Automotive News, Media & Press Television | Magazines | Industry News

ZL1 Wins overall vs new GT500

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-13-2012, 09:22 PM
  #61  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Theblacknightls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: San Antonio ,TX
Posts: 559
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by 409CISecondGen
04-06 GTO's spanked GT's...
^very true but no cobras?
Old 06-13-2012, 09:26 PM
  #62  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
409CISecondGen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Theblacknightls1
^very true but no cobras?
Cobra's cost quite a bit more. I love 03-04 Cobra's btw, but not the new ones.
Old 06-13-2012, 09:30 PM
  #63  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Theblacknightls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: San Antonio ,TX
Posts: 559
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by 409CISecondGen
Cobra's cost quite a bit more. I love 03-04 Cobra's btw, but not the new ones.
I see them around the same price as your goat.
Old 06-13-2012, 09:30 PM
  #64  
TECH Resident
 
1ltcap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Theblacknightls1
Ok no one told gm to stop making the camaro but the cobra was faster and even 8yrs later when they brought the camaro back the 03 cobra is still faster. They had a long time to prepare for the cars ford brought out.
bolded....i keep getting told i'm full of it when i say that.


and wait? are you saying the 5th gen is having trouble comparing to an 8 year old car? evil:
Old 06-13-2012, 09:33 PM
  #65  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
409CISecondGen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Theblacknightls1
I see them around the same price as your goat.
The fact that they cost $5K more than a GTO when they were new and now cost the same speaks volumes, doesn't it?
Old 06-13-2012, 09:37 PM
  #66  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
409CISecondGen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

BTW, has anyone noticed that 10 years ago a Cobra cost $35K and today a GT500 costs $55K?
Old 06-13-2012, 10:01 PM
  #67  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Johnnystock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,675
Received 38 Likes on 25 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by unit213
Straight line performance is flat out an embarrassment.
GM flapping their gums about the ZL1 dominating the GT500 is an embarrassment. Being happy with "the twisties" is an embarrassment. Ford kicked GM's ***. That should be an embarrassment.

Handling? Is this Honda tech.com?
I agree with you on this one...

BUT, since day 1 the Camaro was out, we only hear plp bitching here; heavy, slow, ugly, pig..blah blah blah.

With the ZL1, all the haters can just shut up cause GM made this fat pig the fastest around the course!!! For cheaper than the GT500 too!

On the other hand(back to the reason I agree with you LOL), GM should have put the LS9 right from the start into the ZL1 and CTSV. I think this engine is a waste of money to produce instead of producing mass LS9 engines(..well I hope so lol).

So Ford won this round in my book. 2 cars with 6-7mph difference is a shame and cannot be compared.

Still for the price, the ZL1 is an outstanding package.

Last edited by Johnnystock; 06-13-2012 at 10:07 PM.
Old 06-13-2012, 10:20 PM
  #68  
TECH Resident
 
1ltcap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Johnnystock
I agree with you on this one...

BUT, since day 1 the Camaro was out, we only hear plp bitching here; heavy, slow, ugly, pig..blah blah blah.

With the ZL1, all the haters can just shut up cause GM made this fat pig the fastest around the course!!! For cheaper than the GT500 too!

On the other hand(back to the reason I agree with you LOL), GM should have put the LS9 right from the start into the ZL1 and CTSV. I think this engine is a waste of money to produce instead of producing mass LS9 engines(..well I hope so lol).

So Ford won this round in my book. 2 cars with 6-7mph difference is a shame and cannot be compared.

Still for the price, the ZL1 is an outstanding package.
again, bear in mind, most of the guys you see putting the zl1 down on here, are the chevy guys. most of the ford guys seem to be giving it the respect it deserves.......
Old 06-13-2012, 10:26 PM
  #69  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Theblacknightls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: San Antonio ,TX
Posts: 559
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by 409CISecondGen
The fact that they cost $5K more than a GTO when they were new and now cost the same speaks volumes, doesn't it?
Well 05-06 compare to 03-04 the year also maters soo nope lol
Old 06-13-2012, 10:31 PM
  #70  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Theblacknightls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: San Antonio ,TX
Posts: 559
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Johnnystock
I agree with you on this one...

BUT, since day 1 the Camaro was out, we only hear plp bitching here; heavy, slow, ugly, pig..blah blah blah.

With the ZL1, all the haters can just shut up cause GM made this fat pig the fastest around the course!!! For cheaper than the GT500 too!

On the other hand(back to the reason I agree with you LOL), GM should have put the LS9 right from the start into the ZL1 and CTSV. I think this engine is a waste of money to produce instead of producing mass LS9 engines(..well I hope so lol).

So Ford won this round in my book. 2 cars with 6-7mph difference is a shame and cannot be compared.

