Advanced Engineering Tech For the more hardcore LS1TECH residents

4.8L crank and rods and 6.0L bore for E85

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-17-2006, 04:44 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Pecos Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 4.8L crank and rods and 6.0L bore for E85

Anyone done this before?

4.8L crank stroke (3.268")
4.8L rod length (6.275")
6.0L block bore (4.000")

Yields approximately 327 cid with a huge rod/stroke ration of 6.275/3.268 = 1.92:1



If I use 6.0L pistons made for the stock 6.098" rod length and 3.622" crank stroke, but instead use the 4.8L rod length of 6.275" and 3.268" crank stroke, I believe the piston will end up at the same compression height at top dead center.

If I use 61cc chamber (5.3L) heads, and flat top pistons, I calculate I will end up with a compression ratio of about 12.2:1.

If instead of flat top pistons, I use something like Diamond Racing's domed 6.0L pistons with a 10cc dome, I believe the 61cc chamber heads effectively become 51cc heads, and I calculate I will end up with a compression ratio increases to about 14.5:1.

Would this be a good purpose built LS1, LSx, GEN III E85 motor? E85 is 105 octane alcohol. I believe alcohol likes a high compression ratio and a high rod/stroke ratio. This combination of parts looks to be able to produce both.

If I use stock GM rods and impose a piston speed limit of 3500 feet/minute like typical GM cast connecting rods, this becomes approximately a 6500 rpm red line motor.

If I locate some stronger after market rods and impose a piston speed limit of 4000 feet/minute like typical GM forged connecting rods, this becomes approximately a 7500 rpm red line motor.

Anyone know of a source for forged 4.8L (6.275") connecting rods?

Can anyone find any flaws in my thinking here?

Last edited by Pecos Pete; 08-17-2006 at 08:21 PM.
Old 08-17-2006, 07:56 PM
  #2  
OWN3D BY MY PROF!
iTrader: (176)
 
Beaflag VonRathburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Jax Beach, Florida
Posts: 9,149
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I really like this idea, sounds really good for CI limited racing series. Too bad, I don't know of any places around me where we can get E85. Sounds like it's opening up new possibilities in Gen III/IV performance.
Old 08-22-2006, 06:43 AM
  #3  
TECH Addict
 
chuntington101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,866
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

be REALLY nice for a turbo motor to! get the CR down to about 8.5-1 and run GOOD boost and you will have a nice and VERY wide power band!

thanks Chris.
Old 08-22-2006, 01:23 PM
  #4  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
NO-OPTION-2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

This is exactly what i'm planning fo my 2003 S10 swap.

LS2 block, heads, and pistons, 4.8L crank and rods = 328.5 ci.

Good power and great RPM potential. It's going to be setup for open track days at the new Miller Motorsport Park.
Old 08-22-2006, 11:40 PM
  #5  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
under_construction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If anyone is interested, I have a set of 4.8 rods and a 4.8 crank I picked up from valvegod for this combo. Don't need them now (changed classes - need more displacement)


pm me if interested and we can deal.
Old 08-24-2006, 08:40 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
 
Stampede4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,412
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

What about using the L92 heads, and intake?

Thanks.
Old 05-08-2015, 10:34 AM
  #7  
Teching In
 
Boggies69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 4.8l rods

I've got a set of rods, as well as the 4.8 crank...I'm using the 4.8l flat top Pistons to boost up the compression in my 5.3l, basically trying to build an iron L33 my self...if your interested...pm me

Last edited by Boggies69; 05-08-2015 at 10:35 AM. Reason: Forgot to add this..
Old 05-12-2015, 05:40 PM
  #8  
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
 
Violence.z06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: NJ
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Seems the combo works very well. im doing something similar but turbo with less stroke more bore.

This should show some potential of that combo. Only problem with it all motor is the torque. i was going to go all motor 350 cubes with a 3.185 stroke and big bore. goal was 1000hp at the crank. torque would have been in the 550hp range. Unless you give it a small shot of nitrous it wont really shine until the way upper rpm

Link below--4.8L crank in a 6.0 block. This motor did 1092hp and 755tq @7600rpm.

