Is this a good dyno for an ST-3500???
Before ST-3500:
328.6 RWHP
344.5 RWTQ
With ST-3500 (unlocked)
314.1 RWHP
370.7 RWTQ
What do you all think. Good or not? See sig for mods.
<strong>The only accurate way of testing out a converter is the track. <img src="gr_grin.gif" border="0"> </strong><hr></blockquote>
that is so true!!! <img src="gr_grin.gif" border="0">
seriously though..you didn't loose to much at all by my standards, but you picked up major major torque!!
<strong>Why would there be a loss of HP if the Yank is more efficient than the stock converter?</strong><hr></blockquote>
It just adds to the mystery of dynoing an A4 w/converter. <img src="images/icons/confused.gif" border="0">
Trending Topics
Get it to the track, and watch it shine. You can't beat the performance of a good torque converter! <img src="graemlins/burnout.gif" border="0" alt="[Burnout]" />
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Stabbing the throttle on a car that's already going 70mph on a chassis dyno does little to show torque multiplication of the converter and makes the looser converters look very inefficient compared to the stock converters. Stabbing the throttle from a dead stop shows everything.

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2022 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 S&B CAI, Corsa catback.
2023 Corvette 3LT Z51 soon to be modified.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
[ January 16, 2002: Message edited by: Loco ]</p>
Before ST3500:
312rwhp 325tq
After ST3500:
307rwhp 361tq
Between the two dyno's I went from clogged cats to no cats, so that is why I didn't lose as much as you guys did. I'd say your losses sound about right. As Patrick G said, those numbers aren't real accurate anyway so you shouldn't sweat it. I clicked off a 1/4 ET whih is on average 8 tenths of a second better with the ST3500 so I couldn't be more pleased, why should I care if on paper my SS has 5rwhp less if I'm runnning almost a whole second quicker at the track? <img src="gr_grin.gif" border="0"> <img src="gr_grin.gif" border="0"> <img src="gr_grin.gif" border="0">






