vacuum modulated or not?
i'll be making around 500hp, and most are telling me to go with it except the person who is building my tranny and he builds pretty nice trannies...
my only worry is, will the transmission get pressurized since i run a turbo? i dont think it should, but still lol :p
also what if my vacuum at idle isnt so great (it will have a midsize turbo cam) and everytime i put it in gear, it'll shift like hell into Drive?
this is for an LT1 btw... i much prefer computer conrolling everything but ppl are telling me to just let it do the shifting with vacuum...
what do i do?
i noticed cars that have low vacuum ad idle (because of a big cam or something) shift hard as hell with vacuum modulation...
Last edited by Pro Built Automatics; Mar 7, 2005 at 02:20 AM.
230ish pounds sounds alot
Last edited by Pro Built Automatics; Mar 7, 2005 at 02:30 AM.
Trending Topics
trans, vs "letting the computer do the work". Computer
is easily fooled whilst always trying to be smart. A month or
two of it deciding it can "get away with" a little less line
pressure than makes the clutches hold, and you have a
nice new varnished-up set of clutches. Especially at part
throttle where you may be putting out substantial torque,
but the PCM is still "allowed" to be making fussy line pressure
adjustments based on its stale factory, EPA/CAFE-oriented
decision weights.
Vac mod is not going to go changing its mind on you, and
in general the things that would fault, drive it to full pressure
(like the hose coming off). You have less freedom to tailor it
(like, if you wanted Cadillac shifts at high vacuum and NHRA
shifts by 25% throttle, too bad, it's probably linear and you
have to just like it) but I reckon by the time you break your
first one, you're over the Cadillac expectation.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time