The following users liked this post:
Sharkbonz (05-11-2023)
Old 05-28-2015, 11:37 PM
  #9  
Teching In
 
glu0n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ya, i don't know why we don't see many screaming LS engines with lightning quick throttle response. I think the firing order change is partially to blame, the old firing order made a better sound imo. The old small blocks have been turning 8000rpm for decades, i love it when an engine screams in pleasure

Last edited by glu0n; 05-28-2015 at 11:44 PM.
Old 05-31-2015, 02:19 PM
  #10  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (28)
 
gnx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 3,453
Received 150 Likes on 97 Posts

Default

There is no reason a stock 3.62" crank can't turn 7500rpm running good rods/valvetrain. To give up nearly 40ci going from 364ci to 327ci just gives up free torque/hp unless you are restricted to running a class limiting engine size.

A 4" stroke crank should have no issues running to 7500rpm either once you run upgraded rods/valvetrain.

If you plan to run a solid roller cam and even higher RPMs then that is going to make the short stroke combo really shine.... but then most production intakes run out of steam at 6600-6800rpm and just flatline as peak flow has been reached. You need a single plane intake or custom sheetmetal to use the power up top including some very good flowing heads.

I bought a motor that had a 6.0 liter class restriction out of a Bonneville Salt Flats S-10 pickup truck. It was 4.185" bore and 3.27" stroke and just under 6.0 liters. AllPro heads that supposedly flow 430cfm and AllPro single plane intake. It was being revved to 9000rpm+ and made 625rwhp+ with this combo.
Old 05-31-2015, 04:36 PM
  #11  
Restricted User
 
JoeNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,194
Received 104 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Boggies69
I've got a set of rods, as well as the 4.8 crank...I'm using the 4.8l flat top Pistons to boost up the compression in my 5.3l, basically trying to build an iron L33 my self...if your interested...pm me
You bumped a 9-year old thread.... I don't think they're going to PM you.

Originally Posted by Violence.z06

Link below--4.8L crank in a 6.0 block. This motor did 1092hp and 755tq @7600rpm.

332" Turbo LS engine dyno, 1092HP 20psi - YouTube

He has since went through the engine and switched to higher compression and a bigger cam. I think he made well over 600 HP N/A, and then similar numbers to the old combo on much lower boost.


Originally Posted by glu0n
Ya, i don't know why we don't see many screaming LS engines with lightning quick throttle response. I think the firing order change is partially to blame, the old firing order made a better sound imo. The old small blocks have been turning 8000rpm for decades, i love it when an engine screams in pleasure

Most of those high-revving, snappy throttle small blocks are using solid roller combinations with ultra light valvetrain. The same type of setup works just as well in an LS.
Old 01-08-2018, 09:32 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
albert doty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default aldoty

Originally Posted by Pecos Pete
Anyone done this before?

4.8L crank stroke (3.268")
4.8L rod length (6.275")
6.0L block bore (4.000")

Yields approximately 327 cid with a huge rod/stroke ration of 6.275/3.268 = 1.92:1



If I use 6.0L pistons made for the stock 6.098" rod length and 3.622" crank stroke, but instead use the 4.8L rod length of 6.275" and 3.268" crank stroke, I believe the piston will end up at the same compression height at top dead center.

If I use 61cc chamber (5.3L) heads, and flat top pistons, I calculate I will end up with a compression ratio of about 12.2:1.

If instead of flat top pistons, I use something like Diamond Racing's domed 6.0L pistons with a 10cc dome, I believe the 61cc chamber heads effectively become 51cc heads, and I calculate I will end up with a compression ratio increases to about 14.5:1.

Would this be a good purpose built LS1, LSx, GEN III E85 motor? E85 is 105 octane alcohol. I believe alcohol likes a high compression ratio and a high rod/stroke ratio. This combination of parts looks to be able to produce both.

If I use stock GM rods and impose a piston speed limit of 3500 feet/minute like typical GM cast connecting rods, this becomes approximately a 6500 rpm red line motor.

If I locate some stronger after market rods and impose a piston speed limit of 4000 feet/minute like typical GM forged connecting rods, this becomes approximately a 7500 rpm red line motor.

