MS vs Chromoly K member weight?
#2
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (26)
give us a call before you make a purchase... we will give you the truth about the differences with no sales pitch bs. we manufacture both and you will be surprised about what you may hear otherwise. actual weights may not be advertised with engine mounts so be careful about the numbers between weight and cost.
#3
Internet Mechanic
iTrader: (17)
I was told by a very knowledgable member about the ratio of MS to Chromoly in terms of weight and this was in terms of a roll cage. I do not have the specific on the ratio as it was a while back. I'll see if I can find it, or if they decide to post it up. From what I can remember was that it was suprisingly not as much as I might of thought.
Also a great point is to ask if Engine Motor Mounts are included in their advertised weights.
This would be a good time to decided IF you want to keep the Power Steering or delete it as with some companies it does make a difference.
Also a great point is to ask if Engine Motor Mounts are included in their advertised weights.
This would be a good time to decided IF you want to keep the Power Steering or delete it as with some companies it does make a difference.
#5
Internet Mechanic
iTrader: (17)
Not to get too into the metallurgy side of things. In terms of Hardness CM is more "brittle" then M/S and maybe considered "Stronger" then M/S but since there is less meterial/mass which = weight savings I would have a hard time arguing that.
Like the Process of Titanium, for a given "Mass/Size" compared to lets say a M/S you can have equivilent strength but need less.
I personally would be wary of taking a stock weighted car (minimal weight reduction) and putting it on the bumper and not expecting to breaking the K-member when it slams on the ground where as I have personally seen F bodies go on the bumper on stock k members and verified almost no damage.
Just my opinion, could be wrong, but I feel strong in this way.
Like the Process of Titanium, for a given "Mass/Size" compared to lets say a M/S you can have equivilent strength but need less.
I personally would be wary of taking a stock weighted car (minimal weight reduction) and putting it on the bumper and not expecting to breaking the K-member when it slams on the ground where as I have personally seen F bodies go on the bumper on stock k members and verified almost no damage.
Just my opinion, could be wrong, but I feel strong in this way.
#7
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (28)
I called around and got all the weights a few years ago when I was looking into just this jim. I think I posted it with joelster if you want to look, it might have been on the old NYFbody site.
There are some nice lightweight Kmembers out there, for sure. But it comes down to on a car like yours and mine. If you need to run LS1 motor mounts, stock style lower control arms, and PS with the stock rock. It will be between the BMR and PA one. BMR all fit great and are strong. PA was 1st Procraft of somthing way back in the day. the the jason started his one thing PA. I guess its better, but still not as nice as BMR stuff. If you run the stock rack on the PA in not in the right spot and one side of the boot rubs. You've seen the PA on on bills car but remebed he changed the rack mounts, so that fit better on his. I have no ide on the MWC one if you get some numbers post them up, They might have something better and thaw would be great. I know your asking between 4130 and MS, no BS but just get the MS BMR one. And get somthing else to save weight. Nothing beats the weight they save for the price, unless you getting all new front end stuff with a race car you want to get under 2800. Thats I know of your not going to get a 4130 Kemeber with engine stands that lighter then 5#s of the BMR steel one, and if so it will cost $250-500$ more. There still a ton of lighter things you can buy for your car thats 15-20#s for that money.
just gona post some info if you didnt already do this......
My stock Kemeber with iron stands bolted to it was 57.5#'s BTW. The BMR is 24.5 I weight them myself. I can't find the PA weights right now, But I remember I think it was 22# for the mild steel, and 19 for 4130 ($85 more) And there stands are mild steel and weight 8.5. So thats more then the BMR, and it cost more. The UMI Kemeber is really heavy at 29, and that retarded "road race" one is 35. Spohn one gets up in price too, and only a few pounds lighter.
