Advanced Engineering Tech For the more hardcore LS1TECH residents

DCR vs. Bore, Chamber Design, Engine Load

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-15-2007, 01:55 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
hammertime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Smithton, IL
Posts: 1,436
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Lightbulb DCR vs. Bore, Chamber Design, Engine Load

I've been researching a bit, and I'm not sure I've found anything to specifically address this question. I've seen several posts about what is considered the 'accepted safe DCR' for LS1/LS6 engines, most around ~8.5:1 for 91 octane and around ~ 8.7-8.8:1 for 93 octane fuel.

My questions are the following:

        As most, my questions are covering an agenda, so I'll now address my specific example. I am considering an LS2 conversion in a G-body car that could tow as much as 4000 lbs trailer and gear. Given this would be a multipurpose vehicle (read: toy) I would still like to get the most performance possible unloaded, while not compromising the ability to tow a few times a year. A 4.10 or 4.30 gear and M6 should give plenty of torque multiplication, and help to avoid detonation, but close attention to the tune and KR would be addressed. Plans include AFR 205 heads, proper quench, and cam to be determined.

        Am I ?

        Thanks in advance for your replies...
        Old 10-15-2007, 02:37 PM
          #2  
        TECH Addict
        iTrader: (22)
         
        Stang's Bane's Avatar
         
        Join Date: Aug 2005
        Location: Mont Belvieu, TX
        Posts: 2,649
        Likes: 0
        Received 1 Like on 1 Post

        Default

        Originally Posted by hammertime
        I've been researching a bit, and I'm not sure I've found anything to specifically address this question. I've seen several posts about what is considered the 'accepted safe DCR' for LS1/LS6 engines, most around ~8.5:1 for 91 octane and around ~ 8.7-8.8:1 for 93 octane fuel.

        My questions are the following:

              As most, my questions are covering an agenda, so I'll now address my specific example. I am considering an LS2 conversion in a G-body car that could tow as much as 4000 lbs trailer and gear. Given this would be a multipurpose vehicle (read: toy) I would still like to get the most performance possible unloaded, while not compromising the ability to tow a few times a year. A 4.10 or 4.30 gear and M6 should give plenty of torque multiplication, and help to avoid detonation, but close attention to the tune and KR would be addressed. Plans include AFR 205 heads, proper quench, and cam to be determined.

              Am I ?

              Thanks in advance for your replies...
              IMHO, the DCR term is thrown around way too much. DCR is not God of engine specs, it is a by-product of the proper valve events....


              My advice would be to call the guy you quote in your sig and talk to him about it. He can explain it much better than any half-*** attempt I could make.
              Old 10-15-2007, 08:46 PM
                #3  
              TECH Enthusiast
              iTrader: (2)
               
              Alvin's Avatar
               
              Join Date: Dec 2005
              Posts: 718
              Likes: 0
              Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
              Default

              Originally Posted by Stang's Bane
              IMHO, the DCR term is thrown around way too much. DCR is not God of engine specs, it is a by-product of the proper valve events....

              Thank you... If it wasn't for intake tuning and wave dynamics IVC would happen at BDC exactly. IVC is chosen for best cylinder filling.. not because compression is too high.
              Old 10-15-2007, 10:13 PM
                #4  
              TECH Fanatic
               
              Old SStroker's Avatar
               
              Join Date: Jun 2002
              Location: Upstate NY
              Posts: 1,979
              Likes: 0
              Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

              Default

              Originally Posted by Alvin@pcmforless.com
              Thank you... If it wasn't for intake tuning and wave dynamics IVC would happen at BDC exactly. IVC is chosen for best cylinder filling.. not because compression is too high.
              You are an optimist. I'd say less than 50% of the time based on the cam numbers I see. Too bad, isn't it?
              Old 10-19-2007, 05:40 PM
                #5  
              TECH Fanatic
              Thread Starter
              iTrader: (1)
               
              hammertime's Avatar
               
              Join Date: Apr 2006
              Location: Smithton, IL
              Posts: 1,436
              Likes: 0
              Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

              Default

              I really do want to come back to this, but I realized after reading the responses I had never made the time to read through the Camshaft Discussion I, II & III threads I marked in my Favorites so long ago.


