What design for a custom max efficiency cam?
I have a rebuilt 99 Commodore LS1 6SPD LS1 3:46 bolts on 10:5:1 comp want to run on E10 fuel (94 Ron) same rating as your 91 octane (think 2002 Pontiac GTO in USA).
Desirable peak HP would be at 5500 rpm max or even a little lower.
I realize some would suggest a stock cam but stock cam tends to lower torque low in the rpms because of its wide LSA
What cam specs would be ideal?
Specs are- 202/202, .511/.511, 111+1 LSA. In testing it gained 20# of torque throughout the measurable RPM range.
Where it differs from many low duration and OEM cams is its low LSA. Most Cam Motion truck cams, for example, AND OEM cams, have LSA's around 116 degrees, which kills low speed torque compared to the 111 of the Tooley cam. Yet the Tooley cam still has -20 degrees overlap so idle quality does not suffer. That is how low duration AND low LSA get on so well in this cam.
Does this come close to your idea of what a high efficiency cam is?
great little cam with headers, UDP, OTRCAI.
I made 392 whp / 361 wtq with it.
Get HP tuners and enable lean cruise.
27-30 mpg.
Reports of quarter mile times is 12.1 to 12.5
But it has a very wide LSA which cuts low end power, which OP would like to preserve as much as possible.
Trending Topics
After reading all the theory of wide vs narrow, I still believe wide is better for a street car.
If the OP is concerned with gas mileage, narrow LSA has increased overlap, increased time when both valves are open. Wide spreads the power across the rpm range, narrow concentrates the power peak. So in theory if one wants some more power mid rpm at the sacrifice of low rpm then narrow makes sense.
But of course there is a lot more to cam design. Events, duration, ramp rates are part of the design magic that experienced designers impart in their cams.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
At the time it came out, the Lingenfelter GT 2-3 was ahead of its time with the wide duration split and high LSA that kept it smooth. The high lift sure didn't hurt things either.
Richards video (bottom link) on LSA seems like a lot of torque loss between the 112 and 120 LSA at 27 ft pnds but ends up being about 5 percent in reality. I wonder if that could be easily recovered in efficiency with less overlap better vacuum or some similar combination.
https://www.speed-talk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=14522
https://youtu.be/JUHwVCDjonU
Last edited by TimsLS1; Oct 31, 2021 at 04:00 PM.
And a cam that gains torque at a certain RPM will be more efficient than a "lesser" cam at the same RPM.
And throttle opening determines fuel flow. An engine that makes more max torque will require less throttle opening to make a certain torque number than an engine making less max torque.
So if the OP really wants gas mileage vs needing torque for a towing application, not sure either small cam will be significantly better than the other. (with good tuning.)
Unported stock 241 heads , compression ratio, hard to beat the result many of us achieved with the GT2-3.
Comparing my old combo to the new one, the GT2-3 had good torque starting literally at idle.
I ridden in a GTO with narrow LSA and the driver has to get the rpms up to avoid stalling, which means low torque.torque.
Last edited by TimsLS1; Oct 31, 2021 at 06:16 PM.
Watch some of Richard Holdener's video cam tests. The LS9 and truck cam videos are eye-openers for opposite reasons.
USA appears to have better LS truck torque cams than here in Australia we don't have LS engines in trucks so most of the development centres on lighter vehicles.
The BTR Torque cam @G Atsma brought to the table is a good option for what you're looking for.
If you wanted something just as docile with maybe a bit more mid-range due to its 6* earlier EVO Cam Motion has a good option. That would be their CXM-03-01-0105. Specs on it are .527/.527, 200/204, 114+3 with -26* of overlap. It's designed to provide a performance bump for a 5.3 in a truck and maintain excellent driveability and fuel economy. That should fit well here for your needs. Powerband-wise, they should be similar with both having a 31* IVC. With some budget-friendly LS6 style springs either would be plenty happy.
Feel free to compare the two with our Cam Timing Calculator.
Last edited by Summitracing; Nov 3, 2021 at 07:47 AM.







