Why arent the muscle cars priced cheaper?
#61
Ok, I think that I get what you are saying. However, the M3's are pretty much maxed out on power unless you rebuild the lower end. You cant put too much more than the 5-6psi of boost without destroying it. In order to run higher boost, you have to rebuild the lower end. The stock CR on vettes is much lower, which you can get away with putting 8-12psi in there and get away with it. Which will add another 200HP. So saying that an M3 engine and a ZO6 engine will gain the same power with the same mods is true, but the ZO6 will be faster every time just due to the more displacement.
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/d...319247da7b.htm
I was two cars back
#62
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://tunertrader.vidiac.com/catego...b4c080ba8a.htm
I love this video, becuase it shows two cars with very different power plants. I can understand peoples logic if this was 1993, when knowone was aware of what FI can do. But to say a car is faster with more displacement is false. As you can see here, an evo with less power, less torque, aerodynamics beats a car with 3 times the displacement.
I love this video, becuase it shows two cars with very different power plants. I can understand peoples logic if this was 1993, when knowone was aware of what FI can do. But to say a car is faster with more displacement is false. As you can see here, an evo with less power, less torque, aerodynamics beats a car with 3 times the displacement.
#63
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Heres a vid of my friends racing. Ones a turbo Camaro making 505hp 550lbft and a civic making 500hp and 320lbft.
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/d...319247da7b.htm
I was two cars back
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/d...319247da7b.htm
I was two cars back
#64
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOWm0rVVJys
M6 weighs roughly 1000lbs more, but makes 50hp more than the Z06.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGmCpNeyNIM
The vettes setup is not ideal for top end racing.
#65
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver,[KITSILANO].B.C. Canada *WestCoast*
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Honestly what the ****, 40,000 dollers for a challanger?
Why not make it 30K and sell them like hot cakes, 40 grand gets you alot of cars in this day and age.
And the camaro better not be up there either, theres a reason why the mustang does so good. Its priced right, GM better put the camaro around what the mustang is.
Why not make it 30K and sell them like hot cakes, 40 grand gets you alot of cars in this day and age.
And the camaro better not be up there either, theres a reason why the mustang does so good. Its priced right, GM better put the camaro around what the mustang is.
#66
14 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (36)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago, Il
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It doesnt matter anyway, because that video proves nothing. How do you know that those are the real outputs? From a guy who is nothing more than a troll who will say anything to TRY to prove his point. Ignore his posts and you will be better off. Half the **** he says is made up, the other half if exaggerated.
#67
Yes, and the EVO was running a lot more boost than the vette. But we are at the same thing again. Modded cars with small engines can beat other modded cars with big engines. It all comes down to what they have done under the hood. Pound for pound (psi) the bigger displacement engines will rule all. Think about it. If you were to put 20psi into an LS1 or the Viper V10. You are talking nearly 800RWHP and TQ. Not to mention that the vipers and vettes look a hell of a lot better than an EVO or Civic.
http://i140.photobucket.com/albums/r...ts/855rwhp.jpg
^ that was 21psi
http://i140.photobucket.com/albums/r...whpoverlay.jpg
^19psi
350z heads flow more than the Ls1. This is why they're able to produce so much power with little boost compared to most cars.
This is on this forum in the FI section:
This is one of our customer cars. It is equipped with the following mods:
-Speed Inc 382"
-03 Z06 Cam
-RGR stage 2 heads
-M6
-Moser 12 bolt
-Speed Inc Fuel system
-ATI D1SC w/8 rib conversion
-Speed Inc/Griffin custom front mount intercooler conversion
-3"-2.5" True duals to the bumper
- 60# Injectors
-Stock PCM
14lbs of boost
http://www.ls1speed.com/pictures/dynorun040.jpg
Compared to a 350z at 14psi same car as above.
http://i140.photobucket.com/albums/r...sports/658.jpg
#68
It doesnt matter anyway, because that video proves nothing. How do you know that those are the real outputs? From a guy who is nothing more than a troll who will say anything to TRY to prove his point. Ignore his posts and you will be better off. Half the **** he says is made up, the other half if exaggerated.
Last edited by suprastars; 02-20-2008 at 08:17 PM.
#69
It doesnt matter anyway, because that video proves nothing. How do you know that those are the real outputs? From a guy who is nothing more than a troll who will say anything to TRY to prove his point. Ignore his posts and you will be better off. Half the **** he says is made up, the other half if exaggerated.
#70
#71
To be honest, just to **** two people off and that mzmoora and dailydriver. Ill conceed though! Ill stop instigating and causing unnecessary arguements!
#72
14 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (36)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago, Il
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I made 680rwhp and 710lbft in my 350z with 17psi. On the same dyno, with similar turbokits, this same 350z made:
http://i140.photobucket.com/albums/r...ts/855rwhp.jpg
^ that was 21psi
http://i140.photobucket.com/albums/r...whpoverlay.jpg
^19psi
350z heads flow more than the Ls1. This is why they're able to produce so much power with little boost compared to most cars.
