Automatic Transmission 2-Speed thru 10-Speed GM Autos | Converters | Shift Kits
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

4l60e Reverse Input drum clearance using Blue Plates

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 7, 2015 | 01:56 PM
  #1  
salemetro's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 0
From: Salem/Keizer
Default 4l60e Reverse Input drum clearance using Blue Plates

I'm building my first '01 4l60e using the Blueplate Special clutches, and a host of other supporting mods. I'm finally to the point of reassembly, and have measured .030 clearance in the Reverse input drum...but am shooting for at least .050, as this is the recommended clearance for the Sonnax smart tech input drum using the same clutch material. I'm assuming that the clearance should be the same if not more like .060 for the Reverse pack, as it spends most of it's life freewheeling.

Thoughts?

Last edited by mrvedit; Apr 8, 2015 at 11:52 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2015 | 12:18 PM
  #2  
mrvedit's Avatar
Moderator
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 7,321
Likes: 527
From: Ann Arbor, MI
Default

First using Blue frictions for the reverse input drum is probably overkill. Also, there is little correlation between the clearance in the reverse drum with the clearance of the 3/4 clutch. Since you (probably) are not engaging Reverse at high throttle, the clearance is less critical and can be higher.

When Blue frictions are used in the 3/4 clutch my suggested clearance is .005 to .007 per friction (e.g. .050 total). At .007 per friction times the 4 frictions in the reverse drum, I would consider the minimal clearance to be .028. But I would also aim for a bit more.

Also, congrats on doing your own rebuild.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2015 | 01:39 PM
  #3  
coryforsenate's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 607
Likes: 3
From: College Station, TX
Default

My clearance was initially like 0.070-0.075, which is technically within spec. But I swapped out the backing plate with the thicker one and got it down to about 0.050.

If you have a micrometer, you can measure your backing plate size. It's possible you have the thickest of the three sizes. Or you can take it to a shop and they can measure it, with you saying you need to buy a thinner one.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2015 | 02:41 PM
  #4  
MPTrans.'s Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 20
Likes: 3
Default

You can also substitute the bottom dished plate with a wavy steel and it should free up to within spec.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2015 | 03:51 PM
  #5  
salemetro's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 0
From: Salem/Keizer
Default

Originally Posted by mrvedit
First using Blue frictions for the reverse input drum is probably overkill. Also, there is little correlation between the clearance in the reverse drum with the clearance of the 3/4 clutch. Since you (probably) are not engaging Reverse at high throttle, the clearance is less critical and can be higher.

When Blue frictions are used in the 3/4 clutch my suggested clearance is .005 to .007 per friction (e.g. .050 total). At .007 per friction times the 4 frictions in the reverse drum, I would consider the minimal clearance to be .028. But I would also aim for a bit more.

Also, congrats on doing your own rebuild.
Thanks for the info and help ;-) Yeah, I had a bit of a brain fart regarding clearance....as far as I can tell, the minimum in the 3/4 works out to be .0055/plate, so I'm likely in the ballpark for the reverse input @ .030, but I'm thinking that .040-ish should be better, given the material. And yeah, I'm learning that the Blues are overkill for everything but the 3/4 pack, but I bought them all at the same time in a "package deal". We'll see how it all goes :-)
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2015 | 04:18 PM
  #6  
salemetro's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 0
From: Salem/Keizer
Default

Originally Posted by coryforsenate
My clearance was initially like 0.070-0.075, which is technically within spec. But I swapped out the backing plate with the thicker one and got it down to about 0.050.

If you have a micrometer, you can measure your backing plate size. It's possible you have the thickest of the three sizes. Or you can take it to a shop and they can measure it, with you saying you need to buy a thinner one.
I measured the .030 with the .076 turbulator steels....looks like they are also available in .067, which should get me to .048 by swapping 2 of them. Any thoughts on using 2 different thickness steels in the pack?
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2015 | 04:51 PM
  #7  
MPTrans.'s Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 20
Likes: 3
Default

I would keep the reverse input drum on the loose side to prevent clutch drag (that's why they made the turbulator steels). Also, if you are using the Transgo orifice cup plugs on the reverse piston and have tight clearance, you will definitely have drag issues.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2015 | 05:09 PM
  #8  
coryforsenate's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 607
Likes: 3
From: College Station, TX
Default

Originally Posted by salemetro
I measured the .030 with the .076 turbulator steels....looks like they are also available in .067, which should get me to .048 by swapping 2 of them. Any thoughts on using 2 different thickness steels in the pack?
I used two thicker steels in my 3-4 clutch pack and put them in the center of the pack. Works just fine.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2015 | 08:23 PM
  #9  
mrvedit's Avatar
Moderator
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 7,321
Likes: 527
From: Ann Arbor, MI
Default

Originally Posted by MPTrans.
I would keep the reverse input drum on the loose side to prevent clutch drag (that's why they made the turbulator steels). Also, if you are using the Transgo orifice cup plugs on the reverse piston and have tight clearance, you will definitely have drag issues.
I have been told by several builders not to use the Transgo reverse drum orifice cup plugs, at least not in newer ('96+) 4L60E. Perhaps they were a relic from the 700R4 and very early 4L60E days?

Last edited by mrvedit; Apr 8, 2015 at 10:01 PM. Reason: Make my post clearer.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2015 | 09:46 PM
  #10  
salemetro's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 0
From: Salem/Keizer
Default

Originally Posted by mrvedit
I have been told by several builders not to use them, at least not in newer ('96+) 4L60E. Perhaps they were a relic from the 700R4 and very early 4L60E days?
I'm not sure. When looking for replacements, they list as "93-up"...and this unit is a 2001...appeared to be bone stock on disassembly. So, you're thinking that I should just go with conventional steels? Also, do you think that .040-ish will still be too close for this setup?
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2015 | 10:00 PM
  #11  
mrvedit's Avatar
Moderator
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 7,321
Likes: 527
From: Ann Arbor, MI
Default

Sorry for any confusion, I meant not to use the "Transgo orifice cup plugs" and was hoping for MPTrans' confirmation. Will update my previous thread to correct the confusion.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2015 | 04:09 PM
  #12  
PBA's Avatar
PBA
TECH Resident
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 969
Likes: 119
Default

Use the "waved" steel to replace the Belville steel. This will stop the metal contamination from the Belville eating the drum. Set the clutch clearance to .040" - .070". Always use the Turbulator steels as they get rid of the excess drag. DO NOT install the orfice plugs from TransGo, as they will cause the piston to try to apply at hi-rpm (5,500 & up) from centrifuge which will burn the clutches and gradually you will lose reverse. Leave the aluminum piston alone. The reverse apply feed hole in the separator plate should be .104".
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2015 | 04:12 PM
  #13  
mrvedit's Avatar
Moderator
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 7,321
Likes: 527
From: Ann Arbor, MI
Default

^^^ As always, thank you Dana. Especially for the very definitive answer.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2015 | 05:22 PM
  #14  
salemetro's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 0
From: Salem/Keizer
Default

Originally Posted by PBA
Use the "waved" steel to replace the Belville steel. This will stop the metal contamination from the Belville eating the drum. Set the clutch clearance to .040" - .070". Always use the Turbulator steels as they get rid of the excess drag. DO NOT install the orfice plugs from TransGo, as they will cause the piston to try to apply at hi-rpm (5,500 & up) from centrifuge which will burn the clutches and gradually you will lose reverse. Leave the aluminum piston alone. The reverse apply feed hole in the separator plate should be .104".
MUCH appreciated Dana. I'll double-check the reverse apply feed....but I'm sure it's right, as you set it all up for me :-)
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:00 PM.