Automatic Transmission 2-Speed thru 10-Speed GM Autos | Converters | Shift Kits
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

going from 2:73 to 3:73...worth it?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-06-2006, 03:31 AM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
redformulaws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bakersfield,CA
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default going from 2:73 to 3:73...worth it?

just ordered a 4000 stall for my formula ws6 and i have 2:73 gears and im wondering if it is even worth it to upgrade to 3:73's? all i have is slp lid kit w/ MAF, loud mouth, HP tuners... and people say i will be good for mid to low 12's with this setup...now will the 3:73's show improvements??? need ur insights, thanks.
Old 07-06-2006, 08:44 AM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
luvmeZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Keller, Texas DFW
Posts: 1,877
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by redformulaws6
just ordered a 4000 stall for my formula ws6 and i have 2:73 gears and im wondering if it is even worth it to upgrade to 3:73's? all i have is slp lid kit w/ MAF, loud mouth, HP tuners... and people say i will be good for mid to low 12's with this setup...now will the 3:73's show improvements??? need ur insights, thanks.
yes, get the 3.73s.
Old 07-06-2006, 10:40 AM
  #3  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (30)
 
EDS01SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Hampton Virginia
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

yes get the 3.73s!
Old 07-06-2006, 11:26 AM
  #4  
11 Second Club
 
HaulinHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: tampa fla
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yep!!!!
Old 07-06-2006, 11:48 AM
  #5  
Tech Resident
 
ChocoTaco369's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Philly
Posts: 5,117
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

i say no. gear swaps on stalled cars are known to feel like a huge gain, then you take it to the track and you net a tenth. since you're making a big gear jump, you'll likely see 2 tenths.

but what else will you see?

well, say good-bye to 2-3mpg easy. i will never get rid of my 2.73's. i like my 21-22mpg. if i wanted 18mpg i'd get some 3.73's.

your car has a 10-bolt right? well, your 10-bolt LOVES that automatic transmission + 2.73 combo. switching to 3.73's and running at the track will cut your rear's life into a fraction of what it is now. if you're so set on gears. put that money toward a 12-bolt instead and then get the 12-bolt with 3.73's.

want 3.73's in a 4 speed auto? say hello to engine wear and a shortened engine lifespan!

you're gonna launch a 3.73 car with a 4000 stall? lol good luck getting any traction at all. i take back what i said, you may actually LOSE time on your slip til you learn how to drive that. drag radials may even be useless. if anything, 2.73's will help you get traction.

buying 3.73's is totally stupid IMO. the lost mileage and the lost life on your rear PLUS the $500+ install on a stupid 10-bolt is a waste of money. on a car with a stall as big as that, the ONLY purpose i can see is to make the stall feel tighter. you're gonna blow 3mpg and your 10-bolt's life to make your car tighter? what a waste.
Old 07-06-2006, 12:04 PM
  #6  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Roarin_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Kissimmee, FL
Posts: 4,567
Received 46 Likes on 43 Posts

Default

^^^ Don't be so hasty on changing your gears, think about the cons as well as the pros which in this case the stall will make up for.
Old 07-06-2006, 01:53 PM
  #7  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (12)
 
GoFast908Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 3,371
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

i have 2.73s and i hated them.....until i got a stall. With a 3000 stall, i LOVE my 2.73. When i get a 12bolt, i may switch to 3.23, but no higher. But I'll also be running 500rwhp, with that 12bolt, so i won't need high gears.
Old 07-06-2006, 02:09 PM
  #8  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Roarin_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Kissimmee, FL
Posts: 4,567
Received 46 Likes on 43 Posts

Default

When I go to a 12 bolt, I may opt for 3.08s
Old 07-06-2006, 02:14 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
monicaz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: DFW
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wow, got a bunch of pansies in here it looks like.
I went from 3.23's to 4.10's and I will never go back. You will notice a loss in mpg, and traction on street tires, but get some decent tires, and it's a whole world of difference. I have a 4200 stall and I'd still like to go a little looser. And btw, this is my dd car, and it drives great.
Old 07-06-2006, 02:15 PM
  #10  
Tech Resident
 
ChocoTaco369's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Philly
Posts: 5,117
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Roarin_8
When I go to a 12 bolt, I may opt for 3.08s
FWIW, 3.08's are get the best mileage on an f-body, even better than 2.73's. they do much better in city driving since they shift faster and the gain in highway rpm's is too small to offset the increase in city mpg. if i ever needed a 12-bolt, i'd get pretty high gears too unless gas went back down to $1.30/gallon for 91 octane
Old 07-06-2006, 02:16 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
monicaz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: DFW
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Oh, and one more thing. Great move with the stall, now all you need is a complimenting cam... like an Ms3 or something similar.
Old 07-06-2006, 02:17 PM
  #12  
Tech Resident
 
