Automatic Transmission 2-Speed thru 10-Speed GM Autos | Converters | Shift Kits
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Does A Th400 Eat More Power Than A 4l60

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-16-2007, 03:33 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
MOSTDELUXE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Does A Th400 Eat More Power Than A 4l60

Iam putting a turbo 400 with a brake in my car and was wondering if anyone has track times? difference in 60ft and e.t. And if it ate anymore power.
Old 09-16-2007, 03:41 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (34)
 
sevanseriesta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Gardner, KS
Posts: 1,293
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

people see quite a bit of difference in 1/4 mile times, but you will lost power on the Dyno! People have lost as much as 70HP on a dyno
Old 09-16-2007, 03:51 PM
  #3  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
MOSTDELUXE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

what kind of difference in et?
Old 09-16-2007, 08:27 PM
  #4  
TECH Regular
 
john kilgore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: burbank ca
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default th400

the th400 has 2.48 first gear ratio and the 4L60 has 3.06 first. maybe a 2.75 first from ATI would help.
Old 09-16-2007, 08:53 PM
  #5  
Tech Resident
 
ChocoTaco369's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Philly
Posts: 5,117
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I've heard of people losing literally 90 rwhp Seriously. Of course, that person was pretty heavily modded...but then again, if you weren't heavily modded, you wouldn't need a TH400
Old 09-16-2007, 09:23 PM
  #6  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (25)
 
performabuilt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: BLOOMSBURG PA
Posts: 10,858
Received 78 Likes on 56 Posts

Default

I dont know the amount of loss but the internals are quit a bit heavier. so there will be some loss. As for et the biggest loss might be the 60ft due to the higher first ratio.
__________________
Built..PerformaBuilt..Tough

Call 888-744-6542


Old 09-16-2007, 09:33 PM
  #7  
Banned
 
Z ROADSTER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Shreveport,Louisiana
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MOSTDELUXE
Iam putting a turbo 400 with a brake in my car and was wondering if anyone has track times? difference in 60ft and e.t. And if it ate anymore power.

Pretty big loss in power & pretty big increase in weight. The only experiance I've had with the turbo 400 wasn't good.Eats horsepower & torque and believe it or not , its not as reliable as the turbo 350. Everything about the TH-350 is better than the 400. And thats the real truth .
Old 09-16-2007, 11:49 PM
  #8  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (44)
 
XpEdItIoUs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

You guys have to realize that a th400 is unlocked. Just because you make less power on a dyno with a th400, it dosn't mean you car gets slower
Old 09-17-2007, 01:25 AM
  #9  
PBA
TECH Resident
 
PBA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 944
Received 75 Likes on 47 Posts

Default

"Pretty big loss in power & pretty big increase in weight. The only experience I've had with the turbo 400 wasn't good. Eats horsepower & torque and believe it or not, its not as reliable as the turbo 350. Everything about the TH-350 is better than the 400. And thats the real truth."

It is just the opposite, when it comes to reliability. The TH400 will eat up a little more HP than a TH350 in a vehicle that has a very high numerical rear end ratio. It is very hard to do a direct comparison on a dyno because of the torque converter. When you can make a transmission change at the drags and use the same torque converter, then you can see the differences. There are so many little things that can be done to help out the transmission from eating so much HP. Each transmission can be helped out by using lighter parts, roller bearings in certain areas, lowering main line pressure after the 2-3 shift occurs, Turbulator type steels in the 2nd & 3rd gear clutch packs, and the low/reverse clutch in the TH350, reducing the amount of clutches used in the low/reverse area in the TH 350, etc. The TH400 uses a low/reverse band and once it is off there is no drag as when compared to the low/reverse clutches in a TH350 which eat up more HP the higher the rpm.
Old 09-17-2007, 01:27 AM
  #10  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
revtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: OMG I'm in Kansas
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Z ROADSTER
Pretty big loss in power & pretty big increase in weight. The only experiance I've had with the turbo 400 wasn't good.Eats horsepower & torque and believe it or not , its not as reliable as the turbo 350. Everything about the TH-350 is better than the 400. And thats the real truth .
I would LOVE for you to back that up with technical info. LOVE IT.

I know my car got faster with the TH400 because I started beating guys I could not beat when the 60E was in it. I don't have times yet to prove it beyond a doubt but everyone agrees the car got faster.

Last edited by revtime; 09-17-2007 at 01:35 AM.
Old 09-20-2007, 09:09 PM
  #11  
Banned
 
Z ROADSTER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Shreveport,Louisiana
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool Th350 More Dependable Than Th400

Originally Posted by revtime
I would LOVE for you to back that up with technical info. LOVE IT.

I know my car got faster with the TH400 because I started beating guys I could not beat when the 60E was in it. I don't have times yet to prove it beyond a doubt but everyone agrees the car got faster.
Stock 350 compared to a stock 400 , both behind a small block , which one would have the weight & horsepower advantage ? And as to which trans is the most dependable , in my experience the TH350 out performed my TH400 & outlasted the 400.
Now you mention the " 60E " which never entered the equation. I'm just speaking from my past experiences with the two tranny's. Not trying to start an argument here.
Old 09-20-2007, 09:32 PM
  #12  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (44)
 
XpEdItIoUs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Z ROADSTER
Stock 350 compared to a stock 400 , both behind a small block , which one would have the weight & horsepower advantage ? And as to which trans is the most dependable , in my experience the TH350 out performed my TH400 & outlasted the 400.
Now you mention the " 60E " which never entered the equation. I'm just speaking from my past experiences with the two tranny's. Not trying to start an argument here.
Why do the big horsepower guys use a 400 then if its not as reliable?
Old 09-20-2007, 10:07 PM
  #13  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
ncnumber8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Your mph might be down w/ a TH400 but your et will be as good or quicker w/ the 400. As far as a 350 outlasting a 400, thats a new one for me. A friend of mine builds 350/400 on the side (to feed his racing addiction) and he said even a stock 400 will outlast a built 350 in most cases. That depends alot on who builds the 350 though.
Old 09-21-2007, 03:11 AM
  #14  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
revtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: OMG I'm in Kansas
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Z ROADSTER
Stock 350 compared to a stock 400 , both behind a small block , which one would have the weight & horsepower advantage ? And as to which trans is the most dependable , in my experience the TH350 out performed my TH400 & outlasted the 400.
Now you mention the " 60E " which never entered the equation. I'm just speaking from my past experiences with the two tranny's. Not trying to start an argument here.
There is a difference between an arguement and a debate. I love to debate.

Now, weight and horsepower I will give you to a certain point as once you get to enough horsepower that it kills the TH350 then the weight and horsepower advantage gained you nothing.
I have no idea what condition your TH350 and TH400 that your basing your expierence on were in.
I do know that if you compare apples to apples the TH400 will last longer and take more abuse than a TH350 both built street/strip.
Having said that I have seen built TH350s take alot of power but I have seen TH400s get criminally abused and suffer no ill effects.
I have had both over the years and my current Rossler TH400 has convinced me beyond a shadow of a doubt that I can have reliability, performance, with no compromises.
Well to be honest the OD gear is the only compromise and I am getting used to it being gone.



Quick Reply: Does A Th400 Eat More Power Than A 4l60



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:18 AM.