Automotive News, Media & Press Television | Magazines | Industry News

Why arent the muscle cars priced cheaper?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-20-2008, 07:18 PM
  #61  
Banned
 
suprastars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jwindbigler
Ok, I think that I get what you are saying. However, the M3's are pretty much maxed out on power unless you rebuild the lower end. You cant put too much more than the 5-6psi of boost without destroying it. In order to run higher boost, you have to rebuild the lower end. The stock CR on vettes is much lower, which you can get away with putting 8-12psi in there and get away with it. Which will add another 200HP. So saying that an M3 engine and a ZO6 engine will gain the same power with the same mods is true, but the ZO6 will be faster every time just due to the more displacement.
Heres a vid of my friends racing. Ones a turbo Camaro making 505hp 550lbft and a civic making 500hp and 320lbft.

http://videos.streetfire.net/video/d...319247da7b.htm

I was two cars back
Old 02-20-2008, 07:44 PM
  #62  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (20)
 
jwindbigler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by suprastars
http://tunertrader.vidiac.com/catego...b4c080ba8a.htm

I love this video, becuase it shows two cars with very different power plants. I can understand peoples logic if this was 1993, when knowone was aware of what FI can do. But to say a car is faster with more displacement is false. As you can see here, an evo with less power, less torque, aerodynamics beats a car with 3 times the displacement.
Yes, and the EVO was running a lot more boost than the vette. But we are at the same thing again. Modded cars with small engines can beat other modded cars with big engines. It all comes down to what they have done under the hood. Pound for pound (psi) the bigger displacement engines will rule all. Think about it. If you were to put 20psi into an LS1 or the Viper V10. You are talking nearly 800RWHP and TQ. Not to mention that the vipers and vettes look a hell of a lot better than an EVO or Civic.
Old 02-20-2008, 07:45 PM
  #63  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (20)
 
jwindbigler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by suprastars
Heres a vid of my friends racing. Ones a turbo Camaro making 505hp 550lbft and a civic making 500hp and 320lbft.

http://videos.streetfire.net/video/d...319247da7b.htm

I was two cars back
How much do you want to bet if they would have gone past 140, the vette would have destroyed it. Rolling mile, that vette should win. Key word "should".
Old 02-20-2008, 07:54 PM
  #64  
Banned
 
suprastars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jwindbigler
How much do you want to bet if they would have gone past 140, the vette would have destroyed it. Rolling mile, that vette should win. Key word "should".
Wrong again. The vette gearing is 1:1 in 4th, making 5th and 6th overdrives. Yes it will reach 190mph, but it takes forever to get there.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOWm0rVVJys

M6 weighs roughly 1000lbs more, but makes 50hp more than the Z06.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGmCpNeyNIM

The vettes setup is not ideal for top end racing.
Old 02-20-2008, 07:58 PM
  #65  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
NHRAMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver,[KITSILANO].B.C. Canada *WestCoast*
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb

Originally Posted by slick1851
Honestly what the ****, 40,000 dollers for a challanger?

Why not make it 30K and sell them like hot cakes, 40 grand gets you alot of cars in this day and age.


And the camaro better not be up there either, theres a reason why the mustang does so good. Its priced right, GM better put the camaro around what the mustang is.
Musclecars are marketed to mostly well to do people like myself....the 6-bangers will be alot cheaper..even in the 60's..Musclecars were more than priced above your usual gas jockey. mind you..they are more now..even with inflation..but still..
Old 02-20-2008, 08:06 PM
  #66  
14 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (36)
 
mzoomora's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago, Il
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jwindbigler
How much do you want to bet if they would have gone past 140, the vette would have destroyed it. Rolling mile, that vette should win. Key word "should".
It doesnt matter anyway, because that video proves nothing. How do you know that those are the real outputs? From a guy who is nothing more than a troll who will say anything to TRY to prove his point. Ignore his posts and you will be better off. Half the **** he says is made up, the other half if exaggerated.
Old 02-20-2008, 08:11 PM
  #67  
Banned
 