Still for the price, the ZL1 is an outstanding package.
Zl1 is a nice car. I would just expect a bit more than just handling. 580 hp supercharged v8 motor but still can't trap over 120mph in the 1/4. A all motor 346 fbody is capable with way less horse power and doesn't need FI that's the only reason why I have a hard time siding with it over a gt500
Old 06-13-2012, 10:33 PM
  #71  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
gocartone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Eau Claire-ish, WI
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 409CISecondGen
The fact that they cost $5K more than a GTO when they were new and now cost the same speaks volumes, doesn't it?
It was only a $3k difference when both were new, and 04 Cobras sell for about 1.5X what 04 GT0s do for an apple to apple comparison. What is it with you GTO owners and your Napoleon syndrome?
Old 06-13-2012, 10:41 PM
  #72  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
409CISecondGen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Theblacknightls1
Well 05-06 compare to 03-04 the year also maters soo nope lol
Originally Posted by Theblacknightls1
^very true but no cobras?
You are the one who wanted to compare them lol. My point is its not fair to compare the Cobra to the GTO. You should compare the 04+ Mustang to the 04+ GTO

Originally Posted by gocartone
It was only a $3k difference when both were new, and 04 Cobras sell for about 1.5X what 04 GT0s do for an apple to apple comparison. What is it with you GTO owners and your Napoleon syndrome?
Again, he compared the GTO to the Cobra not me, The Cobra's performance is obviously worth more money. GTO:31795, Cobra's traditionally have alot of dealership markup as evidenced here: :http://www.svtperformance.com/forums...cobra-new.html

I would put the difference after markup at 5K
Old 06-13-2012, 10:43 PM
  #73  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Theblacknightls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: San Antonio ,TX
Posts: 559
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by 409CISecondGen
You are the one who wanted to compare them lol. My point is its not fair to compare the Cobra to the GTO. You should compare the 04+ Mustang to the 04+ GTO
I did 04 mustang cobra you mean 05 gt vs 05 Gto ?
Old 06-13-2012, 10:52 PM
  #74  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
409CISecondGen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 409CISecondGen
04-06 GTO's spanked GT's...
Originally Posted by Theblacknightls1
^very true but no cobras?

Originally Posted by 409CISecondGen
Cobra's cost quite a bit more. I love 03-04 Cobra's btw, but not the new ones.

Originally Posted by Theblacknightls1
I see them around the same price as your goat.
Originally Posted by 409CISecondGen
The fact that they cost $5K more than a GTO when they were new and now cost the same speaks volumes, doesn't it?
Originally Posted by Theblacknightls1
Well 05-06 compare to 03-04 the year also maters soo nope lol
So what you are arguing is that because an older car that cost 20K we should compare it to a car 3 years newer that cost 20K used?

All I am saying is you shouldn't compare a Cobra to a GTO. They are in different leagues
Old 06-13-2012, 11:06 PM
  #75  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
gocartone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Eau Claire-ish, WI
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 409CISecondGen



Again, he compared the GTO to the Cobra not me, The Cobra's performance is obviously worth more money. GTO:31795, Cobra's traditionally have alot of dealership markup as evidenced here: :http://www.svtperformance.com/forums...cobra-new.html

I would put the difference after markup at 5K
Weak argument. You could find them under MSRP too, so it's best just to use the MSRP. So we have a $3k gap from the GTO to the 2004 Cobra, $7k gap from the 2005 GTO to the 2005 GT, and a $9k gap from the 2004 GTO and GT.
Old 06-13-2012, 11:32 PM
  #76  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Johnnystock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,675
Received 38 Likes on 25 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Theblacknightls1
Zl1 is a nice car. I would just expect a bit more than just handling. 580 hp supercharged v8 motor but still can't trap over 120mph in the 1/4. A all motor 346 fbody is capable with way less horse power and doesn't need FI that's the only reason why I have a hard time siding with it over a gt500
A fox 346(LS1?) is a modded car out of the 80-90s. I know youre talking about performance, but those 2 cars just cant be compared at all.

Nut I hoped too that the ZL1 would be a 120-121mph car...just too heavy.
Old 06-14-2012, 06:20 AM
  #77  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Johnnystock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,675
Received 38 Likes on 25 Posts

Default

LOL I was tired yesterday and my reading/writing skills just failed me!
Old 06-14-2012, 07:52 AM
  #78  
TECH Enthusiast
 
JHL88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SC
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by unit213
Straight line performance is flat out an embarrassment.
GM flapping their gums about the ZL1 dominating the GT500 is an embarrassment. Being happy with "the twisties" is an embarrassment. Ford kicked GM's ***. That should be an embarrassment.

Handling? Is this Honda tech.com?
yea.. how so?
Old 06-14-2012, 12:24 PM
  #79  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
gocartone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Eau Claire-ish, WI
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JHL88
yea.. how so?
Because that's what every ricer uses as an excuse for getting their *** kicked by anything with a V8 in it.
Old 06-14-2012, 12:36 PM
  #80  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
adamantium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: From the abyss
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

lol i love it now GM fan boys are track gods, thats the same excuse honda owners use when domestic owners talk about being the fastest at the 1/4. This is hilarious. The ZL1 has failed to compete in the same category as the gt500 in the test that matters most to everyone on here (Whoever says other wise is lieing to themselves).


Quick Reply: ZL1 Wins overall vs new GT500



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:29 PM.