PA
93-02 Camaro/Firebird K-members 4th Gen 93-02 Camaro/Firebird K-members 4th Gen
- Color Black
- Material Mild Steel
- Motor Mounts LS1
- Rack Option Standard Rack
- Road Race Option No
- Year 1998-2002 $369.00
98-2002 Camaro/Firebird LS1 Tubular Solid Motor Mounts
$119.95
Sub-Total: $488.95 MS
$569.95 4130
BMR K-member, LS1 Motor Mounts, Factory Rack Mounts
$449.95 ea. (newEra)
SPohn
704-4130B Tubular K-Member - LSx Engines - 1993-2002 GM F-Body: Camaro & Firebird $465.00
Install LSx Motor Mount Pads $50.00
Material Type: 4130N Chrome Moly $250.00
Rack To Be Installed: Stock Rack
992B Tubular LSx Solid Motor Mounts - 1998-2002 GM F-Body: Camaro & Firebird $149.00 $149.00
Color: Gloss Black
SUBTOTAL: $914.00
racecraft
1993-2002 Camaro 4130 K-Member
* Motor Mounts - LS1 Motor Mounts
* CrossMember - OEM CrossMember
Rack Mounts - OEM 93-02 4th Gen Rack Mounts
Tow Hooks - No Tow Hooks
Sub-Total: $524.00
Weights
# K-member with LS1 mounts 20.2 lbs
# K-member with LT1 mounts 18.3 lbs.
# K-member w/o mounts 15.6 lbs.
steel $399.00
Racecraft K-Member with Mounts: 21.6 lbs
(but you still have to get the stands to hold the motor)
ve the mounts that go to the motor. So you either have to run the poly sheels that are not super light for $50 or the soild style MWC had and that new motive? shop. XSSIve guy sells for $80. The spohn dose, but the motor mounts really high with them, and the motor it fixed soild so remeber tho pull the trans you have to simi take thouse engine bolts out, so the motor tilts a little.
If your gona run a motor plate, and a diffrent rack, then the PA (ok) racecraft (very nice), and MWC in 4130 can save some weight, (and cost a bunch more)
There are some nice lightweight Kmembers out there, for sure. But it comes down to on a car like yours and mine. If you need to run LS1 motor mounts, stock style lower control arms, and PS with the stock rock. It will be between the BMR and PA one. BMR all fit great and are strong. PA was 1st Procraft of somthing way back in the day. the the jason started his one thing PA. I guess its better, but still not as nice as BMR stuff. If you run the stock rack on the PA in not in the right spot and one side of the boot rubs. You've seen the PA on on bills car but remebed he changed the rack mounts, so that fit better on his. I have no ide on the MWC one if you get some numbers post them up, They might have something better and thaw would be great. I know your asking between 4130 and MS, no BS but just get the MS BMR one. And get somthing else to save weight. Nothing beats the weight they save for the price, unless you getting all new front end stuff with a race car you want to get under 2800. Thats I know of your not going to get a 4130 Kemeber with engine stands that lighter then 5#s of the BMR steel one, and if so it will cost $250-500$ more. There still a ton of lighter things you can buy for your car thats 15-20#s for that money.
just gona post some info if you didnt already do this......
My stock Kemeber with iron stands bolted to it was 57.5#'s BTW. The BMR is 24.5 I weight them myself. I can't find the PA weights right now, But I remember I think it was 22# for the mild steel, and 19 for 4130 ($85 more) And there stands are mild steel and weight 8.5. So thats more then the BMR, and it cost more. The UMI Kemeber is really heavy at 29, and that retarded "road race" one is 35. Spohn one gets up in price too, and only a few pounds lighter.