suprastars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jwindbigler
Yes, and the EVO was running a lot more boost than the vette. But we are at the same thing again. Modded cars with small engines can beat other modded cars with big engines. It all comes down to what they have done under the hood. Pound for pound (psi) the bigger displacement engines will rule all. Think about it. If you were to put 20psi into an LS1 or the Viper V10. You are talking nearly 800RWHP and TQ. Not to mention that the vipers and vettes look a hell of a lot better than an EVO or Civic.
I made 680rwhp and 710lbft in my 350z with 17psi. On the same dyno, with similar turbokits, this same 350z made:

http://i140.photobucket.com/albums/r...ts/855rwhp.jpg

^ that was 21psi


http://i140.photobucket.com/albums/r...whpoverlay.jpg

^19psi

350z heads flow more than the Ls1. This is why they're able to produce so much power with little boost compared to most cars.


This is on this forum in the FI section:

This is one of our customer cars. It is equipped with the following mods:
-Speed Inc 382"
-03 Z06 Cam
-RGR stage 2 heads
-M6
-Moser 12 bolt
-Speed Inc Fuel system
-ATI D1SC w/8 rib conversion
-Speed Inc/Griffin custom front mount intercooler conversion
-3"-2.5" True duals to the bumper
- 60# Injectors
-Stock PCM

14lbs of boost

http://www.ls1speed.com/pictures/dynorun040.jpg

Compared to a 350z at 14psi same car as above.

http://i140.photobucket.com/albums/r...sports/658.jpg
Old 02-20-2008, 08:12 PM
  #68  
Banned
 
suprastars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mzoomora
It doesnt matter anyway, because that video proves nothing. How do you know that those are the real outputs? From a guy who is nothing more than a troll who will say anything to TRY to prove his point. Ignore his posts and you will be better off. Half the **** he says is made up, the other half if exaggerated.
Yes, what he says is golden. I am a troll.

Last edited by suprastars; 02-20-2008 at 08:17 PM.
Old 02-20-2008, 08:18 PM
  #69  
Banned
 
suprastars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mzoomora
It doesnt matter anyway, because that video proves nothing. How do you know that those are the real outputs? From a guy who is nothing more than a troll who will say anything to TRY to prove his point. Ignore his posts and you will be better off. Half the **** he says is made up, the other half if exaggerated.
Old 02-20-2008, 08:26 PM
  #70  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
The Manalishi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by suprastars
Yes, what he says is golden. I am a troll.
You still stirring the pot? From what I have been told by a couple of guys is that you are pretty smart and a good guy. Why do you act like such an *** on this site? Just curious.
Old 02-20-2008, 08:33 PM
  #71  
Banned
 
suprastars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by The Manalishi
You still stirring the pot? From what I have been told by a couple of guys is that you are pretty smart and a good guy. Why do you act like such an *** on this site? Just curious.
To be honest, just to **** two people off and that mzmoora and dailydriver. Ill conceed though! Ill stop instigating and causing unnecessary arguements!
Old 02-20-2008, 08:41 PM
  #72  
14 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (36)
 
mzoomora's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago, Il
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by suprastars
I made 680rwhp and 710lbft in my 350z with 17psi. On the same dyno, with similar turbokits, this same 350z made:

http://i140.photobucket.com/albums/r...ts/855rwhp.jpg

^ that was 21psi


http://i140.photobucket.com/albums/r...whpoverlay.jpg

^19psi

350z heads flow more than the Ls1. This is why they're able to produce so much power with little boost compared to most cars.


This is on this forum in the FI section:

This is one of our customer cars. It is equipped with the following mods:
-Speed Inc 382"
-03 Z06 Cam
-RGR stage 2 heads
-M6
-Moser 12 bolt
-Speed Inc Fuel system
-ATI D1SC w/8 rib conversion
-Speed Inc/Griffin custom front mount intercooler conversion
-3"-2.5" True duals to the bumper
- 60# Injectors
-Stock PCM

14lbs of boost

http://www.ls1speed.com/pictures/dynorun040.jpg

Compared to a 350z at 14psi same car as above.

http://i140.photobucket.com/albums/r...sports/658.jpg
Now you are comparing supercharged cars to turbo cars? Not exactly apples to apples. Plus that LSx you are using is a pretty mild set up, Z06 cam, etc.
Old 02-20-2008, 08:48 PM
  #73  
Restricted User
iTrader: (24)
 
Blakbird24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Fleetwood, PA
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by suprastars
Cylinders plays little role in determining power! Liters, head flow, VE, compression ratio, dohc, etc.... all determine power, not how many cylinders.

