LQ4 into a 3rd Gen/1972 Nova
For temp I have 2 X coolant sensors (both electric, one for Holley and one for dash gauge), a pre-intercooler IAT sensor (at compressor outlet of passenger side turbo) and a pre-throttlebody IAT sensor right at the intercooler top outlet.
Passenger side - hot side, pre-turbo:
- Exhaust gas temp thermocouple (half way between exhaust manifold & turbo)
- Exhaust gas pressure sensor (half way between exhaust manifold & turbo)
Passenger side - cold side:
- Charge air temperature sensor, pre-intercooler (at compressor outlet of passenger side turbo)
- Charge air pressure sensor, pre-intercooler (at compressor outlet of passenger side turbo)
Passenger side - hot side, post-turbo:
- WB02 sensor (~20" down from turbo on passenger downpipe)
- Plugged bung for future Exhaust Gas Temp sensor in downpipe (~18" down from turbo)
- Plugged bung for future Exhaust Gas Pressure sensor in downpipe (~18" down from turbo, to measure downpipe backpressure)
Other sensors:
- Charge air temperature sensor, post-intercooler (right before throttlebody, used for Holley IAT)
- Manifold absolute pressure sensor (front of intake manifold, used for Holley MAP)
- Dome pressure sensor (single sensor tee'd into both wastegate domes)
- Rad fan shroud pressure sensor (to measure under-shroud pressure vs speed with fans on & off, to see if I need to add rubber flaps to vent shroud pressure)
Last edited by frojoe; Jul 15, 2019 at 12:38 AM.
At the end of August I did manage to take it to a friend's shop and put the car on a lift for the first time ever... just to give it a post-summer inspection and see my exhaust work from further than 16" from my face haha....
The exhaust looks killer. Ground clearance is perfect. You can tell its well thought out. What is the reasoning for the double flex connecters and what brand? Do you recall the P/N's for the DynoMax mufflers? One last thing, Is that a trans fluid pump next to the trans? Is that normal if so?
Thanks,
Jim
Thanks! Doubling up on flex connectors was an attempt to allow the dual pipes to shift parallel to the engine, and allow even more vibration isolation from the engine. My thinking was that if I used a single flex connector per bank, that would want to bend much more easily than shift/sway laterally... so by adding two flex couplers I can have the section between them bend/sway/flex as needed but the dual pipes behind them will stay inline with the car.
The part numbers I used are:
3.0" flex coupler (Ace Race Parts): 24019
3.5" flex coupler (Ace Race Parts): 24021
Muffler (Dynomax): WLK-17517
The trans pump is just a fluid pump to move ATF from the back of the case to the front of the case under sustained acceleration... there also really was nowhere else to put it haha.
Cheers,
Joe
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
In other news, my gf and I bought a house! I have a 20x20 garage all to my own to build out and do future work on the Nova. Rest assured, once it's a decently organized and functioning work area, I have a few things planned to do to the Nova (hood vents, engine oil cooler, new rear axle, etc)...
For anyone who is interested, I just started a garage build thread on Garage Journal. Much the same style as this build thread.. but will be garage/shop/yard/organizational stuffs.
Link is here:
Joe's garage -- "Dollar Special" -- GarageJournal
And thanks for the power steering right up as well. Also worked for a hydraulics company that is located on our complex so that can be done on the cheap as well.
1) first and foremost is cooling, for a couple reasons:
- current turbo hotside pipes wrap around in front of the waterpump and have limited my radiator thickness.. I physically can't put in a thicker rad and fan stack without removing the grill and pushing the intercooler forwad above the bumper, or removing the hotside crossover piping
- to reduce underhood pressure as much as possible and make the radiator the most efficient, I need inner fenders.. with my low ride height I simply cannot fit an inner fender in the passenger side with the 275 tire at full left steering lock
2) power/response:
- I'm at the physical limit of turbo that I can fit under the hood in the current location.. remember I don't have subframe bushings to my hood is now that 3/4" lower to the engine.. the max turbo size would be a Precision 78/75 but that's only a small step up from current
- for the single setup I tried to keep the hot piping similar lengths side to side, but there is still ~3ft of passenger side piping and probably 4+ft of driver side piping, at 2.5" OD pipe it's oversized and slowing exhaust velocity down, and likely what is introducing lag from what I've read
- I want to go from a horizontal flow intercooler to a vertical flow to spread the airflow path wider and shorter for less pressure drop..