PA
93-02 Camaro/Firebird K-members 4th Gen 93-02 Camaro/Firebird K-members 4th Gen
- Color Black
- Material Mild Steel
- Motor Mounts LS1
- Rack Option Standard Rack
- Road Race Option No
- Year 1998-2002 $369.00
98-2002 Camaro/Firebird LS1 Tubular Solid Motor Mounts
$119.95
Sub-Total: $488.95 MS
$569.95 4130
BMR K-member, LS1 Motor Mounts, Factory Rack Mounts
$449.95 ea. (newEra)
SPohn
704-4130B Tubular K-Member - LSx Engines - 1993-2002 GM F-Body: Camaro & Firebird $465.00
Install LSx Motor Mount Pads $50.00
Material Type: 4130N Chrome Moly $250.00
Rack To Be Installed: Stock Rack
992B Tubular LSx Solid Motor Mounts - 1998-2002 GM F-Body: Camaro & Firebird $149.00 $149.00
Color: Gloss Black
SUBTOTAL: $914.00
racecraft
1993-2002 Camaro 4130 K-Member
* Motor Mounts - LS1 Motor Mounts
* CrossMember - OEM CrossMember
Rack Mounts - OEM 93-02 4th Gen Rack Mounts
Tow Hooks - No Tow Hooks
Sub-Total: $524.00
Weights
# K-member with LS1 mounts 20.2 lbs
# K-member with LT1 mounts 18.3 lbs.
# K-member w/o mounts 15.6 lbs.
steel $399.00
Racecraft K-Member with Mounts: 21.6 lbs
(but you still have to get the stands to hold the motor)
ve the mounts that go to the motor. So you either have to run the poly sheels that are not super light for $50 or the soild style MWC had and that new motive? shop. XSSIve guy sells for $80. The spohn dose, but the motor mounts really high with them, and the motor it fixed soild so remeber tho pull the trans you have to simi take thouse engine bolts out, so the motor tilts a little.
If your gona run a motor plate, and a diffrent rack, then the PA (ok) racecraft (very nice), and MWC in 4130 can save some weight, (and cost a bunch more)
Last edited by studderin; 12-27-2010 at 03:13 PM.
Trending Topics
#8
FormerVendor
iTrader: (77)
www.americanironracing.com and www.camaromustangchallenge.com
Our K-member is not the lightest on the market, we never said it was or advertised it as being so. We built it for all types of driving including road racing, drag racing and street driving. We are proud to announce no failures.
#11
A friend of mine did the install at his shop. He was not a happy guy afterwards, lol. I bought it as a package deal from BYUNSPEED on here. The lower a-arms saved as much weight as the k-member which I thought was odd. Price was reasonable at $750ish for the k-member and a-arms, shipping sucked (1.5 months), parts look great still, and the fitment was so-so.
#12
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pocatello Idaho
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A friend of mine did the install at his shop. He was not a happy guy afterwards, lol. I bought it as a package deal from BYUNSPEED on here. The lower a-arms saved as much weight as the k-member which I thought was odd. Price was reasonable at $750ish for the k-member and a-arms, shipping sucked (1.5 months), parts look great still, and the fitment was so-so.
All that said I don't have any aftermarket Kmember and though I have plans for one in the future it is still a ways out. Just pointing out your possible fitment issues.
#14
8 Second Club
iTrader: (67)
chromoly and mild steel actually weigh the same. the weight savings comes in since you run a thinner wall with CM vs MS. example: MS cage you would use .120 wall and CM you would use .083 wall. there is your weight savings, about 30% less material material so 30% less weight. a 6 point MS rollbar usually wieghs around 100 lbs or so and CM around 70 lbs. so in something smaller like a k-member there isnt a huge weight difference for the added cost.
#15
chromoly and mild steel actually weigh the same. the weight savings comes in since you run a thinner wall with CM vs MS. example: MS cage you would use .120 wall and CM you would use .083 wall. there is your weight savings, about 30% less material material so 30% less weight. a 6 point MS rollbar usually wieghs around 100 lbs or so and CM around 70 lbs. so in something smaller like a k-member there isnt a huge weight difference for the added cost.