So in theory, I guess a 3.0 liter V8 has more potential than a 4.2 liter 6cylinder

You do understand that a 3.0 liter V10 F1 car(900hp) produces more power n/a than any stroked LS7 or 8.2 liter V10 viper. It is harder to produce power the larger you go in displacement.

Lets see here:

Porsche 415hp 3.8 liters n/a
Ls3 Vette 450hp 6.2 liters
Ls1 5.7 liters 320hp
M3 333hp 3.2 liters
M5 500hp 5.0 liters
350z(07) 312hp
Viper 8.2 liters 600hp

Do you see a trend here. See how lower reving motor/pushrod cant compete with high reving dohc setups. Head flow is the key here. Hence the reason why they offer 4 valve heads for ls1's. And the reason why Dodge was going to offer a Dohc setup on the current viper, but decided against it due to cost.
I'm not about to waste my time arguing with a kid behind a computer screen who thinks that he knows the first thing about engines because he can use google.

However, I will clarify what I meant when I said that more cylinders = more potential. That comment assumes same size cylinders. No **** a 4.0l V6 is going to be capable of more than a 3.0l V8.

Oh and you are wrong when you say that cylinders have little to do with power. They are more important than just about any other aspect of a motor. Most of the aspects you mentioned, such as flow, VE, and compression ratio, are all dependent on the cylinder size and resulting combustion chamber size/shape.

OHV/OHC/DOHC actually has VERY little to do with power output. OHC engines simply have to spin higher to attain the same power that OHV engines do at a given RPM.
Old 02-20-2008, 08:51 PM
  #74  
14 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (36)
 
mzoomora's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago, Il
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

http://www.my350z.com/forum/showthre...33#post3335620

It gets better. So it is a 4.2l stroker, twin turbo shop car with custom prototype cams that you are comparing to a supercharged customer car with a factory stock grind.

Edit- I forgot to add that the 350Z is also on 105 octane.
Old 02-20-2008, 09:17 PM
  #75  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
slick1851's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: CHITOWN
Posts: 3,265
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

But everything is from a mixed parts bin, and really the only thing new is the apperance of the car


So the price shouldnt be 40K for somthing so simple....

This thing better perform well
Old 02-20-2008, 09:18 PM
  #76  
14 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (36)
 
mzoomora's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago, Il
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

18psi on stock truck manifolds.

http://www.atlpf.com/hunter.html

922rwhp.
Old 02-20-2008, 09:19 PM
  #77  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
slick1851's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: CHITOWN
Posts: 3,265
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by NHRAMAN
Musclecars are marketed to mostly well to do people like myself....the 6-bangers will be alot cheaper..even in the 60's..Musclecars were more than priced above your usual gas jockey. mind you..they are more now..even with inflation..but still..


They say there maybe a 5.7 version along with the V6
Old 02-20-2008, 09:33 PM
  #78  
Banned
 
suprastars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mzoomora
18psi on stock truck manifolds.

http://www.atlpf.com/hunter.html

922rwhp.
Which is impressive, but not far off from the 21psi graph I posted. Considering the displacement difference, the torque/hp numbers are on par with eachother.
Old 02-20-2008, 09:34 PM
  #79  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
1CAMWNDR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NHRAMAN
Musclecars are marketed to mostly well to do people like myself....
That is the propblem, right there. The "well to do" set needs to have the Z06, ZR1, CST-V, STS-V, M5, M6, AMG, etc cars marketed to them. Leave the muscle car marketing to us in the rapidly disappearing middle class.
Old 02-20-2008, 09:37 PM
  #80  
14 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (36)
 
mzoomora's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago, Il
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by suprastars
Which is impressive, but not far off from the 21psi graph I posted. Considering the displacement difference, the torque/hp numbers are on par with eachother.
The owner now also has 1089rwhp in his sig. And it also isnt a shop car.


Quick Reply: Why arent the muscle cars priced cheaper?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:03 PM.