2009 cts-v VS camaro 2010
#2
Do you want 556hp/551tq or 426hp/420tq?
Do you want to do 0-60 in 3.9 or 4.6?
Do you want to run 12 flat or low 13s?
Do you want navigation?
I could go on and on. These cars to not directly compete so it is completely up to you. Way too many variables.
Good luck!
#3
Do you want 4 doors or 2?
Do you want 556hp/551tq or 426hp/420tq?
Do you want to do 0-60 in 3.9 or 4.6?
Do you want to run 12 flat or low 13s?
Do you want navigation?
I could go on and on. These cars to not directly compete so it is completely up to you. Way too many variables.
Good luck!
Do you want 556hp/551tq or 426hp/420tq?
Do you want to do 0-60 in 3.9 or 4.6?
Do you want to run 12 flat or low 13s?
Do you want navigation?
I could go on and on. These cars to not directly compete so it is completely up to you. Way too many variables.
Good luck!
#4
Trending Topics
#9
#10
Do you want 4 doors or 2?
Do you want 556hp/551tq or 426hp/420tq?
Do you want to do 0-60 in 3.9 or 4.6?
Do you want to run 12 flat or low 13s?
Do you want navigation?
I could go on and on. These cars to not directly compete so it is completely up to you. Way too many variables.
Good luck!
Do you want 556hp/551tq or 426hp/420tq?
Do you want to do 0-60 in 3.9 or 4.6?
Do you want to run 12 flat or low 13s?
Do you want navigation?
I could go on and on. These cars to not directly compete so it is completely up to you. Way too many variables.
Good luck!
LOL don't think you could have said this any better!!!
#20
Show off! EDIT: I just realized, that picture was taken in my driveway!!!
Gotta say, I'm not really smitten with the new Camaro's looks. Eye-catching, yes ... eye-pleasing, no.
Gotta say, I'm not really smitten with the new Camaro's looks. Eye-catching, yes ... eye-pleasing, no.
Last edited by rand49er; 01-27-2010 at 07:50 AM. Reason: add line