Stock flexplate or SFI
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: New Hope, Fl
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Im building a 500 hp 6.0 and was wondering what flexplate to use ( stock or SFI rated). I will be running a th350 in a pro street pickup. Also will I need a crank spacer for the torque converter.
#5
10 Second Club
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
http://sdparts.com/details/tci-automotive/tci399753
Think this is the one I ordered....I was told it had eveything needed and was dual pattern for newer and old school transmissions ?
Think this is the one I ordered....I was told it had eveything needed and was dual pattern for newer and old school transmissions ?
#6
8 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'm a stick shift guy, so I got a thicker flywheel , and a pilot bearing that goes into the outer register of the crank to deal with the difference in crank length on my '07 crank.(.400" shorter than old sbc/bbc, relative to belhousing flange on block)
But with an Auto I beleive you need to put a crank spacer between the crank flange and the flexplate. If you dont the converter will not engage the pump completely. front pump damage is the result.
I think the starter will still work properly with the flex plate spaced away from it, maybe someone who has connected an auto trans to a 2001 and newer engine/crank can chime in.
Barrett
But with an Auto I beleive you need to put a crank spacer between the crank flange and the flexplate. If you dont the converter will not engage the pump completely. front pump damage is the result.
I think the starter will still work properly with the flex plate spaced away from it, maybe someone who has connected an auto trans to a 2001 and newer engine/crank can chime in.
Barrett
#7
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
SFI all day long. For the $ difference and peace of mind alone. Have you ever seen the damage of a flexplate letting loose and shoothing thru a floor pan.... not pretty.
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'm a stick shift guy, so I got a thicker flywheel , and a pilot bearing that goes into the outer register of the crank to deal with the difference in crank length on my '07 crank.(.400" shorter than old sbc/bbc, relative to belhousing flange on block)
But with an Auto I beleive you need to put a crank spacer between the crank flange and the flexplate. If you dont the converter will not engage the pump completely. front pump damage is the result.
I think the starter will still work properly with the flex plate spaced away from it, maybe someone who has connected an auto trans to a 2001 and newer engine/crank can chime in.
Barrett
But with an Auto I beleive you need to put a crank spacer between the crank flange and the flexplate. If you dont the converter will not engage the pump completely. front pump damage is the result.
I think the starter will still work properly with the flex plate spaced away from it, maybe someone who has connected an auto trans to a 2001 and newer engine/crank can chime in.
Barrett
#9
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (30)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The spacer, when needed for TH350/400 specific converters, goes on the converter side of the flexplate, not between the crank flange and flexplate. That is why the starter ring position is unchanged with the addition of the spacer. In this case, the spacer is used to move the crank pilot closer to the back of the converter to meet up with the shorter "snout" on TH350/400 to SB/BBC converters.
The factory vehicles (4L80E combo's I think) that had the same type of spacer between crank flange and flexplate had flat flexplates instead of slightly bell-shaped ones like 4L60E (and other) combo's had. So the spacer put the starter ring of the flat flex plate where it would have been on a bell-shaped flexplate without a spacer behind it.
So bottom line........if you have a bell-shaped flex plate from a 4L60E combo, you'd run the spacer on the outside (converter side) of the flexplate). I THINK you can also run a flat 4L80E flexplate with the spacer behind it and achieve the same results with a TH350/400 but I've never tried it. OR.....if you need a new converter anyway, have one built with the LS-specific snout on the back of it and use no spacers with a regular bell-shaped flexplate. For what it's worth.....the popular SFI plates are of the bell-shaped variety. The last scenario is what my combo is (TCI flexplate and LS specific TH400 converter from PTC).
The factory vehicles (4L80E combo's I think) that had the same type of spacer between crank flange and flexplate had flat flexplates instead of slightly bell-shaped ones like 4L60E (and other) combo's had. So the spacer put the starter ring of the flat flex plate where it would have been on a bell-shaped flexplate without a spacer behind it.
So bottom line........if you have a bell-shaped flex plate from a 4L60E combo, you'd run the spacer on the outside (converter side) of the flexplate). I THINK you can also run a flat 4L80E flexplate with the spacer behind it and achieve the same results with a TH350/400 but I've never tried it. OR.....if you need a new converter anyway, have one built with the LS-specific snout on the back of it and use no spacers with a regular bell-shaped flexplate. For what it's worth.....the popular SFI plates are of the bell-shaped variety. The last scenario is what my combo is (TCI flexplate and LS specific TH400 converter from PTC).
