Math Gurus Inside
Thread Starter
12 Second Club
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Math Gurus Inside You can go to the Golen Engine site and they have free drag racing calculators you can use to figure out unkown values like HP from know stuff on your time slips. What I'm looking for is a formula to figure out how much a head wind takes off your top end in the 1/4. I ran yesterday and there was a 20 to 30 knot wind blowining down the track. I was down several MPH and ET and was wondering if there was a way to figure the loss.
I assume you would use dynamic air pressure and coefficient of drag... something like F=C*A*rho*g*V where C is the coefficient of drag (something like .4?), A is frontal area of the car (height X width), rho is the density of the air, g is the acceleration of gravity, and V is the velocity of the wind. This gives a force, and I bet you can use the radius of your rear wheels to calculate torque (T = r X F). Since you have ~20% losses through the drivetrain, multiply by 1.2 or so to get approximately the amount of extra torque you would need from the crank to compensate for the headwind.
You could also use newton's law (F=ma) and kinematics (x = x0 + v0*t + .5*a*t^2) to get the extra ET.
Seem reasonable?
You could also use newton's law (F=ma) and kinematics (x = x0 + v0*t + .5*a*t^2) to get the extra ET.
Seem reasonable?
Originally Posted by nycab
I assume you would use dynamic air pressure and coefficient of drag... something like F=C*A*rho*g*V where C is the coefficient of drag (something like .4?), A is frontal area of the car (height X width), rho is the density of the air, g is the acceleration of gravity, and V is the velocity of the wind. This gives a force, and I bet you can use the radius of your rear wheels to calculate torque (T = r X F). Since you have ~20% losses through the drivetrain, multiply by 1.2 or so to get approximately the amount of extra torque you would need from the crank to compensate for the headwind.
You could also use newton's law (F=ma) and kinematics (x = x0 + v0*t + .5*a*t^2) to get the extra ET.
Seem reasonable?
You could also use newton's law (F=ma) and kinematics (x = x0 + v0*t + .5*a*t^2) to get the extra ET.
Seem reasonable?
This would have to be done using differential equations. It wouldn't be too hard but it would involve a ton of things as torque to the track varies the entire time, force done by drag goes up exponentially etc.
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,979
Likes: 3
From: Upstate NY
Originally Posted by dedge
You can go to the Golen Engine site and they have free drag racing calculators you can use to figure out unkown values like HP from know stuff on your time slips. What I'm looking for is a formula to figure out how much a head wind takes off your top end in the 1/4. I ran yesterday and there was a 20 to 30 knot wind blowining down the track. I was down several MPH and ET and was wondering if there was a way to figure the loss.
If the 60-330 times didn't agree, shift the windy curve to match at the 60 ft times and see what you get. Unless you had wind tunnel data for your car, and very accurate wind vector, calculation would probably be less accurate.
Of course you could have run the strip with the wind as well as against it and average...but getting stopped might be a problem.
Originally Posted by Alvin
This would have to be done using differential equations. It wouldn't be too hard but it would involve a ton of things as torque to the track varies the entire time, force done by drag goes up exponentially etc.
This won't give you a 100% perfect number, but I assume you're looking for ballpark, right?
The extra drag from the headwind is not fairly constant. The added drag from the headwind is about 10x more at the end of the quarter mile than at the beginning depending on the exact trap speed and headwind.
well, it seems to me that since drag is proportional to V^2, then let's do a quick calculation.
Assuming final trap speed is 100mph and headwind 30mph, then at the beginning, we have wind's contribution as a constant times 30^2 = 27000 and at the end, its contribution is 130^2 - 100^2 = 6900. This means that wind resistance has a REDUCTION in effect by about 4x at the end as compared with the beginning.
Assuming final trap speed is 100mph and headwind 30mph, then at the beginning, we have wind's contribution as a constant times 30^2 = 27000 and at the end, its contribution is 130^2 - 100^2 = 6900. This means that wind resistance has a REDUCTION in effect by about 4x at the end as compared with the beginning.
Trending Topics
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power
Verdad Gallardo
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die
Verdad Gallardo
Originally Posted by nycab
well, it seems to me that since drag is proportional to V^2, then let's do a quick calculation.
Assuming final trap speed is 100mph and headwind 30mph, then at the beginning, we have wind's contribution as a constant times 30^2 = 27000 and at the end, its contribution is 130^2 - 100^2 = 6900. This means that wind resistance has a REDUCTION in effect by about 4x at the end as compared with the beginning.
Assuming final trap speed is 100mph and headwind 30mph, then at the beginning, we have wind's contribution as a constant times 30^2 = 27000 and at the end, its contribution is 130^2 - 100^2 = 6900. This means that wind resistance has a REDUCTION in effect by about 4x at the end as compared with the beginning.
Id take an old timeslip do a quadratic interpolation and do the same for the new one with the headwind. Graph the curves as has been suggested. The difference will be get you pretty damn close to the force of the headwind.