#17
Our "retarded" road race K-member is being used in CMC and American Iron classes with no failures...
www.americanironracing.com and www.camaromustangchallenge.com
Our K-member is not the lightest on the market, we never said it was or advertised it as being so. We built it for all types of driving including road racing, drag racing and street d
riving. We are proud to announce no failures.
www.americanironracing.com and www.camaromustangchallenge.com
Our K-member is not the lightest on the market, we never said it was or advertised it as being so. We built it for all types of driving including road racing, drag racing and street d
riving. We are proud to announce no failures.
I am very happy with the fit of my UMI K member and its performance.
#18
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (14)
Retarded RR K-member? Really?
I've seen pictures of BMR Ks pull apart at the weld seams which is indicative of poor craftsmanship or poor engineering. One is workers that don't care the other is because R&D wasn't up to speed.
I've witnessed PA Ks sheer the mounting tabs where the steering rack mounts and send cars into walls.
Feedback to both camps has basically told those with the issues to pound sand ... never heard of the issue ... excuse after excuse to cover up and carry on.
I was also around when UMI first posted up their version of a K-Member. Ryan was ripped because it was inadequately braced to accommodate road race loading and wheel stand bouncing.
There was a long discussion about it on FRRAX.
http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/index.php?showtopic=7319
Ryan's personal commitment to making a quality product by soliciting feedback from a bunch of folks who actually use the product instead of "eye-balling" it or however it was designed.
Think about it ... build a component based upon best guess, send it to production, sell it, monitor failures and react subsequent to that. That means the customer base does the R&D and pays to do so.
I didn't see UMI doing that. Impressive.
Sure you could go for years and not have an issue with ANY K-member. But it's been proven time after time that the probability of failure is high on some manufacturers than others.
What I find laughable are those that haggle over 5-10 lbs on a K-member and still run AC, subs/amps, air bags, full exhaust and/or a back seat.
I mean come on ... is it a race car or some bastardized version of one? Until you strip the damn thing of every ounce you can, then don't **** and moan about 10lbs of bracing. You'll need it more than likely.
Am I a UMI nutswinger? Not by a long shot.
I don't like the articulating in the middle control arms. I think they are a failure waiting to happen and have told Ryan as much.
I've seen pictures of BMR Ks pull apart at the weld seams which is indicative of poor craftsmanship or poor engineering. One is workers that don't care the other is because R&D wasn't up to speed.
I've witnessed PA Ks sheer the mounting tabs where the steering rack mounts and send cars into walls.
Feedback to both camps has basically told those with the issues to pound sand ... never heard of the issue ... excuse after excuse to cover up and carry on.
I was also around when UMI first posted up their version of a K-Member. Ryan was ripped because it was inadequately braced to accommodate road race loading and wheel stand bouncing.
There was a long discussion about it on FRRAX.
http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/index.php?showtopic=7319
Ryan's personal commitment to making a quality product by soliciting feedback from a bunch of folks who actually use the product instead of "eye-balling" it or however it was designed.
Think about it ... build a component based upon best guess, send it to production, sell it, monitor failures and react subsequent to that. That means the customer base does the R&D and pays to do so.
I didn't see UMI doing that. Impressive.
Sure you could go for years and not have an issue with ANY K-member. But it's been proven time after time that the probability of failure is high on some manufacturers than others.
What I find laughable are those that haggle over 5-10 lbs on a K-member and still run AC, subs/amps, air bags, full exhaust and/or a back seat.
I mean come on ... is it a race car or some bastardized version of one? Until you strip the damn thing of every ounce you can, then don't **** and moan about 10lbs of bracing. You'll need it more than likely.
Am I a UMI nutswinger? Not by a long shot.
I don't like the articulating in the middle control arms. I think they are a failure waiting to happen and have told Ryan as much.
#20
10 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alloway,NJ
Posts: 2,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i too have the UMI kmember w/ upper and lower a arms... im am MORE then happy w/ it, ive had it for 4 years never an issuse and fitment was perfect
like chris said, I too will take extra strength of the double tube design over a mezzy 5lbs
-brandon
like chris said, I too will take extra strength of the double tube design over a mezzy 5lbs
-brandon