Supradupra!
10-14-2005 | 11:53 AM
#105
Originally Posted by 01SSDRVR
not really. hes comparing turbochargers not motors.
10-14-2005 | 01:19 PM
#106
Teching In
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
go for it I think it's a good idea. Although I would go with at least a 382 if you're going through the headache of doing an engine swap anyways. When I put the ls1 in my rx-7, I should've put a built bigger motor in it.
Another thing is pushing 1000hp from 3 liters is not the same as 1000hp from a 5.3. I bet the turbo torque doesn't come in til about 4500rpm, and when it does it probably hits too hard. The flatter more linear power bands of turbo v8s are more fun I think. Turbo response is most likely better with a v8, obviously.
Another thing is pushing 1000hp from 3 liters is not the same as 1000hp from a 5.3. I bet the turbo torque doesn't come in til about 4500rpm, and when it does it probably hits too hard. The flatter more linear power bands of turbo v8s are more fun I think. Turbo response is most likely better with a v8, obviously.
10-14-2005 | 02:13 PM
#107
TECH Junkie
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,265
Likes: 1
From: CHITOWN
Like ive said ,this whole thread was made to see how much of a pissing match it would start. I want to see a pic of this motor and your supra that you are going to swap, Then you can take people advice. I honesly think its all hot ait being blown. I have yet to see the motor and the car.
10-14-2005 | 02:47 PM
#108
Teching In
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Springfield, Mo
Originally Posted by redfulcrum
Another thing is pushing 1000hp from 3 liters is not the same as 1000hp from a 5.3. I bet the turbo torque doesn't come in til about 4500rpm, and when it does it probably hits too hard. The flatter more linear power bands of turbo v8s are more fun I think. Turbo response is most likely better with a v8, obviously.
It all depends on the turbo. A greddy 88 is like an on/off switch, while some other turbos of the same size or bigger are MUCH smoother. Smaller turbo's in the < 71mm size produce a very nice power band/curve.
Bottom line is, for a 2j, 1000 rwhp will not be made on a turbo that hits full boost below 5k rpm with n2o.
10-18-2005 | 01:15 PM
#109
11 Second Club
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: hesperia,ca
Originally Posted by slick1851
Like ive said ,this whole thread was made to see how much of a pissing match it would start. I want to see a pic of this motor and your supra that you are going to swap, Then you can take people advice. I honesly think its all hot ait being blown. I have yet to see the motor and the car.
10-22-2005 | 06:59 PM
#114
Teching In
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Austin tx and Daytona FL.
I should add... 1982 Z-28 BBC 467" , immaculate condition , 175-180mph in overdrive
1978 V-12 Jaguar conv. 435whp, show car
1987 MAZDA RX-7 , 490whp much turbo runs 10.80s 126mph
they all are street cars, no over heating , good driveability.
1978 V-12 Jaguar conv. 435whp, show car
1987 MAZDA RX-7 , 490whp much turbo runs 10.80s 126mph
they all are street cars, no over heating , good driveability.