              I'm not promising an intelligent response, but I think perhaps I could have worded the questions posed above a little better. In short:

              If I plan to tow with an LS2 and a manual trans, what is a safe Static Compression with an IVC of 42* ABDC (either a 224 Intake Lobe on a 110 ICL, or a 228 Intake Lobe on a 108 ICL).

              One of my concerns is the Chamber size on a Large Bore AFR 205, as it seems to place the Static Compression rather high with a .040 gasket for the best quench, even unmilled, if the calculator I'm using is correct.
              Old 10-19-2007, 10:29 PM
                #6  
              TECH Fanatic
               
              Old SStroker's Avatar
               
              Join Date: Jun 2002
              Location: Upstate NY
              Posts: 1,979
              Likes: 0
              Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

              Default

              Originally Posted by hammertime
              I really do want to come back to this, but I realized after reading the responses I had never made the time to read through the Camshaft Discussion I, II & III threads I marked in my Favorites so long ago.


              I'm not promising an intelligent response, but I think perhaps I could have worded the questions posed above a little better. In short:

              If I plan to tow with an LS2 and a manual trans, what is a safe Static Compression with an IVC of 42* ABDC (either a 224 Intake Lobe on a 110 ICL, or a 228 Intake Lobe on a 108 ICL).

              One of my concerns is the Chamber size on a Large Bore AFR 205, as it seems to place the Static Compression rather high with a .040 gasket for the best quench, even unmilled, if the calculator I'm using is correct.
              You need to let a a pro design your tow/toy engine. It's a lot more complicated than "a 224 Intake Lobe on a 110 ICL, or a 228 Intake Lobe on a 108 ICL.

              Stang's Bane had some pretty good advice. My guess is that you don't want that kind of advice. That's too bad.
              Old 10-22-2007, 09:56 PM
                #7  
              TECH Fanatic
              Thread Starter
              iTrader: (1)
               
              hammertime's Avatar
               
              Join Date: Apr 2006
              Location: Smithton, IL
              Posts: 1,436
              Likes: 0
              Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

              Default

              Originally Posted by Old SStroker
              Stang's Bane had some pretty good advice. My guess is that you don't want that kind of advice. That's too bad.
              That's not necessarily true, I'm just too hard-headed to admit what I don't know. That, and I don't think its right for me to waste someone's valuable time on something I'm pondering.

              I would like to understand more about the process, but I'm stuck in the deep tech part of Cam Discussion II.
              Old 10-23-2007, 07:21 AM
                #8  
              TECH Addict
              iTrader: (22)
               
              Stang's Bane's Avatar
               
              Join Date: Aug 2005
              Location: Mont Belvieu, TX
              Posts: 2,649
              Likes: 0
              Received 1 Like on 1 Post

              Default

              Originally Posted by hammertime
              That's not necessarily true, I'm just too hard-headed to admit what I don't know. That, and I don't think its right for me to waste someone's valuable time on something I'm pondering.

              I would like to understand more about the process, but I'm stuck in the deep tech part of Cam Discussion II.
              I used to be like that also. Now, I will call Bret and ask him just about any off the wall **** I can think of. Granted. I have spent my share of money with him, BUT I have learned 10x the amount I have spent. Have him grind you a cam, it may cost a couple of $$ more than one of the off the shelf grinds, but you can learn more from the conversations than you can pay for.

              Back to your original question. Honestly I believe if you make sure your SCR is at a decent level, your DCR will come out in the wash. I wouldn't lose sleep over the DCR, it is way overhyped
              Old 10-23-2007, 07:22 AM
                #9  
              TECH Addict
              iTrader: (22)
               
              Stang's Bane's Avatar
               
              Join Date: Aug 2005
              Location: Mont Belvieu, TX
              Posts: 2,649
              Likes: 0
              Received 1 Like on 1 Post

              Default

              Originally Posted by Old SStroker
              Stang's Bane had some pretty good advice. My guess is that you don't want that kind of advice. That's too bad.

              Thank's Jon. Usually I am known as the "bad influence"



              Quick Reply: DCR vs. Bore, Chamber Design, Engine Load



              All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:23 PM.