LQ4 into a 3rd Gen/1972 Nova

I could also do the extended turndown tips, to exit as close to the rear as I can without having it really hanging below the bumper..
The raw/dirty/racey/purposeful/obnoxious look I'm kinda liking now is along these lines..
The tailpipe routing would be going over or under the axle (under more likely) and then spreading wider while staying high (if over-axle) or angling upwards (if under-axle), snaking between the coilovers and the front dog-eared corners of the gas tank, then rearwards on the sides of the gas tank (unsure if I'll route inboard, outboard, or underneath the framerails.. or trim the framerails upwards). Any tailpipe design/location aft of the back of the gas tank and other than straight back will be purely aesthetic choice and not driven by any physical constraints.
Maybe something closer to this? There's probably 12" of room between the rear of the gas tank and the bumper (think of how long the filler neck is).. enough room to make a bit of a Z shape in the tailpipes to narrow their spacing under the bumper in from the wide width of the frame rails..
Last edited by frojoe; Jan 25, 2017 at 07:16 PM.
I agree on keeping the tank under the trunk. You gotta keep some practicality in the car or it wont get driven.
After all of my drivability issues, hiccups on the autocross course, pouring over every "fuel tank solutions?" thread here and P-T, and talking to Carl at vaporworx, that's the way I'm headed (albeit with a Camaro SS pump, which supports 600 fwhp NA). A big part of that, of course, is that cost is a wash between that and a new Aeromotive pump/filter/regulator.

T,
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
The SS and CTSv require 5.5-6.5" of depth, while the ZL1 is slightly taller. My tank is 5.9" with the clearance panel I made for the Aeromotive setup, so yours should be OK unless you dropped it appreciably more than I did. I essentially need to cut a ~7" hole in place of the current 5"x5" square, and remove some of the baffling.
Vaporworx sells the mounting and lock rings for $165(!), but I'm on the prowl this weekend for a late-model Chevy from the junkyard after reading this thread. I can also use the cheaper mechanical regulator, while you'd need a PWM controller ($~500).
T,
In the grand scheme of things, making a swirl pot would actually be the easiest. My tank already has decent baffling.. at least enough that the transfer pump(s) wouldn't be sucking air all that often, the current plate/bracketry fits the Walbro body style of pump, I already have a 3rd pump that I could drop right in place, and I need to run lines up into the trunk and then back down for a rollover vent & high point for sloshing.
In theory I could just make a new tank access plate that instead of the bulkhead fittings and fuel pump brackets it currently has, it is machined to accept the CTS-V retaining ring pattern.. but I just don't feel like ******* around with all that and the additional cost of the drop-in unit and required PWM module.
Plan is to vent the hood in an appropriate area, totally seal off the radiator support, make inner fenders that fit the 275's, make a chin spoiler/air dam, and possibly make a belly pan for under the engine, between the chin spoiler and subframe crossmember, potentially extending all the way back to the firewall. Plan is to keep the pressure in the engine bay as low as possibly, and have the high velocity air flowing over the hood suck out much hot air, as well as keep the pressure in front of the intercooler/radiator as high as possible.
Here's some really good/interesting reading I came across:
1st gen Camaro hood aero testing
2nd gen Trans Am aero testing and mods
General production car aero talk
Ron Sutton's encyclopedia of aero
Last edited by frojoe; Jan 30, 2017 at 05:03 PM.
Plan is to vent the hood in an appropriate area, totally seal off the radiator support, make inner fenders that fit the 275's, make a chin spoiler/air dam, and possibly make a belly pan for under the engine, between the chin spoiler and subframe crossmember, potentially extending all the way back to the firewall. Plan is to keep the pressure in the engine bay as low as possibly, and have the high velocity air flowing over the hood suck out much hot air, as well as keep the pressure in front of the intercooler/radiator as high as possible.
Here's some really good/interesting reading I came across:
1st gen Camaro hood aero testing
2nd gen Trans Am aero testing and mods
General production car aero talk
Ron Sutton's encyclopedia of aero[/QUOTE]
I remember a few years back seeing that you played with the idea of no body bushings. What was the outcome of that?
Btw, where are you from.. neat to see more Canadians on here.
Speaking of which.. I've found a nice 3D solid model of a Nova and downloaded it, for some air dam/vent/other tweaks to model up.. because the garage is still too full of other things to wheel the car into and start taking it apart.
Then another that was a bit better, but left a lot to be desired..
Then I found this one, which look surprisingly good, but the more I looked over the different angles, a couple things started looking strange, like the height and angle of the bumpers, and around the rear quarter window and decklid..
Then I found this model on Hum3D. By far had the best website, the most high-quality pics, and excellent customer service and information..
Downloaded an IGES 3D model of it and loaded it into my work program (PTC CREO, aka renamed ProEngineer)..
Last edited by frojoe; Feb 17, 2017 at 03:21 PM.





