Automotive News, Media & Press Television | Magazines | Industry News

LS7 in camaro? = LUTZ

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-24-2006, 07:47 PM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
ClaySS01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default LS7 in camaro? = LUTZ

Sticky: Lutz: "all the way up to 500hp or whatever size V8 we have". (
For production we would obviously do like we did in the old days -- you would have a popular-priced six-cylinder version, then you step up to an eight, then you step up to the next eight, all the way up to 500 hp or whatever size V-8s we have. Any V-8 engine that General Motors manufactures today is potentially slated for this car. You always would like to keep the Corvette with a few horsepower more than a Camaro. Theoretically, anything is possible.

Last edited by ClaySS01; 01-24-2006 at 07:52 PM.
Old 01-24-2006, 07:51 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
 
JD_AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: St.Charles MO
Posts: 5,801
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Link?
Old 01-24-2006, 07:52 PM
  #3  
Teching In
 
kaptain cap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't see it happening as the LS7:

- is hand-built

- used in the flagship Corvette, the $65,000 Z06 which has a dry-sump oil lubrication system

I can see it happening as a rumored supercharged V-8 (LS9) is on the way for the C6.

Chevy needs to spend more time with the handling of the future Camaro than worrying about a hand-built LS7.
Old 01-24-2006, 07:53 PM
  #4  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
ClaySS01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

its on z28camaro.com 5th Generation Camaro/NAIAS 2006
Old 01-24-2006, 07:56 PM
  #5  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
ClaySS01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

http://web.camaross.com/forums/showthread.php?t=424793
Old 01-24-2006, 09:51 PM
  #6  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
JCurtin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: bellevue ne
Posts: 692
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

well it would be nice to just select the engine without tacking on 10-12000 more dollars. If you want a stripper v8 and nothing else should be able to do it. Unlike dodge with the magnums or charger. Click hemi and you automatically click 10grand.
Old 01-24-2006, 10:29 PM
  #7  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
2002BlackSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Palm Harbor, Fl
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kaptain cap
I don't see it happening as the LS7:

- is hand-built

- used in the flagship Corvette, the $65,000 Z06 which has a dry-sump oil lubrication system

I can see it happening as a rumored supercharged V-8 (LS9) is on the way for the C6.

Chevy needs to spend more time with the handling of the future Camaro than worrying about a hand-built LS7.
He (Lutz) didn't say LS7, he said "500 hp." It's likely, if they offered such an animal, it would be either a new engine, a LS7 in a mass produced form, or only in extremely limited quantities. I don't see them making the effort for very low production numbers, but if there is a 500 hp option, my best guess would be a new (LS5?) or forced induction engine (possibly a supercharged LS2).
Old 01-24-2006, 11:18 PM
  #8  
TECH Junkie
 
WECIV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Gulf Shores and DC
Posts: 3,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I will not buy a FI car, no way in heaven or hell. They need a mass produced LS7. I would buy a 2009 stripped LS7 camaro for 35 grand in a heartbeat.
Old 01-24-2006, 11:32 PM
  #9  
Teching In
 
ma51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think it's smart of him to keep his options open. Look what it took to turn the Caddy CTS into the CTS-V. That project was more like old-fashioned engine-swapping (cutting, relocating stuff etc.) than typical auto-manufacturer engineering work. I imagine Lutz wouldn't want to get stuck in that situation again, and he would demand that the Camaro would be designed to accomodate a lot of different engines.
__________________
AUTIV
Performance-car news, reviews, and history
Old 01-25-2006, 01:30 PM
  #10  
TECH Apprentice
 
Lt1FBoDy209's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yeah why not just make a mass produced ls7 for the camaro. handmade engines are no requirement for a non-supercar sports car
Old 01-25-2006, 01:53 PM
  #11  
On The Tree
 
N20LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Ls7 Camaro

If FORD is going to come out with its 450 HP 5.4 s/c cobra for 06/07. GM should have a mass production LS7 or an LS2 with a forced induction powerplant to power the new CAMARO SS. That's my opinion.
Old 01-25-2006, 02:24 PM
  #12  
On The Tree
 
firecrotch59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kaptain cap
I don't see it happening as the LS7:

- is hand-built

- used in the flagship Corvette, the $65,000 Z06 which has a dry-sump oil lubrication system

I can see it happening as a rumored supercharged V-8 (LS9) is on the way for the C6.

Chevy needs to spend more time with the handling of the future Camaro than worrying about a hand-built LS7.
What about the LT4 that they put in the 93-97 camaro's? That was the flagship engine too and it was very expensive. Made by Lotus.

Edited because I tried to change it before someone read it. Oops too late!!

Last edited by firecrotch59; 01-25-2006 at 02:38 PM.
Old 01-25-2006, 02:34 PM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
zamboxl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sunrise Fl
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by firecrotch59
What about the LT4 that they put in the 93-97 camaro's? That was the flagship engine too and it was very expensive. Made by Lotus.
no the lt5 was made by lotus and very expensive, the lt4 was an upgraded version of the lt1 for the corvette. The expensive lotus engine was only for the zr1 the flagship of flagships at chevy, well atleast at the time.

Last edited by zamboxl; 01-25-2006 at 02:46 PM.
Old 01-25-2006, 02:35 PM
  #14  
On The Tree
 
Cerberus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Up the Bayou
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Lotus = LT5 not LT4
Old 01-25-2006, 02:36 PM
  #15  
Restricted User
iTrader: (9)
 
NOSjohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,692
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The LT4 motor was NOT put in ANY 1993-1996 Camaros. The LT4 was NOT built by Lotus. There were 100 1997 SS Camaros built by SLP that came with the LT4.

The LT5 was developed jointly by England’s Lotus Engineering and GM Powertrain Division and manufactured by MerCruiser in Stillwater, Oklahoma.
Old 01-25-2006, 02:36 PM
  #16  
On The Tree
 
firecrotch59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

haha i just double checked it. and knowticed that by bad. But still, i believe its possible.
Old 01-25-2006, 02:36 PM
  #17  
TECH Junkie
 
WECIV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Gulf Shores and DC
Posts: 3,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

"What about the LT4 that they put in the 93-97 camaro's? That was the flagship engine too and it was very expensive. Made by Lotus."

There were very few LT4 cars and they were expensive and rare. We do not want a limited edition LS6-ish thing. We want a mass produced motor. They can do what you are talking about, but we want a cheap enough to afford car. Something akin to all the Terminators running around.
Old 01-25-2006, 02:39 PM
  #18  
Restricted User
iTrader: (9)
 
NOSjohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,692
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wow....hahaha...mention "LT4" and "Lotus" in the same sentence and get pounced upon! Poor fella !
Old 01-25-2006, 02:41 PM
  #19  
On The Tree
 
firecrotch59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wasnt the lt5 built by Mercury Marine?? Or did they change their name to Mercruiser?
Old 01-25-2006, 02:42 PM
  #20  
On The Tree
 
firecrotch59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Haha I tried to change it but I had like 6 posts before I could!!


Quick Reply: LS7 in camaro? = LUTZ



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:16 AM.