This is on this forum in the FI section:
This is one of our customer cars. It is equipped with the following mods:
-Speed Inc 382"
-03 Z06 Cam
-RGR stage 2 heads
-M6
-Moser 12 bolt
-Speed Inc Fuel system
-ATI D1SC w/8 rib conversion
-Speed Inc/Griffin custom front mount intercooler conversion
-3"-2.5" True duals to the bumper
- 60# Injectors
-Stock PCM
14lbs of boost
http://www.ls1speed.com/pictures/dynorun040.jpg
Compared to a 350z at 14psi same car as above.
http://i140.photobucket.com/albums/r...sports/658.jpg
http://i140.photobucket.com/albums/r...ts/855rwhp.jpg
^ that was 21psi
http://i140.photobucket.com/albums/r...whpoverlay.jpg
^19psi
350z heads flow more than the Ls1. This is why they're able to produce so much power with little boost compared to most cars.
This is on this forum in the FI section:
This is one of our customer cars. It is equipped with the following mods:
-Speed Inc 382"
-03 Z06 Cam
-RGR stage 2 heads
-M6
-Moser 12 bolt
-Speed Inc Fuel system
-ATI D1SC w/8 rib conversion
-Speed Inc/Griffin custom front mount intercooler conversion
-3"-2.5" True duals to the bumper
- 60# Injectors
-Stock PCM
14lbs of boost
http://www.ls1speed.com/pictures/dynorun040.jpg
Compared to a 350z at 14psi same car as above.
http://i140.photobucket.com/albums/r...sports/658.jpg
#73
Restricted User
iTrader: (24)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Fleetwood, PA
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cylinders plays little role in determining power! Liters, head flow, VE, compression ratio, dohc, etc.... all determine power, not how many cylinders.
So in theory, I guess a 3.0 liter V8 has more potential than a 4.2 liter 6cylinder
You do understand that a 3.0 liter V10 F1 car(900hp) produces more power n/a than any stroked LS7 or 8.2 liter V10 viper. It is harder to produce power the larger you go in displacement.
Lets see here:
Porsche 415hp 3.8 liters n/a
Ls3 Vette 450hp 6.2 liters
Ls1 5.7 liters 320hp
M3 333hp 3.2 liters
M5 500hp 5.0 liters
350z(07) 312hp
Viper 8.2 liters 600hp
Do you see a trend here. See how lower reving motor/pushrod cant compete with high reving dohc setups. Head flow is the key here. Hence the reason why they offer 4 valve heads for ls1's. And the reason why Dodge was going to offer a Dohc setup on the current viper, but decided against it due to cost.
So in theory, I guess a 3.0 liter V8 has more potential than a 4.2 liter 6cylinder
You do understand that a 3.0 liter V10 F1 car(900hp) produces more power n/a than any stroked LS7 or 8.2 liter V10 viper. It is harder to produce power the larger you go in displacement.
Lets see here:
Porsche 415hp 3.8 liters n/a
Ls3 Vette 450hp 6.2 liters
Ls1 5.7 liters 320hp
M3 333hp 3.2 liters
M5 500hp 5.0 liters
350z(07) 312hp
Viper 8.2 liters 600hp
Do you see a trend here. See how lower reving motor/pushrod cant compete with high reving dohc setups. Head flow is the key here. Hence the reason why they offer 4 valve heads for ls1's. And the reason why Dodge was going to offer a Dohc setup on the current viper, but decided against it due to cost.
However, I will clarify what I meant when I said that more cylinders = more potential. That comment assumes same size cylinders. No **** a 4.0l V6 is going to be capable of more than a 3.0l V8.
Oh and you are wrong when you say that cylinders have little to do with power. They are more important than just about any other aspect of a motor. Most of the aspects you mentioned, such as flow, VE, and compression ratio, are all dependent on the cylinder size and resulting combustion chamber size/shape.
OHV/OHC/DOHC actually has VERY little to do with power output. OHC engines simply have to spin higher to attain the same power that OHV engines do at a given RPM.
#74
14 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (36)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago, Il
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.my350z.com/forum/showthre...33#post3335620
It gets better. So it is a 4.2l stroker, twin turbo shop car with custom prototype cams that you are comparing to a supercharged customer car with a factory stock grind.
Edit- I forgot to add that the 350Z is also on 105 octane.
It gets better. So it is a 4.2l stroker, twin turbo shop car with custom prototype cams that you are comparing to a supercharged customer car with a factory stock grind.
Edit- I forgot to add that the 350Z is also on 105 octane.
#75
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
But everything is from a mixed parts bin, and really the only thing new is the apperance of the car
So the price shouldnt be 40K for somthing so simple....
This thing better perform well
So the price shouldnt be 40K for somthing so simple....
This thing better perform well
#77
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
They say there maybe a 5.7 version along with the V6
#78
#79
That is the propblem, right there. The "well to do" set needs to have the Z06, ZR1, CST-V, STS-V, M5, M6, AMG, etc cars marketed to them. Leave the muscle car marketing to us in the rapidly disappearing middle class.