- I need to remake the exhaust anyways, so I might as well start that project as dual 3.5" pipes from two turbine housings instead of a single 4" pipe from one turbo and possibly redo later
The upsides I can see from going single to twins:
- frees up several inches of room between the rad and the waterpump, allowing a thicker but also taller rad core that fits an upsized dual fan setup, to help pull air thru the thicker core
- significantly shorter turbo hotside (from ~4ft @ 2.375" ID per side to hopefully <1ft @ 2.25" ID)
- better airflow overall (for if I decide to go bigger cubes now or later on) by having dual 2.5" compressor outlets to single 3.5" feeding the throttlebody
- turbos moved forward allows more room for inner fenders, which are essential for lowering the underhood pressure and making the pressure drop across the rad larger
- I've always liked the idea of twins, even since before Mark started his project (I'll naturally be a tad larger than his 6265 Precisions, just because)
- Lastly.. why not? If I've done a single turbo setup to pretty good success (self admittedly, for a first ever attempt that I fabricated in my early 20's) there's only one direction to naturally progress to!
- current turbo hotside pipes wrap around in front of the waterpump and have limited my radiator thickness.. I physically can't put in a thicker rad and fan stack without removing the grill and pushing the intercooler forward above the bumper, or removing the hotside crossover piping
-> I've had great success with the new cross-flow radiator, high density fins, two big fans (16"+13") and moving the turbo hot pipes the hell away from the shroud. I can get repeatedly boosty in 25*C weather (~80*F) with no heat soak or creep, and maintain 185-190*F coolant temp with the fans cycling on/off. I will still temp creep up to 200*F when stuck in hot stop-and-go traffic... but it doesn't slowly creep to 205, 210, 215*F like it used to with the single turbo piping setup.
- to reduce underhood pressure as much as possible and make the radiator the most efficient, I need inner fenders.. with my low ride height I simply cannot fit an inner fender in the passenger side with the 275 tire at full left steering lock
-> still haven't made inner fenders for it... those are next up I think once I move all my fabrications tools to the new house I just bought.
2) power/response:
- I'm at the physical limit of turbo that I can fit under the hood in the current location.. remember I don't have subframe bushings to my hood is now that 3/4" lower to the engine.. the max turbo size would be a Precision 78/75 but that's only a small step up from current
-> I'm happy that I gained about 2" of turbo housing clearance to the tires at full lock, which then gained some room for inner fenders (yet to be fabbed)
- for the single setup I tried to keep the hot piping similar lengths side to side, but there is still ~3ft of passenger side piping and probably 4+ft of driver side piping, at 2.5" OD pipe it's oversized and slowing exhaust velocity down, and likely what is introducing lag from what I've read
-> I nerded the **** out of making the hot side piping diameter/x-section and lengths identical left to right... and I feel like it's helped with FAST response on my arguably-bigger-than-necessary 64mm turbos...
- I want to go from a horizontal flow intercooler to a vertical flow to spread the airflow path wider and shorter for less pressure drop..
-> This was a big win for me. Going from a small horizontal-flow eBay 3" intercooler, to a quality Garrett 3.5" core with turbulators.. I get temperature rise of only a few degrees, and if I'm just cruising at speed in moderate temperature, I see a temp DROP across the intercooler of 2-3 degrees (to the best of my recollection, and with identical temp senders on either side of intercooler)
- I need to remake the exhaust anyways, so I might as well start that project as dual 3.5" pipes from two turbine housings instead of a single 4" pipe from one turbo and possibly redo later
-> It's loud, the exhaust looks good, I still love the 4" tips notched into the rear bumper. I haven't thrown a pressure sensor on the downpipe to measure exhaust backpressure.. but I can't imagine it's significant, if it even exists.
The upsides I can see from going single to twins:
- frees up several inches of room between the rad and the waterpump, allowing a thicker but also taller rad core that fits an upsized dual fan setup, to help pull air thru the thicker core
-> real happy with the improved accessory drive clearances, like mentioned above for rad/shroud/fan. I now also have hand room to replace the belt with just a 15mm wrench, which is a big improvement compared to before.