Anyone know of a source for forged 4.8L (6.275") connecting rods?

Can anyone find any flaws in my thinking here?
yes 53 heads suck. 6.0 heads have bigger valves,keep compressiondown souse on street. ot trick flow heads. crane makes a good am ,speedmaster makesrods. use corvette intake. power wellgoodtunegetts you 475hp puton a super charger and get 800+ with low booost
Old 01-08-2018, 10:04 PM
  #13  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
LLLosingit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Iowa
Posts: 3,837
Received 474 Likes on 354 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by albert doty
yes 53 heads suck. 6.0 heads have bigger valves,keep compressiondown souse on street. ot trick flow heads. crane makes a good am ,speedmaster makesrods. use corvette intake. power wellgoodtunegetts you 475hp puton a super charger and get 800+ with low booost
Keyboard acting up or what This post was started in 2006 by the way.
Old 04-28-2018, 05:06 PM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
BigEd_72455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 1,482
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LLLosingit
Keyboard acting up or what This post was started in 2006 by the way.
blame google. I searched LS1 piston 4.8 crank and rods and got here. I can spend less money for LS1 pistons that will fit 5.3 crank and rod combo than buying replacement 4.8 pistons. And since I am on a drastically tight budget, I am looking for ways to get more performance with what I already own vs having to buy other parts to make it work.
Old 06-05-2021, 12:10 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
rbiron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Rods

Originally Posted by Pecos Pete
Anyone done this before?

4.8L crank stroke (3.268")
4.8L rod length (6.275")
6.0L block bore (4.000")

Yields approximately 327 cid with a huge rod/stroke ration of 6.275/3.268 = 1.92:1



If I use 6.0L pistons made for the stock 6.098" rod length and 3.622" crank stroke, but instead use the 4.8L rod length of 6.275" and 3.268" crank stroke, I believe the piston will end up at the same compression height at top dead center.

If I use 61cc chamber (5.3L) heads, and flat top pistons, I calculate I will end up with a compression ratio of about 12.2:1.

If instead of flat top pistons, I use something like Diamond Racing's domed 6.0L pistons with a 10cc dome, I believe the 61cc chamber heads effectively become 51cc heads, and I calculate I will end up with a compression ratio increases to about 14.5:1.

Would this be a good purpose built LS1, LSx, GEN III E85 motor? E85 is 105 octane alcohol. I believe alcohol likes a high compression ratio and a high rod/stroke ratio. This combination of parts looks to be able to produce both.

If I use stock GM rods and impose a piston speed limit of 3500 feet/minute like typical GM cast connecting rods, this becomes approximately a 6500 rpm red line motor.

If I locate some stronger after market rods and impose a piston speed limit of 4000 feet/minute like typical GM forged connecting rods, this becomes approximately a 7500 rpm red line motor.

Anyone know of a source for forged 4.8L (6.275") connecting rods?

Can anyone find any flaws in my thinking here?
Sounds about right but all GM connecting rods are forged so unless you are looking for something better like h beam rods stick with factory parts there's nothing wrong with them one thing though use gen 4 stuff the other gen rods were weak. Find yourself a set of square port heads off a 2500 or 3500 truck the ones I'm using are 823 casting number get em ported pay close attention to the exhaust ports. I'm going with a 6.5 rod and a 4 inch stroke piston in mine for a rod ratio of 2 to 1.

Last edited by rbiron; 06-05-2021 at 12:14 PM. Reason: Errors
The following users liked this post:
DirtyDoug (09-09-2023)
Old 06-05-2021, 12:43 PM
  #16  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 20,879
Received 3,023 Likes on 2,354 Posts
Default

LS connecting rods are NOT forged. They are sintered powdered metal. Different process... but very durable.
Old 06-13-2021, 08:02 AM
  #17  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Old Buzzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bostwick, GA.
Posts: 696
Received 298 Likes on 220 Posts

Default

More engines 101 in the advanced engr forum.....
The following users liked this post:
G Atsma (06-13-2021)



Quick Reply: 4.8L crank and rods and 6.0L bore for E85



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:55 PM.