ChocoTaco369's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Philly
Posts: 5,117
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by monicaz28
Wow, got a bunch of pansies in here it looks like.
not pansies, we just know better than to **** away $600 for something that nets us a tenth in the quarter mile, beats up our rear, ruins our tires and kills our mpg (when paired with a stall). i believe you meant geniuses instead of pansies
Old 07-06-2006, 02:28 PM
  #13  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Roarin_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Kissimmee, FL
Posts: 4,567
Received 46 Likes on 43 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ChocoTaco369
not pansies, we just know better than to **** away $600 for something that nets us a tenth in the quarter mile, beats up our rear, ruins our tires and kills our mpg (when paired with a stall). i believe you meant geniuses instead of pansies
I drive more highway miles than city especially my trips from NYC to FL and back (can't wait for that to finally end). Filling up 4 times for that trip is great!!
Old 07-06-2006, 02:32 PM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
monicaz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: DFW
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ChocoTaco369
not pansies, we just know better than to **** away $600 for something that nets us a tenth in the quarter mile, beats up our rear, ruins our tires and kills our mpg (when paired with a stall). i believe you meant geniuses instead of pansies
I paid $250 for my gears installed. You gotta pay to play, and anyone who just ordered a 4000 stall can't be too worried about mpg.
Old 07-06-2006, 02:45 PM
  #15  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Roarin_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Kissimmee, FL
Posts: 4,567
Received 46 Likes on 43 Posts

Default

That's the great thing about lockup.
Old 07-06-2006, 02:55 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
monicaz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: DFW
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Roarin_8
That's the great thing about lockup.
Yeah, I agree with that for sure. Mine is a lock up, and I don't think I'd be able to stand it if it didn't... but you've still got a decent amount of slippage that is going to affect mpg. The lock up feature is the only reason I won't switch to an 8" race converter.
Old 07-06-2006, 02:59 PM
  #17  
11 Second Club
 
HaulinHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: tampa fla
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

You guys are missing the whole point !!If you overthink every mod u will never have fun with your car.There are pro and cons to every mod,i put a big cam in and i know the motor wont last as long as it would with the stocker.Same thing goes for a converter,you will eventually have to rebuid you trans,BIGGER,BETTER ,STRONGER.Mod and have fun.
Old 07-06-2006, 03:04 PM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
monicaz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: DFW
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HaulinHawk
You guys are missing the whole point !!If you overthink every mod u will never have fun with your car.There are pro and cons to every mod,i put a big cam in and i know the motor wont last as long as it would with the stocker.Same thing goes for a converter,you will eventually have to rebuid you trans,BIGGER,BETTER ,STRONGER.Mod and have fun.
Finally someone who knows what they're talking about.
Old 07-06-2006, 07:25 PM
  #19  
TECH Apprentice
 
angel71rs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: TX
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I was disappointed when I found out my newly acquired 98Z had 2.73s. But after researching the boards, I think it's a blessing in disguise. Guys are getting excellent times w/2.73s, and the threads I found where guys said they got very little going from 2.73 to 3.42s/3.73s were real eye openers. The greater strenght of the physically larger 2.73 pinion gear over the necessarily smaller 3.73 pinion gear is an added bonus. Makes it much more likely the 7.5 10 bolt will live.

I ended up liking the way the 2.73s feel around town. I used to have an 89 Formula 350 w/the 3.27 9 bolt. I used to hate making a right turn onto a street with traffic coming. Too much gas and the tires would just spin, rear would try to swing around. Too little and the tranny would short shift into 2nd = blah acceleration. The 2.73s are an improvement. I can moderate the throttle much better to prevent excess spin without having to worry about an early shift into 2nd.

Better gas mileage and less wear on the engine are an added bonus. I've come to think I really lucked out getting a car w/2.73s.
Old 07-06-2006, 07:47 PM
  #20  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (19)
 
99Hawk262's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Little Rock
Posts: 2,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I say do what you want. There are obvious pros.....there are obvious cons. I agree with the comment about the 4000 stall and gas mileage...must not be too big of a deal. I have 3.23's with a 3500 stall and I get 23 MPG on the highway. City I'm not sure of yet, but it certainly isn't what I used to get. I may have seen a 2-3 MPG loss, but the gain is well worth it. If you think 3.73's are for you, do it. There are many on here who have them and love them. If you are worried about the added wear to engine/rearend, then skip to a cam. Even though a cam will sacrifice gas mileage as well.


Quick Reply: going from 2:73 to 3:73...worth it?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:48 AM.