- significantly shorter turbo hotside (from ~4ft @ 2.375" ID per side to hopefully <1ft @ 2.25" ID)
- better airflow overall (for if I decide to go bigger cubes now or later on) by having dual 2.5" compressor outlets to single 3.5" feeding the throttlebody
- turbos moved forward allows more room for inner fenders, which are essential for lowering the underhood pressure and making the pressure drop across the rad larger
-> for this, still want to add hood vents to blow off any residual underhood pressure (with or without inner fenders), but also vent out underhood heat
- I've always liked the idea of twins, even since before Mark started his project (I'll naturally be a tad larger than his 6265 Precisions, just because)
- Lastly.. why not? If I've done a single turbo setup to pretty good success (self admittedly, for a first ever attempt that I fabricated in my early 20's) there's only one direction to naturally progress to!
-> this is still pretty accurate. Also popping the hood and having people just go "holy F*&%" is satisfying, followed with saying I did it all myself
I can see the desire to build another car after getting this to a point of zenith, but you made a statement about bringing "the joy back to driving". Does that imply something has been lost in all this? Or is it just time to have something different to renew your interest?
After having my car for so long, I've had my ups and downs, periods of lost interest, and periods where I was really rev'd up about new projects or experiences. Getting into autocross, even just a little, brought me back to the car in a very different way. Also my children and their love of cruising with dad gave me yet another experience. I'm looking forward to road trips after I get the six speed into my car. I'd be happy to just spend a few weeks on the road exploring. I still have plenty of upgrade meat on the bone, so I'm just in a different place.
Your Nova is one of the finest examples out there. Thanks for continuing to take us along in your journey.
Going through the same thing with a friends Nova I tune.. Not as clean as yours....(Sorry for the hijack Joe)
I know that's a strange sentence for you to be hearing Clint as you drive yours all the time, but Mark gets it... it's something that you just can't quite allow yourself to get used to, with that much power always on tap and having to constantly reign it in.
What I am desiring as a sort of yin-yang to the Nova... a car that is smaller, lighter, manual, N/A.... "sporty". Low but not too low, firm but not harshly stiff... something I can mash the pedal and let 350hp rev up reasonably quickly without worrying about always "being on it" and having the rear kick out in X gear. More of a "driver's car".. that's really all I'm getting at. The BMW is an amazing piece of automobile refinement meant for comfortably cruising, that I just can't bring myself to alter. And the 24V Dodge is more and more turning into an ever-muddy tree smashing faux-rockcrawler camping rig haha.
What is the ideal HP level on ANY street car? I'm not sure. 500hp seems to be the number most people will throw out for "usable power on the street"... maybe that means in terms of predictable traction, or passing power, or red-light clutch drops, or just generally happy acceleration without "running out of road" too quickly.
For this "other car" I mentioned above.. for me... personal opinion........ I think 325-400hp is the happy range. Smaller displacement and higher-rev'ing to attain it would be just fine with me. Keeping it light, nimble-ish, and not having the revs just climb away from you every time you mash it.. to me that sounds like a different, new kind of "street car fun".
Last edited by frojoe; Jul 23, 2020 at 09:56 PM.
Very interesting post. I don't blame you for wanting to build something else. I go through sort of the same process with my GTO. I have owned that car for 34 years and it is what it is. I keep having ideas about how great it would be if I did this or that, but the reality is that it is what it is...
I actually think you would really enjoy something like my Cougar. With your mad skills I would enjoy seeing you take on a more unique project than a Mustang...There are many great platforms to choose from.
Andrew
Cheers and thank you again for showing us what's possible. I'm still waiting for that burnout or donut video.
Let's face it, except for the few that track these cars, these high HP builds are mostly bragging rights. I used to track my previous turbo daily driver about once a week until they closed the track near me. Even though my turbo Vette was designed to be track capable, it mostly sees car shows.
Luckily with high HP turbo cars, it's drivable as long as you don't mash the pedal.
After testing several, I settled on this spring as the base.. 7/8" OD with a 0.080" wire diameter...
I cut the spring down in length until it was the right length (to bump up the spring rate), then I made a 3.5mm thick spacer to preload the spring to bump up the starting force...
Fully compressed, no coil bind...
New setup is 60N force for 7mm travel, so 49 lb/in.. a good starting point to test...









[/QUOTE]


