Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Ls1 dodge ram!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-21-2010, 12:22 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
silverz28camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: st.louis
Posts: 1,944
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Ls1 dodge ram!!!

I had a 440 in the truck for the past few years and it was cool in all, but it only went 15.7 @ 84 in a 4600lb truck. I know the stock cam was the problem, but its not that simple to just swap the cam in the 440. The problem was it was a stock motor from 1978 and had 7.8 compression, cast pistons, and not to mention the 9mpgs I was getting in the 3 speed 727, 3.90 gears also was killing me.

Since my all motor camaro runs 10.69 with just an ls2 swap heads and cam all motor I figured the same type of motor would work good in the dodge as well. Most of the chevy 5.3 trucks run better then what my 440 has. Also wit hthe ls1 vs the 440 in weight I should come out several hundred lbs lighter.

Truck is getting a ls1 700r4 and np 208 whitch is also alot lighter then the np203 I had

Last edited by silverz28camaro; 07-07-2011 at 09:58 PM.
Old 04-21-2010, 12:22 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
silverz28camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: st.louis
Posts: 1,944
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default




Old 04-21-2010, 12:23 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
silverz28camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: st.louis
Posts: 1,944
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Both engines are sitting on the ground on oil pans...look at the size difference


Old 04-21-2010, 12:23 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
silverz28camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: st.louis
Posts: 1,944
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

more pics

For now I just lowered the ls1 into the bay, with the stock crossmember the ls1 will be far to much forward and to high for what I want it to be. I'm going to cut the crossmember out, and set the motor as far back and down as I can.





Old 04-21-2010, 12:24 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
silverz28camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: st.louis
Posts: 1,944
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'm wondering what headers to go with, maybe ones for any chevy truck will work?
Old 04-21-2010, 12:30 PM
  #6  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (28)
 
gnx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 3,453
Received 150 Likes on 97 Posts

Default

I don't think you will have any clearance issues in there. That engine bay could swallow 2 LS1s
Old 04-21-2010, 12:38 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
silverz28camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: st.louis
Posts: 1,944
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Yeah thats what I was thinking.

I want it to me mild, nothing like my camaro. Mainly bolt-ons, headers, already has 3.90's, ls6 manifold, ported tb and maf, dyno tune.

I'm sure the truck will see 18mpgs on the highway. I'm not going to say it should run 13's but if it does run a 13.9 I wouldn't be surprised.

My girlfriends dads new hemi dodge ram runs a 15.3 and it is a 5,000 lbs truck. He has intake, no headers, hypertech tune,, shortbed standard cab. With mine being about 4200 after the swap and bolt-ons I think it will be atleast low 14's
Old 04-21-2010, 03:38 PM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
Jim85IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Readsboro, VT
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Looks like a great swap, though to be honest, a few well-chosen upgrades to the 440 probably would have yielded superior results. It doesn't seem to take a lot to get a lot out of a good 440.
Old 04-21-2010, 11:11 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
silverz28camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: st.louis
Posts: 1,944
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Yeah , but my camaro is the thing that needs to be fast, the truck needs better mpgs. If I did anything to the 440 mileage would get even worse. I like the truck and I want to be able to drive it more.

Even if I did a 2800 stall wit hthe ls1 mileage will be at least 5mpgs more still and it would seem to have more low end.
Old 05-03-2010, 01:16 AM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
silverz28camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: st.louis
Posts: 1,944
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default


Old 05-03-2010, 01:17 AM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
silverz28camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: st.louis
Posts: 1,944
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default




Old 05-03-2010, 02:34 AM
  #12  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
kevin99hoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 482
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

thats something you dont see every day, im sure the mopar guys will hate it so much
Old 05-03-2010, 09:13 AM
  #13  
Staging Lane
 
SS-TEN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm starting to believe that every vehicle on the planet should have an LS based motor. lol. Great progress SilverZ! Subscribing :-)
Old 05-03-2010, 10:51 AM
  #14  
On The Tree
iTrader: (5)
 
bmxmon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Moorhead Minnesota
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Have you thought about using the truck intake for some more torque? There are a million of them for dirt cheap in the parts section and I'm sure you'd have the room. Doesn't look nearly as good though.
Old 05-03-2010, 12:23 PM
  #15  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
silverz28camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: st.louis
Posts: 1,944
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by bmxmon
Have you thought about using the truck intake for some more torque? There are a million of them for dirt cheap in the parts section and I'm sure you'd have the room. Doesn't look nearly as good though.
Yeah, I really don't like the truck manifold, a few dyno testing showed the ls6 manifold to be near identical hp and tq numbers as the truck one. I think 2-3 hp diff if that.

I tried some f-body headers and they hit the frame, so I need to look into some block huggers. I was able to get a stock 99 camaro exhaust manifold to fit with about 1/2 clearance of the frame rail, but I do not want to run manifolds.
Old 05-03-2010, 12:28 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
silverz28camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: st.louis
Posts: 1,944
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by kevin99hoss
thats something you dont see every day, im sure the mopar guys will hate it so much
I haven't yet but I think I'm going to post this on moparforums.com...LOL
Old 05-03-2010, 12:28 PM
  #17  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
pj4553's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Covington, LA
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Cool build man. I love to see projects like this.
Old 05-03-2010, 12:34 PM
  #18  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
 
deelong4002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Stockbridge, MI
Posts: 724
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Could you do a T-56 with 4x4? That would get you some bad *** mileage
Old 05-03-2010, 01:12 PM
  #19  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
silverz28camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: st.louis
Posts: 1,944
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by deelong4002
Could you do a T-56 with 4x4? That would get you some bad *** mileage
Yeah I thought about it, I would need a np205 divorced t-case from a mid 70's ford truck.

I think it would just be more time consuming to rig that setup up vs. the auto.
Old 05-03-2010, 04:00 PM
  #20  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
menchaca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: dallas,ga
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

cool swap man.that is a goodlooking truck.


Quick Reply: Ls1 dodge ram!!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:43 AM.