#14
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Martin Mi
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Im using the hughes hp4004x. IIRC it retails for around 145 dollars. Im running the spacer between the flexplate and transmission. I.E. Crank, flexplate, spacer. That way it properly spaces the dished hughes flexplate and supports the snout of the converter. Eric L
#15
10 Second Club
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
yep....thats the one I got....
Part Number: 399753
Brand: TCI Automotive
The new TCI LS1 Flexplate is made from billet steel plate and is
SFI 29.1 approved. The Lightweight design provides quick engine
response. Dual bolt patterns allow for stock LS1 and small GM bolt
pattern torque converters.
Fits ’98 and newer F-bodies with LS1 engine as well as ’99 and
newer GM trucks with 4.8L, 5.3L and 6.0L LS based engines
Includes Mounting hardware
Part Number: 399753
Brand: TCI Automotive
The new TCI LS1 Flexplate is made from billet steel plate and is
SFI 29.1 approved. The Lightweight design provides quick engine
response. Dual bolt patterns allow for stock LS1 and small GM bolt
pattern torque converters.
Fits ’98 and newer F-bodies with LS1 engine as well as ’99 and
newer GM trucks with 4.8L, 5.3L and 6.0L LS based engines
Includes Mounting hardware
#16
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The spacer, when needed for TH350/400 specific converters, goes on the converter side of the flexplate, not between the crank flange and flexplate. That is why the starter ring position is unchanged with the addition of the spacer. In this case, the spacer is used to move the crank pilot closer to the back of the converter to meet up with the shorter "snout" on TH350/400 to SB/BBC converters.
The factory vehicles (4L80E combo's I think) that had the same type of spacer between crank flange and flexplate had flat flexplates instead of slightly bell-shaped ones like 4L60E (and other) combo's had. So the spacer put the starter ring of the flat flex plate where it would have been on a bell-shaped flexplate without a spacer behind it.
So bottom line........if you have a bell-shaped flex plate from a 4L60E combo, you'd run the spacer on the outside (converter side) of the flexplate). I THINK you can also run a flat 4L80E flexplate with the spacer behind it and achieve the same results with a TH350/400 but I've never tried it. OR.....if you need a new converter anyway, have one built with the LS-specific snout on the back of it and use no spacers with a regular bell-shaped flexplate. For what it's worth.....the popular SFI plates are of the bell-shaped variety. The last scenario is what my combo is (TCI flexplate and LS specific TH400 converter from PTC).
The factory vehicles (4L80E combo's I think) that had the same type of spacer between crank flange and flexplate had flat flexplates instead of slightly bell-shaped ones like 4L60E (and other) combo's had. So the spacer put the starter ring of the flat flex plate where it would have been on a bell-shaped flexplate without a spacer behind it.
So bottom line........if you have a bell-shaped flex plate from a 4L60E combo, you'd run the spacer on the outside (converter side) of the flexplate). I THINK you can also run a flat 4L80E flexplate with the spacer behind it and achieve the same results with a TH350/400 but I've never tried it. OR.....if you need a new converter anyway, have one built with the LS-specific snout on the back of it and use no spacers with a regular bell-shaped flexplate. For what it's worth.....the popular SFI plates are of the bell-shaped variety. The last scenario is what my combo is (TCI flexplate and LS specific TH400 converter from PTC).
#17
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Martin Mi
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have a question. Why is it everyone is running the TCI flexplate for $250, when Hughes makes one for about $150? Am I missing something. They are both SFI approved. The hughes part number is HP4004x. It is a dished one that you use with a spacer. Eric L
#20
10 Second Club
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Wasn't offered and I didn't look well enough
damnit
![](http://static.summitracing.com/global/images/prod/large/tci-399753_w.jpg)
Now after looking..... I like the TCI better anyway.
![Sad](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_sad.gif)
![](http://static.summitracing.com/global/images/prod/large/tci-399753_w.jpg)
Now after looking..... I like the TCI better anyway.
![](http://www.jegs.com/images/photos/500/512/512-HP4004X_3.jpg)
Last edited by Doug G; 07-01-2012 at 02:01 PM.