New Hooker 1968-72 A-Body LS Swap System Preview
#501
Todd I am running the 4L80E and the stock 12bolt. The suspension is all stock right now. The car seems to sit lower due to old springs I think. I would like a lower look. Not sure if I want to go 1" or 2". But I know I want that lower look. I have a welder and I have done tons of fabrication. My plans would be to take the stock cross member and turn it into a 2 piece design like the holley member. But if the holley cross member allows for more wiggle room then I will purchase it. Thanks
#502
The lower you go with your rear suspension with that 12-bolt, the larger your U-joint operating angles will be. You can run a 1" drop and easily end up with excellent U-joint angles. A 2" drop would be at the limit for not having to cut the tunnel open to adjust angles and anything more than that I wouldn't recommend unless you were running a Ford 9" rear.
Thanks
#503
2.5 degrees is the number achieved during my development efforts, but that doesn't mean a hill of beans to your car unless you measured the same reference point on your frame that I did on my development car with your car at the same ride height and there was no damage to your frame. That reference measurement is only important as to how it relates to the U-joint working angles associated with it, which in the case or your car using the Hooker engine brackets and crossmember would be less than 3 degrees.
#504
Todd sorry for all the armature questions. I am really new to this driveline stuff. Engine and transmission work are my cup of tea. Does the transmission point up 2.5 degrees or down? How much tunnel clearance do you have with the hooker crossmember? Do you have enough to push the transmission up more if needed with shims?
Thanks
Thanks
#505
Todd sorry for all the armature questions. I am really new to this driveline stuff. Engine and transmission work are my cup of tea. Does the transmission point up 2.5 degrees or down? How much tunnel clearance do you have with the hooker crossmember? Do you have enough to push the transmission up more if needed with shims?
Thanks
Thanks
#507
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,244
Likes: 1,531
From: The City of Fountains
If cutting the floor is not desirable and you still want to lower the car more, you can get a CV driveshaft, which is what I have in both the 70 GTO and my Cougar.
http://www.driveshaftshop.com/domest...-or-muscle-car
In the Cougar I also run a CV at the pinion gear, while on the GTO the rear uses a u-joint. If I was to do the GTO over again, I'd do double CV joints. Frank at The Driveshaft Shop will probably tell you that it's not necessary, but the Cougar is super smooth even when the driveshaft is spinning at 5000 rpm...
Andrew
http://www.driveshaftshop.com/domest...-or-muscle-car
In the Cougar I also run a CV at the pinion gear, while on the GTO the rear uses a u-joint. If I was to do the GTO over again, I'd do double CV joints. Frank at The Driveshaft Shop will probably tell you that it's not necessary, but the Cougar is super smooth even when the driveshaft is spinning at 5000 rpm...
Andrew
#508
If cutting the floor is not desirable and you still want to lower the car more, you can get a CV driveshaft, which is what I have in both the 70 GTO and my Cougar.
http://www.driveshaftshop.com/domest...-or-muscle-car
In the Cougar I also run a CV at the pinion gear, while on the GTO the rear uses a u-joint. If I was to do the GTO over again, I'd do double CV joints. Frank at The Driveshaft Shop will probably tell you that it's not necessary, but the Cougar is super smooth even when the driveshaft is spinning at 5000 rpm...
Andrew
http://www.driveshaftshop.com/domest...-or-muscle-car
In the Cougar I also run a CV at the pinion gear, while on the GTO the rear uses a u-joint. If I was to do the GTO over again, I'd do double CV joints. Frank at The Driveshaft Shop will probably tell you that it's not necessary, but the Cougar is super smooth even when the driveshaft is spinning at 5000 rpm...
Andrew
#509
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,244
Likes: 1,531
From: The City of Fountains
Andrew
#510
#511
A suitable 1970 El Camino was found to replace the first one we brought in for development of an El Camino/convertible transmission crossmember and found its frame to be severely bent out of shape. I've finished the preliminary in-car mock-up work and so will be moving this project into the CAD phase next week...here's a couple of images for those interested in what a complete Hooker/Holley/Quicktime set-up looks like installed under an El Camino; a convertible installation would look the same
#513
No Andrew, we're using the forward bias engine brackets and the trans is a T56 Magnum, which has a more forward shifter housing location than the 4th-gen F-body T56...the only tunnel cutting/rebuilding that is required with this configuration is immediately adjacent to the shifter housing. By comparison, the entire tunnel would have to be cut-out and rebuilt If this same selection of components was attempted to be installed using the Hooker rear bias engine brackets...it's a night and day difference.
#514
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,244
Likes: 1,531
From: The City of Fountains
No Andrew, we're using the forward bias engine brackets and the trans is a T56 Magnum, which has a more forward shifter housing location than the 4th-gen F-body T56...the only tunnel cutting/rebuilding that is required with this configuration is immediately adjacent to the shifter housing. By comparison, the entire tunnel would have to be cut-out and rebuilt If this same selection of components was attempted to be installed using the Hooker rear bias engine brackets...it's a night and day difference.
Andrew
#515
#516
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,244
Likes: 1,531
From: The City of Fountains
#519
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,244
Likes: 1,531
From: The City of Fountains