LS1/T56 In a first gen.
. hope i have helped Last edited by 79ls1; Dec 7, 2004 at 11:42 PM.
It all looks so easy on paper but there are always little issues.. radiator hoses and such but mostly headers are the sticking point..
There is also the oil pan notching issue.. lots of pics on my site if that helps
It all looks so easy on paper but there are always little issues.. radiator hoses and such but mostly headers are the sticking point..
There is also the oil pan notching issue.. lots of pics on my site if that helps

Trending Topics
Thanks Scott
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Thanks Scott[/QUO
I tried using BRP's entire kit and I'm here to tell you I had to make a new trans crossmember. The one they made looked relatively cheap and it did not fit. The bolt holes did not line up with the subframe (and yes I measured the frame diagonally-twice) and the mount for the transmission was off to the left by more than 3/4". I was a little dissappointed. Why wouldn't you want to have the motor to as close to the center of the car as possible. I guess you have to ask yourself what's important. Do you want the LS1 for looks or do you want the car to perform? Also, better the check the clearance from the A/C compressor to the frame with the BRP mounts. I could hardly fit a sheet of paper between the two. Now I have to say BRP'S mounts fit better than S & P's, and you do save money with their stuff.
but back toyour topic... mounting the motor was the hardest thing to do on this project! i never knew how aggrivated i could get with something! i used the s&p kit with the notched oil pan, but i must say that i was dissapointed with the oil pna, it leaks!
Thanks Scott
1. It looked better
2. Better weight transfer
3. so the S&P headers would clear the gear box
4. because I could

I could see how using the whole BRP systems would be a $$$ saver if you were running AC and such..
???Geeze!!! Alot to ask on your first post, but it has all been covered. Start with the sticky section then try the search function. And this should have been asked on a new thread

Oh, and welcome to LS1 tech!
ChrisP
Well, that’s kind of not true...
The stainless works headers, for the 1st gen Camaro, were first developed for the Year One Camaro ( the white and orange vert) and that car used BRP products. Hence, the SW headers were built around the BRP engine mounts using the BRP rack kit.
And now SW offers a 1st gen header for the guys/girls that like to use a steering box.
My 1st gen is living proof that SW headers will work with the S&P type mounts.
I am using the BRP rack kit
I didn't like the "look" of the motor moved forward with the BRP mounts. This equates to 4 inches from the firewall to the head on the passenger side and even more space on the drivers side since the heads are staggered.
It was designed that way so one could use the factory accessories with no fab for brackets, a/c etc. and to allow room for the 4th gen rack setup. (If the motor was moved aft, there would be a conflict with the low mount alternator and the top of the rack)
Here’s what I did…
I didn't like the idea of notching the oil pan, so I didn't, and thats just my choice.
I cut my own S&P style mounts from the template in the FAQ sticky section.
The motor sits about 1.75” from the firewall to the head.
I am using corvette accessories in order to clear the BRP rack kit.
I am using SW headers with no issues just like the guy (can’t remember his name) at SW told me they would no matter which mounts I used since I am using a rack.
But, if you are using a box instead of a rack I could see where that statement might be true. I believe Steve (Steve1969LS1) went through that on a not so distant past post.
BTW, happy 42nd Steve!!!
ChrisP



