vic Jr versus Standard intake question....
04-25-2006, 11:23 AM
#101
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cecil County Raceway!!!
Posts: 8,484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by NosboySS
I had a minor setback on my motor and had to pull it sunday, but itll be running by the end of the week. Never even had dyno time either 
I would like to PM you other Vic jr guys with my new cam specs and get some input. If you dont mind that it is?
BTW, The "awww" factor with this intake under your hood is priceless.
I would like to PM you other Vic jr guys with my new cam specs and get some input. If you dont mind that it is? BTW, The "awww" factor with this intake under your hood is priceless.
I'm all ears if you want to share. I'll probably give out ballpark specs on mine once we determine if it works...I will share this though....LSA is going to be less than or equal to 107
Last edited by Fireball; 04-25-2006 at 11:33 AM.
04-25-2006, 03:33 PM
#102
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Fireball
on its own, it may flow 380, but throw it on a head and you have a crazy mismatch at that interface.
I *think* I picked up alot with a simple quick portmatch.
I *think* I picked up alot with a simple quick portmatch.
Each of my ports LITERALLY had about 1/8" all the way around on the intake that I had to grind off and blend up the throat. I also knocked off all the casting bumps anywhere the grinder could reach which was a whole lot.
I probably took a pound of aluminum out of the intake. No joke.
The good thing is they make nice thick flanges so you can take away a lot of material but still have a lot left. I cant stress enough how this is NOT an "out of the box" bolt on for max performance.
04-25-2006, 06:26 PM
#105
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SStrokerAce
Guys, FWIW the single plane LS1 intake can use a lot of work. I have one that's undergoing surgery now in the shop before it gets ported.
Bret
Bret
04-25-2006, 08:47 PM
#110
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Norwalk, CT
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SStrokerAce
Guys, FWIW the single plane LS1 intake can use a lot of work. I have one that's undergoing surgery now in the shop before it gets ported.
Bret
Bret
.....but I could be way off!
04-25-2006, 09:37 PM
#112
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Norwalk, CT
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SStrokerAce
That might be it..... might be something else or a few more things.
Then again, the question is why would you want to do that?
Bret
Then again, the question is why would you want to do that?
Bret
.....the name says it all! All the extra airflow does'nt hurt either. 
04-26-2006, 09:36 AM
#114
On The Tree
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Houston/ Austin, TX
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dave88z
4500=DOMINATOR .....the name says it all! All the extra airflow does'nt hurt either.
.....the name says it all! All the extra airflow does'nt hurt either.----
Im gonna say "surgery" involves a 4500 flange and injector angles. Maybe a few other little tricks that i dont know about.
04-26-2006, 09:55 AM
#115
You can have too much plenum area, that's always a problem. It will make more power but lay over like crazy on the shifts. I ran into a guy who had this problem on his setup.... he picked up 35hp going from a single 4 tunnel ram to a dual 4. His trap increased appropriately but his ET died a lot due to no recovery between the 1-2 shift (it was a PG) The next thing he was going to try is a higher stall to try and get that back (bumped it another 400rpm)
Now when you have 2 shifts rather than 1, it can hurt you more. The elbow setups help the plenum area, and it's not like we are talking about a sheetmetal tunnel ram setup here so it's not huge.... Add on to that unless you are over 700hp your not going to see a gain to going with more throttle body than a 90mm can give you.
So you really think a Dom flange is worth it for that reason? I'll tell you it's some work to convert that over to that.
Bret
Now when you have 2 shifts rather than 1, it can hurt you more. The elbow setups help the plenum area, and it's not like we are talking about a sheetmetal tunnel ram setup here so it's not huge.... Add on to that unless you are over 700hp your not going to see a gain to going with more throttle body than a 90mm can give you.
So you really think a Dom flange is worth it for that reason? I'll tell you it's some work to convert that over to that.
Bret
04-26-2006, 07:27 PM
#116
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Norwalk, CT
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SStrokerAce
So you really think a Dom flange is worth it for that reason? I'll tell you it's some work to convert that over to that.
Bret
Bret
other thing I can think of is if you cut it up to really access the inside for port
work and then welded it together. I have this manifold but I didnt think it would be that hard to port with the short runners-I could be wrong.
I don't know if you race your car competitively but adding a Dom flange would make sense in that situation. Feel free to PM me, I can keep a secret
04-29-2006, 06:22 PM
#118
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hummm.....
All hope for these may not be lost yet!
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...10#post4720110
Congrats Nosboy!
All hope for these may not be lost yet!
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...10#post4720110
Congrats Nosboy!
Last edited by HALLZ; 04-29-2006 at 06:31 PM.