The fix for the CTS-V rear
#122
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Parker TX
The factory rear can handle bolt-ons and mild engine work, but at the same time paying double for something that you will NOT have to replace and most likely never worry about again.
![Winky](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_wink.gif)
#123
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Bergenfield NJ
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Parker TX
The factory rear can handle bolt-ons and mild engine work...
![EEK !!](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_eek2.gif)
PS, he's a maniac on the street
#124
TECH Addict
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas/Denton/Houston
Posts: 2,645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I know how everyone feels. I don't like the fact that I have to resort to a very expensive alternative because cadillac is to incompetent to make the factory diff worthy of the Vs performance. Isn't it irritating when no matter what mods you have on the V or how much power your making, we just can't seem to break out of the 12s in the 1/4mi. I don't see how you could make much of a lesser version of the rear unless you find cheaper half shafts, but that seems to be the only thing you could downgrade. I have heard of Mallett putting a Dana 44 diff in theirs but they cant break the 12s either. I make over 600rwhp for quite a while and never broke, but looking back it seems that racing it from a high 2nd gear and usually high 3rd gear roll wasn't that hard on the diff. Its just that everyone is trying to launch at a very high rpm and usually comes back broken. Thats very hard on the factory rear in the first place, dumping the clutch instead of feathering it. Lets not forget this is a 4100lb pig at the minimum, and to get something that weights that much to launch off a t56 is hard on everything.
The bottem line is that it sucks that a very expensive alternative is the only solution. Very soon when the final product is complete, it will be well worth the cost and wait for something that took alot of R&D to produce by an amazing chassis builder and engineer.
We all know stock diffs =
The bottem line is that it sucks that a very expensive alternative is the only solution. Very soon when the final product is complete, it will be well worth the cost and wait for something that took alot of R&D to produce by an amazing chassis builder and engineer.
We all know stock diffs =
![Limpwrist](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/limpwrist.gif)
#126
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Miami, Fl.
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
no rambles, just truth in your words.
I know it sucks but i would rather have a rear that i can forget about it and move to big, better things.... warhawk anyone?
My only concern, which really isnt a concern but another one of my nit-picks, is the added, if any, noise or vibration one might get, again if any, with this kind of swap. I understand that there is some trade-off's one must endure, and that a little dynomat won't fix.
I really dont mind a small trade of but not a rattle box or like it the springs have been removed.....though i know this wont be the case...i guess im just expressing some of my thoughts.
Anyways, lets see her run!!! 1000rwhp is right around what im looking for!!
buhahahahaha!! Those new ET canted heads, warhawk block sure looks good with this kind of driveline!!
I know it sucks but i would rather have a rear that i can forget about it and move to big, better things.... warhawk anyone?
My only concern, which really isnt a concern but another one of my nit-picks, is the added, if any, noise or vibration one might get, again if any, with this kind of swap. I understand that there is some trade-off's one must endure, and that a little dynomat won't fix.
I really dont mind a small trade of but not a rattle box or like it the springs have been removed.....though i know this wont be the case...i guess im just expressing some of my thoughts.
Anyways, lets see her run!!! 1000rwhp is right around what im looking for!!
buhahahahaha!! Those new ET canted heads, warhawk block sure looks good with this kind of driveline!!
#127
Teching In
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lawrenceville, GA
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I broke my rearend at the Los Angeles County Raceway trying to launch. The dealer gave me the new STS rearend which is supposed to handle over 460hp but I still get wheel hop and am reluctant to race it again. I know that Madman is still working on his project but in the meantime has anyone ever considered putting on traction bars to help reduce the wheelhop issue? Can this even be done?
#130
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Oracle
I broke my rearend at the Los Angeles County Raceway trying to launch. The dealer gave me the new STS rearend which is supposed to handle over 460hp but I still get wheel hop and am reluctant to race it again. I know that Madman is still working on his project but in the meantime has anyone ever considered putting on traction bars to help reduce the wheelhop issue? Can this even be done?
I wasn 't aware that they would bolt up in a CTS...
#131
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Murrieta Ca.
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Oracle
Is there a CTS-V club in So-Cal? I don't know of anyone who owns a V.
Because nobody lives
![The Jester](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_jest.gif)
#132
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Miami, Fl.
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Texan V
Curious about the STS rear end installed in your V...have you got a part number from the service invoice you could share?
I wasn 't aware that they would bolt up in a CTS...
I wasn 't aware that they would bolt up in a CTS...
But this is the part number for the "improved" version: 15793756 Carrier Assembly (complete)-rear differential
#138
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Miami, Fl.
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
any updates?
Let say, for the time being, i have seen a few owners that are over the 500-600rwhp mark. It would seem that the stock rear, though it has its limitations, can hold up to a significant amount of power over stock.
Given, what or how much abuse are ya'll throwing at these rears that are pushing this much power and still maintain the rear for doing a silveradoSS500?!
No powershifting? No track time? etc...
Let say, for the time being, i have seen a few owners that are over the 500-600rwhp mark. It would seem that the stock rear, though it has its limitations, can hold up to a significant amount of power over stock.
Given, what or how much abuse are ya'll throwing at these rears that are pushing this much power and still maintain the rear for doing a silveradoSS500?!
No powershifting? No track time? etc...
#140
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by obZidian
Given, what or how much abuse are ya'll throwing at these rears that are pushing this much power and still maintain the rear for doing a silveradoSS500?!
No powershifting? No track time? etc...
No powershifting? No track time? etc...