71 Ford F100 Short Bed
http://www.herronperformance.com/sto...&productId=239
http://www.kartek.com/Product/Shifters/Winters.html
I measured the rear frame rails for a modern fuel tank and they are a bit narrower than newer trucks (29" vs 32"). I may still try and squeeze a 90s Ford Bronco tank in there. 33 gallons of capacity would be nice. If not I'll build a tank that fits the dimensions of the rear frame or have a tank builder in Havasu do it.
My goal is to get it running and then start fixing/cleaning/modifying things. I'll probably do a bit to the motor once it runs and bugs are worked out.

These will be converted into bead locks. The offset will allow me to keep the truck low on the big tires. They are factory on 02+ Dodge Ram 1500s. 17" Diameter, 5x5.5, and I got the set for $60.
Not entirely sure what I want for gearing. 3.50 might feel ok, 3.73 or 4.11 might be better. No OD or lockup and I don't want it screaming at 80mph.

Picked up some crappy old shocks off of CL for the front. 14x2.5s with a 350/450 rate. I've got to rebuild and clean them.
I kind of want this truck to be pretty so don't be surprised if it ends up with new Bilstein shocks before it's done.
Last edited by philofab; Mar 7, 2012 at 07:55 PM.
Trending Topics

Got some parts from Ruff Stuff Specialties today.
LS motor mounts and two shock mount buckets.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Looks like the truck will have a Turbo 400 with a RV style converter (at most 300rpm over stock), 3.50 gears, 35" tires. So a cam that starts making power at 2K is probably a bad idea.
I also think I will build one piece side windows for this. I've never been a fan of vent windows and I've built 1pc stuff for 67-72 Chevy's before. I also installed a no-limit kit into a 49 Chevy pickup but it was just as much work as building my own. Has anyone done this on a 67-72 before? I'd like to keep the manual cranks but I'll go power if I have to.




Looks like the truck will have a Turbo 400 with a RV style converter (at most 300rpm over stock), 3.50 gears, 35" tires. So a cam that starts making power at 2K is probably a bad idea.
While the ls6 cam can be picked up used for cheaper than an aftermarket, as long as you stick with a small cam it would be worth it as the power gains would be much better than the ls6 with the same drivability.
The truck accessories seem to be an issue too.
I might be better off paying a little more and just buying a 6.0 to start with money/power wise.
I saw you mentioned going the 6.0 route. I believe you would be happier with this set up anyway. The lq4 can be had for cheap and will produce some great power. There are plenty examples here in the hybrid section of lq builds.
http://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/at...0&d=1330297495
Here is thread with smooth ones.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/conversio...k-intakes.html





