Camaro owners...Shut up the TA guys
12-13-2005, 03:06 AM
#121
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Buckeye AZ
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by psykoTA
Wow, that has to be the dumbest statement I have ever read on here. I have never seen TA guys say that, unless it was in total fun. Are you kidding? I saw no jester symbol (
).
)."Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level then beat you with experience." FROM DVST8OR
12-13-2005, 12:04 PM
#124
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: upstate ny
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Cop Car
no we cant. 1980s seats and early 1990s dashes dont do it for me. those T bar auto shifters look amazing 
12-13-2005, 12:53 PM
#125
this thread rules!!! lol...im kinda partial to my WS.6 but there are camaros out there that put the ws.6 looks to shame when they're done right. in stock form, camaro just doesnt stand a chance in the looks department. not alot of cars that can just command respect just sitting there parked like a ws.6 can. imo.
12-13-2005, 01:07 PM
#127
Originally Posted by chupr0kabra
Camaros might look like catfish, but at least I wouldn't confuse the front end of my car with Patrick Ewing (WS6).
-Mike
-Mike
12-13-2005, 01:11 PM
#128
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Pearland, TX
Posts: 3,778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TNTramair
PATRICK EWING?!?!?!? HA HA...that was some funny ****. atleast patrick ewing doesnt look like a 99-2001 concorde from the front...
-Mike
12-13-2005, 02:01 PM
#130
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Indy
Posts: 2,520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by nasty99WS6
Yeah, the camaros interior is just LIGHT years ahead of the Firebirds.. insert sarcasm here..
12-13-2005, 02:21 PM
#131
from the way i read that,cop car, it seems as if youve never been in a 1980's firebird OR camaro. the reason the firebird dashes are the same since 93, because GM dont fix what aint broken. the camaro dashes looked like **** pre 97, so an upgrade was only natural. and, the seats in the 4th gen t/a's are far superior to the seats in ANY camaro. have you ever seen anyone put camaro seats in a t/a ??? negz. can you say lumbar??
12-13-2005, 02:48 PM
#133
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Denver/Houston
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 98 LS WON
Even though Im a die hard T/A guy, Id definetely sport Camaro's like these:
12-13-2005, 04:47 PM
#137
11 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Montgomery, IL
Posts: 1,831
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by phantomzer0
from the way i read that,cop car, it seems as if youve never been in a 1980's firebird OR camaro. the reason the firebird dashes are the same since 93, because GM dont fix what aint broken. the camaro dashes looked like **** pre 97, so an upgrade was only natural. and, the seats in the 4th gen t/a's are far superior to the seats in ANY camaro. have you ever seen anyone put camaro seats in a t/a ??? negz. can you say lumbar??
i like how the camaro is nice plain, personally i really like the LT1 front ends
that and i noticed when i was looking for my car, if you take a camaro and firebird, give them the same exact options, mileage, everything down to the tires are the same, the firebird will always cost more
12-13-2005, 04:50 PM
#139
Staging Lane
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Zangel
Whoever said anything about pink or flowers? Guess I must have missed that part. It also has nothing to do with being a sports car. Some people would say a Vette is pretty, but that doesn't make it less of a sports car. Put some thought into it. The reason a Firebird would be considered more "foo-foo" than a Camaro is because of the extra frills that they add. Ever looked at the interior of a Firebird vs. a Camaro? The Camaro is plain while the Firebird has big cushy seats and a more dramatic dash/door panels, and is definately considered flashy comparidly. Compare the body of a Firebird to a Camaro. The Camaro is basic, sometimes considered boring while the Firebird has all these flashy lines and "wide hips". More of a curvasous body. Step outside of the very few girls in this world that may actually know a thing or two about cars and lets consider the vast majority who don't know squat and want the car for attention. What's going to be easier to sell? The flashy, curvy, PRETTY Firebird or what most consider the plain Camaro? You could even say it is about status in some cases. Which one "appears" to be more expensive or of a higher value. Some of you are trying to make a big deal out of something that's not. I don't know if I hit some buttons or offended anyone, but it wasn't my intention. Nothing to get all uptight about. Take a chill pill....
12-13-2005, 04:55 PM
#140
11 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Montgomery, IL
Posts: 1,831
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Luv2spdT/A
Why spend all that money to try and make a Camaro look as good as a T/A when you can just get the T/A?