of running the 3 1/2" round side pipes.
Old 03-08-2012, 07:01 AM
  #2  
TECH Addict
 
mark21742's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: PA/MD
Posts: 2,481
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I doubt you would see a difference in performance going to the square tubing, but I did read a good writeup a while beck about square vs round tube flow, and the same size volume round tube outflows the square tube
Old 03-09-2012, 09:39 AM
  #3  
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
VodeAn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Back pressure is NEVER a good thing. You gain low end torque from scavenging, a process in which after a section of gas leaves the head the vacuum behind it helps draw the next section through. I hear a lot of people say open headers is no good because their is no back pressure, this is incorrect. Open headers cause a loss of low end torque due to a lack of this scavenging effect. So the real question is how will switching to rectangular pipe effect scavenging? I would assume that you would lose some power from the exhaust gas and the vacuum behind it mixing, especially at the transition from round to square, however if you use square pipe for only the last 1/4 of your exhaust system the power loss would be negligible.

Last edited by VodeAn; 03-09-2012 at 09:41 AM. Reason: I cannot spell
Old 03-09-2012, 04:39 PM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (35)
 
99Bluz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: C. V., Kalifornia
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

I believe what you want is oval tubing, correct?
Old 03-09-2012, 05:16 PM
  #5  
TECH Addict
 
mark21742's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: PA/MD
Posts: 2,481
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I ended up crushing 3" pipe down to oval on a front wheel drive car one time to run under a flat floor for ground clearance...wasn't a performance beast though...1.7liter V4 with a wopping 78 HP
Old 03-12-2012, 07:17 AM
  #6  
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
VodeAn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 99Bluz28
I believe what you want is oval tubing, correct?
Good idea, I completely for got about that, oval will yield better results then square. In fact I may end up using some for my 300zx, to minimize the chance of scraping before the exhaust splits in the rear.
Old 03-12-2012, 09:08 AM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
3.4camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Galveston, TX
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

As long as the hydraulic diameter is the same you should be just fine.
HD=4*Area/perimeter.
Old 03-12-2012, 02:51 PM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (35)
 
99Bluz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: C. V., Kalifornia
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

The only down side is Oval Mandrel Bends are rather expensive.



Quick Reply: Exhaust Volume/Back Pressure Question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:02 AM.