any one try a carbed 6.2?
#4
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: MEXICO BORDER
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i congrats all guy that runs low 11. if know i ran 500 pounds havier than mustangs and i ran an a trank non-sticky track, you bave to consider that!
#5
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
118 is really fast, trap speed is a great determiner of hp
I've seen a lot of guys running 105 -110
It is exponentially more difficult to run higher and higher speeds due to aerodynamics/wind resistance etc. I'm sure someone out there knows this stuff better than I do - running 130 takes double the power it takes to run 100 or something like that. Lots of people are excited about their E.T. but the trap speed reveals a lot.
I've seen a lot of guys running 105 -110
It is exponentially more difficult to run higher and higher speeds due to aerodynamics/wind resistance etc. I'm sure someone out there knows this stuff better than I do - running 130 takes double the power it takes to run 100 or something like that. Lots of people are excited about their E.T. but the trap speed reveals a lot.
#6
Speak for yourself. There are a lot of people running faster than 118 MPH right here on the forum with Cam only engines. Every 6.0 I have built except my wagon (only 116 MPH because it weighs 3700 lbs with driver) has run over 118 and my Dakota with a 6.0 run 121.98 N/A at 3400 lbs with driver.
I think the reason for no response is that 6.2's are expensive. They are pretty much double the price of a LY6. Personally, I'd rather save the money and spend it elsewhere.
Trending Topics
#11
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: MEXICO BORDER
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts