Kuwait : 10.6s @ +128 mph N/A throgh 346 c.i. & M6 w/ ARE heads + TR 230/224 ( long )
02-23-2003, 11:24 AM
#1
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Kuwait : 10.6s @ +128 mph N/A throgh 346 c.i. & M6 w/ ARE heads + TR 230/224 ( long ) Hi all ,
First of all , I want to say that I got my best in thersday , but I was very busy and coulden't have time to write this thread until today , especially that I am bad in english language as I usually say .
LS1 engine never stop suprize all , I remember when first stroker had been made from MTI when it get 11.7 I think , and it was N/A ..... they were happy with this result , and then when they could get into 11s with heads and cam only , and all were shocked how can this engine do that ....... also I remember in the begining of 2001 when the very first 422 c.i. came , it was belong to Stephen (colonel) when he got 10.5 N/A ..... all was happy with this result and alot said that this is it , LS1 can't make quiker than this E.T. N/A ...... but as we are seeing every day LS1 give us a new records , now heads and cam and M6 is near to mid 10s ..... this 10.6 was made with 4.56 gear ratio , what if it was with shorter gears ??
Any way , sorry for this long life story .... here I will start :
Well ...... Finally I finished from This year Test , it was between MTI X1 Cam and TR 230/224 cam .
To know about what I am doing here is the link :
https://ls1tech.com/ubb/cgi-bin/ulti...c;f=5;t=003765
My previous best with my mods here :
https://ls1tech.com/ubb/ultimatebb.p...c;f=5;t=000586
Before 2 weeks I've got from the track after test the X1 Cam , check here :
https://ls1tech.com/ubb/ultimatebb.p...c;f=5;t=003902
And I am sure that the car has better than 10.80 with this X1 cam !!
So , the time turned to Thunder racing cam , After we installed it I planned to get shorter gear rato than 4.56 , but I didn't find better than it especially with shorter than 4.56 I may have to shift to 5th before the end of 1/4 mile , that because with 4.56 I cross the end almost at 6800 . any way , I already didn''t find shorter than it available here .
About TR 230/224 , its a great cam , and also rough cam , just the way I like , Both were great X1 and TR cam , the car still has the driveability and still I can call it a daily driver car , just you need to change the gear ratio and get 4.10 or if you want better go for 3.73 , and you will be happy with the car <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> , The cam was in the car before 10 days , we drove the car alot and pull on it alot , to make sure that every thing is OK befor going to the track , that we didn't do it with X1 cam . Maybe if we did it with X1 we could get better E.T. than 10.80s .
I was very buzy in last few days , so we coulden't make it to the track until Thursday ..... the advantge of our track that in wed and thursday they keep opening until 4 a.m <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="gr_eek2.gif" /> that because the weekend here in Kuwait is in Thursday and Friday , not like USA ( Satrday and Sunday ) So most people has nothing to do in Thursday and Friday morning , so they go to the track until late time , also the competitions always be at this 2 days ( Wed and thursday )....... <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
Weather is somehow high in early night , but from 1 a.m. its start to be colder and colder , we went at 2.30 a.m. , Weather was around 50F and was becoming colder . When I made first pass I dropped the clutch at 5500 rpm , and here what I've got :
60' : 01.578s
1/8 : 07.170s @ 099.350 mph
1/4 : 11.091s @ 125.421 mph
between 1/8 & 1/4 3.921s and 26.071 mph
after this pass I made a comparing between X1 and TR 230/224 that I have it now ..... with X1 cam my worest 60' in the 5 passes that I made with X1 was 1.57 ( dropped at 6000 rpm ) and now in first pass with TR 230/224 I have got also 1.57 ( Dropped at 5500 rpm ) . now here is the different
X1 230/227 : 1.57s @ 10.915s @ 126.260 mph
TR 230/224 : 1.57s @ 11.091s @ 125.421 mph
Maybe with X1 I've got better E.T. because I dropped the clutch at 6000 rpm and with TR cam I dropped at 5500 rpm <img border="0" title="" alt="[Roll Eyes]" src="images/icons/rolleyes.gif" /> !!!!! although I've got 1.57s in 60' and with same shifts as I can say .
Any way , I waited until 3 a.m. when the weather became 45 F , and the car had been colder and ready to anothor pass ..... This time I did a huge burnout and I dropped the clutch at around 6400 rpm , daaam the car juamped like a rocket with 28" tires
60' : 01.536s
1/8 : 06.949s @ 101.313 mph
1/4 : 10.771s @ 127.418 mph
between 1/8 & 1/4 3.822s and 26.105 mph
HELL YEEEAAAAHHHH <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> ...... That was AWESOME 10.7s @ 127 mph in only the 2nd pass ...... that cam is damn stronger than what I thought.
I tried to Drop the clutch at 6600 rpm , its spin alot on this tires
60' : 01.660s
1/8 : 07.380s @ 097.003 mph
1/4 : 11.473s @ 122.946 mph
between 1/8 & 1/4 4.093s and 25.943 mph
It was a bad idea , but this time I want to drop at 6600+ rpm , so their was a guy has 28" tires and he said that it hooked great but need a serious burnot , we installed it , the clock turned to 4 a.m. , but alot were intrested of this pass that I made , so alot were witing to see what can this car makes with new tires . so they didn't colse the track because of me <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
After burnot , I've got ready to jump , weather was really cold at this time (41F) , raved it to 6600+ and dropped the clutch ....... I can't say anything , you just see and tell
60' : 01.509s
1/8 : 06.891s @ 101.955 mph
1/4 : 10.688s @ 128.114 mph
between 1/8 & 1/4 3.797s and 26.159 mph
What can I say guys ??? It was really unexpected results , not the E.T. and even not the high trap speed ...... all were shocked , How could an n/a 346 c.i. 6 speeds car got this E.T. ??? and with Hydrolic cam ??? All came to congrats me , alot said that this car has larger engine not like what I am saying , some thought that I used nitrous , I told them , car is yours ...... check it as much as you want and see what it has and what it hasn't ....... really I didn't thought that the car can made that , OK .... maybe the E.T. is possible , but what about the trap speed ? its too high for a 346 c.i. hydrolic cam !!!
MTI X1 vs. Thunder Racing 230/224
Any way , as we saw that I got better E.t. with TR230/224 because alot of things I will talk about them , but I noticed something , maybe its not a big deal but I think I better let every one know , that from 1/8 to 1/4 mile with X1 I felt that it has better acceleratoin than TR 230/224 , how is that ?? I'll tell you , when I see the accelerate from 1/8 to 1/4 with MTI X1 cam I see that the mph between 1/8 & 1/4 is 26.558 mph in the worst run and 26.603 mph in the best run, but with TR 230/224 the best was 26.159 mph , maybe its not an important thing but although with TR 230/224 the jump was great and the E.T. was great but although of that the accelerate was little bit less.
Now about why I get better E.T. with TR cam . The different was that TR cam had better chance than MTI X1 cam :
1- TR cam was installed by an expert , while X1 was installed by us .... well , we can't say that this was disadvantage for X1 cam , but this point you must know about it .... well , I think we installed it right .
2- with X1 cam I hadn't chance to drive it alot before going to the track , while with TR cam , we installed it and then we drove the car too much and pulled on it before going to the track . That what maybe let the cam to take its place right ..... hmmmm I don't know how to expline , I hope you got it .
3- Weather was 44F with X1 and 41F with best E.T. of TR cam .
4- At the best of X1 cam I dropped the clutch at 6200 rpm , while at the best of TR cam I dropped the clutch at +6600 rpm .
Now here you go :
MTI X1 230/227 .591/.571 112 : (44F) Dropped at 6200 rpm 01.545s - 10.806s - 126.861 mph
Tunder 230/224 .575/.563 111 : (41F) Dropped @ +6600 rpm 01.509s - 10.688s - 128.114 mph
Sorry that I coulden't test this 2 cams with similar !!cercomistanses!! ( I know its a wrong spiling ) .....
Again Thats not mean that Thunder Racing 230/224 is better than MTI X1 cam , that because of the great chances that TR cam got over X1 cam , and I saw that after 1/8 mile X1 has better accelerate .......as I saw this 2 cams have similar results , and both give same power , both are great and its difficult to chose wich one of them you want ...... and both are a driveable cam .
again too , here is the diffrence between last year and this year with this changes ( larger cam , LT headers , PCM tuning and 12-bolts )
01.610s - 11.197s - 124.986 mph
01.509s - 10.688s - 128.114 mph
Note :
This is important guys , with this results I am not saying that my car is faster than any other car with similar stuff , and not saying that mine is makes more power and tourqe than others , but the advantage that Kuwait has a great sea level , that what help the car to makes this great results and makes the car breath better than anothor place , what I am saying that if I test the car in USA which had different sea level than Kuwait , I will not make this results .On the other hand , you guys ... if you bring your car here , you will get better than me also , better than what you are getting in your place ...... for example , if some one get 11.00s , in Kuwait he will get 10.7 or 10.6 ...... I hope you've got the point .
Now , I wish to reinstall the X1 cam again and give it better chance to make better results than what I got from it before .... but my friend want his cams to sell them , so he got the X1 cam and we removed TR 230/224 cam and reinstalled my previous Lunati 226/226 cam , the cam that I love , I wish to go to the track with this cam and see what can I make with it ....... my best with this cam was my best last year , it was 11.1s @ +124 mph (1.61s 60') was with 10-bolts , MAC headers and no pcm work , but this time we've got 12-bolts , long tube headers and LS1-edit .... just waiting the file of LS1-edit from Tawfeeq (RUF SS)
I finished from 2003 , so here you go
2000 : 13.3s @ 107 mph ( Bone Stock )
2001 : 11.6s @ 120 mph ( Cam only -compcam 212/218 )
2002 : 11.1s @ 124 mph ( ARE Heads and Lunati Cam 226/226 )
2003 : 10.6s - 10.8s @ 126 - 128 mph ( ARE heads and TR230/224&MTI X1 230/227 cam )
Be tuned for 2003 project to make the new record for 2004 ...... it will be a Stroked Solid cam set-up from Futral Motor Sports (FMS) inshalla .
Thank you guys and I am so sorry for this long post
Thanks and good luck <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
From
Kuwait
Abdulla
or we can say Abdullah
10.6s @ 128 mph N/A ( LS1 , 346 c.i. , Heads , Hydrolic Cam , 6 speeds )
First of all , I want to say that I got my best in thersday , but I was very busy and coulden't have time to write this thread until today , especially that I am bad in english language as I usually say .
LS1 engine never stop suprize all , I remember when first stroker had been made from MTI when it get 11.7 I think , and it was N/A ..... they were happy with this result , and then when they could get into 11s with heads and cam only , and all were shocked how can this engine do that ....... also I remember in the begining of 2001 when the very first 422 c.i. came , it was belong to Stephen (colonel) when he got 10.5 N/A ..... all was happy with this result and alot said that this is it , LS1 can't make quiker than this E.T. N/A ...... but as we are seeing every day LS1 give us a new records , now heads and cam and M6 is near to mid 10s ..... this 10.6 was made with 4.56 gear ratio , what if it was with shorter gears ??
Any way , sorry for this long life story .... here I will start :
Well ...... Finally I finished from This year Test , it was between MTI X1 Cam and TR 230/224 cam .
To know about what I am doing here is the link :
https://ls1tech.com/ubb/cgi-bin/ulti...c;f=5;t=003765
My previous best with my mods here :
https://ls1tech.com/ubb/ultimatebb.p...c;f=5;t=000586
Before 2 weeks I've got from the track after test the X1 Cam , check here :
https://ls1tech.com/ubb/ultimatebb.p...c;f=5;t=003902
And I am sure that the car has better than 10.80 with this X1 cam !!
So , the time turned to Thunder racing cam , After we installed it I planned to get shorter gear rato than 4.56 , but I didn't find better than it especially with shorter than 4.56 I may have to shift to 5th before the end of 1/4 mile , that because with 4.56 I cross the end almost at 6800 . any way , I already didn''t find shorter than it available here .
About TR 230/224 , its a great cam , and also rough cam , just the way I like , Both were great X1 and TR cam , the car still has the driveability and still I can call it a daily driver car , just you need to change the gear ratio and get 4.10 or if you want better go for 3.73 , and you will be happy with the car <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> , The cam was in the car before 10 days , we drove the car alot and pull on it alot , to make sure that every thing is OK befor going to the track , that we didn't do it with X1 cam . Maybe if we did it with X1 we could get better E.T. than 10.80s .
I was very buzy in last few days , so we coulden't make it to the track until Thursday ..... the advantge of our track that in wed and thursday they keep opening until 4 a.m <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="gr_eek2.gif" /> that because the weekend here in Kuwait is in Thursday and Friday , not like USA ( Satrday and Sunday ) So most people has nothing to do in Thursday and Friday morning , so they go to the track until late time , also the competitions always be at this 2 days ( Wed and thursday )....... <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
Weather is somehow high in early night , but from 1 a.m. its start to be colder and colder , we went at 2.30 a.m. , Weather was around 50F and was becoming colder . When I made first pass I dropped the clutch at 5500 rpm , and here what I've got :
60' : 01.578s
1/8 : 07.170s @ 099.350 mph
1/4 : 11.091s @ 125.421 mph
between 1/8 & 1/4 3.921s and 26.071 mph
after this pass I made a comparing between X1 and TR 230/224 that I have it now ..... with X1 cam my worest 60' in the 5 passes that I made with X1 was 1.57 ( dropped at 6000 rpm ) and now in first pass with TR 230/224 I have got also 1.57 ( Dropped at 5500 rpm ) . now here is the different
X1 230/227 : 1.57s @ 10.915s @ 126.260 mph
TR 230/224 : 1.57s @ 11.091s @ 125.421 mph
Maybe with X1 I've got better E.T. because I dropped the clutch at 6000 rpm and with TR cam I dropped at 5500 rpm <img border="0" title="" alt="[Roll Eyes]" src="images/icons/rolleyes.gif" /> !!!!! although I've got 1.57s in 60' and with same shifts as I can say .
Any way , I waited until 3 a.m. when the weather became 45 F , and the car had been colder and ready to anothor pass ..... This time I did a huge burnout and I dropped the clutch at around 6400 rpm , daaam the car juamped like a rocket with 28" tires
60' : 01.536s
1/8 : 06.949s @ 101.313 mph
1/4 : 10.771s @ 127.418 mph
between 1/8 & 1/4 3.822s and 26.105 mph
HELL YEEEAAAAHHHH <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> ...... That was AWESOME 10.7s @ 127 mph in only the 2nd pass ...... that cam is damn stronger than what I thought.
I tried to Drop the clutch at 6600 rpm , its spin alot on this tires
60' : 01.660s
1/8 : 07.380s @ 097.003 mph
1/4 : 11.473s @ 122.946 mph
between 1/8 & 1/4 4.093s and 25.943 mph
It was a bad idea , but this time I want to drop at 6600+ rpm , so their was a guy has 28" tires and he said that it hooked great but need a serious burnot , we installed it , the clock turned to 4 a.m. , but alot were intrested of this pass that I made , so alot were witing to see what can this car makes with new tires . so they didn't colse the track because of me <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
After burnot , I've got ready to jump , weather was really cold at this time (41F) , raved it to 6600+ and dropped the clutch ....... I can't say anything , you just see and tell
60' : 01.509s
1/8 : 06.891s @ 101.955 mph
1/4 : 10.688s @ 128.114 mph
between 1/8 & 1/4 3.797s and 26.159 mph
What can I say guys ??? It was really unexpected results , not the E.T. and even not the high trap speed ...... all were shocked , How could an n/a 346 c.i. 6 speeds car got this E.T. ??? and with Hydrolic cam ??? All came to congrats me , alot said that this car has larger engine not like what I am saying , some thought that I used nitrous , I told them , car is yours ...... check it as much as you want and see what it has and what it hasn't ....... really I didn't thought that the car can made that , OK .... maybe the E.T. is possible , but what about the trap speed ? its too high for a 346 c.i. hydrolic cam !!!
MTI X1 vs. Thunder Racing 230/224
Any way , as we saw that I got better E.t. with TR230/224 because alot of things I will talk about them , but I noticed something , maybe its not a big deal but I think I better let every one know , that from 1/8 to 1/4 mile with X1 I felt that it has better acceleratoin than TR 230/224 , how is that ?? I'll tell you , when I see the accelerate from 1/8 to 1/4 with MTI X1 cam I see that the mph between 1/8 & 1/4 is 26.558 mph in the worst run and 26.603 mph in the best run, but with TR 230/224 the best was 26.159 mph , maybe its not an important thing but although with TR 230/224 the jump was great and the E.T. was great but although of that the accelerate was little bit less.
Now about why I get better E.T. with TR cam . The different was that TR cam had better chance than MTI X1 cam :
1- TR cam was installed by an expert , while X1 was installed by us .... well , we can't say that this was disadvantage for X1 cam , but this point you must know about it .... well , I think we installed it right .
2- with X1 cam I hadn't chance to drive it alot before going to the track , while with TR cam , we installed it and then we drove the car too much and pulled on it before going to the track . That what maybe let the cam to take its place right ..... hmmmm I don't know how to expline , I hope you got it .
3- Weather was 44F with X1 and 41F with best E.T. of TR cam .
4- At the best of X1 cam I dropped the clutch at 6200 rpm , while at the best of TR cam I dropped the clutch at +6600 rpm .
Now here you go :
MTI X1 230/227 .591/.571 112 : (44F) Dropped at 6200 rpm 01.545s - 10.806s - 126.861 mph
Tunder 230/224 .575/.563 111 : (41F) Dropped @ +6600 rpm 01.509s - 10.688s - 128.114 mph
Sorry that I coulden't test this 2 cams with similar !!cercomistanses!! ( I know its a wrong spiling ) .....
Again Thats not mean that Thunder Racing 230/224 is better than MTI X1 cam , that because of the great chances that TR cam got over X1 cam , and I saw that after 1/8 mile X1 has better accelerate .......as I saw this 2 cams have similar results , and both give same power , both are great and its difficult to chose wich one of them you want ...... and both are a driveable cam .
again too , here is the diffrence between last year and this year with this changes ( larger cam , LT headers , PCM tuning and 12-bolts )
01.610s - 11.197s - 124.986 mph
01.509s - 10.688s - 128.114 mph
Note :
This is important guys , with this results I am not saying that my car is faster than any other car with similar stuff , and not saying that mine is makes more power and tourqe than others , but the advantage that Kuwait has a great sea level , that what help the car to makes this great results and makes the car breath better than anothor place , what I am saying that if I test the car in USA which had different sea level than Kuwait , I will not make this results .On the other hand , you guys ... if you bring your car here , you will get better than me also , better than what you are getting in your place ...... for example , if some one get 11.00s , in Kuwait he will get 10.7 or 10.6 ...... I hope you've got the point .
Now , I wish to reinstall the X1 cam again and give it better chance to make better results than what I got from it before .... but my friend want his cams to sell them , so he got the X1 cam and we removed TR 230/224 cam and reinstalled my previous Lunati 226/226 cam , the cam that I love , I wish to go to the track with this cam and see what can I make with it ....... my best with this cam was my best last year , it was 11.1s @ +124 mph (1.61s 60') was with 10-bolts , MAC headers and no pcm work , but this time we've got 12-bolts , long tube headers and LS1-edit .... just waiting the file of LS1-edit from Tawfeeq (RUF SS)
I finished from 2003 , so here you go
2000 : 13.3s @ 107 mph ( Bone Stock )
2001 : 11.6s @ 120 mph ( Cam only -compcam 212/218 )
2002 : 11.1s @ 124 mph ( ARE Heads and Lunati Cam 226/226 )
2003 : 10.6s - 10.8s @ 126 - 128 mph ( ARE heads and TR230/224&MTI X1 230/227 cam )
Be tuned for 2003 project to make the new record for 2004 ...... it will be a Stroked Solid cam set-up from Futral Motor Sports (FMS) inshalla .
Thank you guys and I am so sorry for this long post
Thanks and good luck <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
From
Kuwait
Abdulla
or we can say Abdullah
10.6s @ 128 mph N/A ( LS1 , 346 c.i. , Heads , Hydrolic Cam , 6 speeds )
02-23-2003, 11:26 AM
#2
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Kuwait : 10.6s @ +128 mph N/A throgh 346 c.i. & M6 w/ ARE heads + TR 230/224 ( long ) Holly WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="gr_eek2.gif" /> , its really a loooong post , I don't know who want to read all of this !!!!!!! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="gr_eek2.gif" />
02-23-2003, 11:44 AM
#4
Launching!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Kuwait : 10.6s @ +128 mph N/A throgh 346 c.i. & M6 w/ ARE heads + TR 230/224 ( long ) Sounds like you have a really impressive combination that is working very well for you! Congratulations on getting your new best 1/4 times!
I'm assuming that the Trans Am is a rare car in Kuwait. What do people think about the car over there? Do they like it?
When are you going to build a 427 stroker and really shock them? <img border="0" title="" alt="[Cool]" src="gr_images/icons/cool.gif" />
I'm assuming that the Trans Am is a rare car in Kuwait. What do people think about the car over there? Do they like it?
When are you going to build a 427 stroker and really shock them? <img border="0" title="" alt="[Cool]" src="gr_images/icons/cool.gif" />
02-23-2003, 11:46 AM
#5
11 Second Club
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: gilbertsville, PA
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Kuwait : 10.6s @ +128 mph N/A throgh 346 c.i. & M6 w/ ARE heads + TR 230/224 ( long ) Abdulla,
Congratulations! Alot of hard work is paying off.
10.60s on a stock bottom end is incredible. Great driving too.
Take care.
Congratulations! Alot of hard work is paying off.
10.60s on a stock bottom end is incredible. Great driving too.
Take care.
02-23-2003, 01:08 PM
#6
Re: Kuwait : 10.6s @ +128 mph N/A throgh 346 c.i. & M6 w/ ARE heads + TR 230/224 ( long ) You've stayed in the ls1 scene for quite some time. Very impressive man! That is really respectable that you do so in Kuwait. I spent time in Bahrain and Kuwait (rebuilt the US Embassy) in 1991. I was onboard the USS LY Spear from 1990-1992. You'd like my pictures. Keep showing them who's boss!! (of the muscle cars that is)
02-23-2003, 01:41 PM
#7
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bring it........ b*tch
Posts: 1,084
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Kuwait : 10.6s @ +128 mph N/A throgh 346 c.i. & M6 w/ ARE heads + TR 230/224 ( long ) Abdulla,
Awesome runs man!! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> I'd sure like to see you give the X1 another shot at the track. I would THINK that the X1 would come out on top, but I wonder if you gave it another shot you could top your best with the TR230. Keep it up!
--JF
Awesome runs man!! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> I'd sure like to see you give the X1 another shot at the track. I would THINK that the X1 would come out on top, but I wonder if you gave it another shot you could top your best with the TR230. Keep it up!
--JF
Trending Topics
02-23-2003, 03:11 PM
#9
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Kuwait : 10.6s @ +128 mph N/A throgh 346 c.i. & M6 w/ ARE heads + TR 230/224 ( long ) offaxis : Thank you Jermy ...... next will be stroker and solid cam from FMS inshalla <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
Ian : Thanks , well it somehow rare , but here are alot of Camaros and vettes and alot of sport cars from every where ..... and streer races are cool .... you must not miss it <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
mattf2 : thank you very much Matt ...... Good luck <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
JS : Thank you <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> ..... you too has one bad Formula <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
Redlinez : Thanks ...... thats great , I wish to see those pics <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> . BTW , I am a nighbor of USA embssy
JF WS6 : Me too , I wish to reinstall X1 cam and give it anothor pass , I am sure that I will get better E.T. with it , but my friend wants his cam . Thanks alot and good luck <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
jleews6 : Thank you <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> ..... to get answeres on your questions , check the links in the top of original post , you will find every thing
Good luck and thanks again
Ian : Thanks , well it somehow rare , but here are alot of Camaros and vettes and alot of sport cars from every where ..... and streer races are cool .... you must not miss it <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
mattf2 : thank you very much Matt ...... Good luck <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
JS : Thank you <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> ..... you too has one bad Formula <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
Redlinez : Thanks ...... thats great , I wish to see those pics <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> . BTW , I am a nighbor of USA embssy
JF WS6 : Me too , I wish to reinstall X1 cam and give it anothor pass , I am sure that I will get better E.T. with it , but my friend wants his cam . Thanks alot and good luck <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
jleews6 : Thank you <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> ..... to get answeres on your questions , check the links in the top of original post , you will find every thing
Good luck and thanks again
02-23-2003, 06:55 PM
#13
!Dial-up Director
Re: Kuwait : 10.6s @ +128 mph N/A throgh 346 c.i. & M6 w/ ARE heads + TR 230/224 ( long ) Congrats Abdulla, any chance we will see a video online of you making a pass down the track?
Justin
Justin
02-23-2003, 08:11 PM
#16
Teching In
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Kuwait : 10.6s @ +128 mph N/A throgh 346 c.i. & M6 w/ ARE heads + TR 230/224 ( long ) I would like to say congrats!!! You must have a raceweight of 500lbs if you can run that time on ARE heads.. <img border="0" alt="[jester]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_jest.gif" /> With ARE heads you cant be making more power than a cam only car.. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
02-23-2003, 11:42 PM
#17
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Kuwait : 10.6s @ +128 mph N/A throgh 346 c.i. & M6 w/ ARE heads + TR 230/224 ( long ) Fenris Ulf : Thanks <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
Tom The roofer : Thank you Tom, and I wish to you the good luck <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
Launch : Thanks alot <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
Pete Mobley : As Chris said , 98 octane and also we has 100 octane , its for .3 per liter <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
Jsears8 : Thank you Justin <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> . I said before that their are some videos about it . and we will put it in the site we are working at .
Chris ARE 360 : Yes Chris thats right <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> . Thanks
GeorgeC : Thank you George <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> . next step is to made like your engine , wish me luck .
ORLLS1 : thanks . the weight was around 3300 lb . about ARE heads , you are totally wrong , maybe some cars hadn't a good heads , but mine are great , really great , and I will stay with them for my next engine .
thanks again <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
Tom The roofer : Thank you Tom, and I wish to you the good luck <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
Launch : Thanks alot <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
Pete Mobley : As Chris said , 98 octane and also we has 100 octane , its for .3 per liter <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
Jsears8 : Thank you Justin <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> . I said before that their are some videos about it . and we will put it in the site we are working at .
Chris ARE 360 : Yes Chris thats right <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> . Thanks
GeorgeC : Thank you George <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> . next step is to made like your engine , wish me luck .
ORLLS1 : thanks . the weight was around 3300 lb . about ARE heads , you are totally wrong , maybe some cars hadn't a good heads , but mine are great , really great , and I will stay with them for my next engine .
thanks again <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
02-23-2003, 11:44 PM
#18
I can shift faster than you.
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 5,133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Kuwait : 10.6s @ +128 mph N/A throgh 346 c.i. & M6 w/ ARE heads + TR 230/224 ( long ) Nice times Abdulla! You definitely have the car setup well. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
Jason
Jason
02-24-2003, 09:56 AM
#20
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Kuwait : 10.6s @ +128 mph N/A throgh 346 c.i. & M6 w/ ARE heads + TR 230/224 ( long ) Thank you Jason , yeah thanks God that we can work <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
Take care and good luck
Take care and good luck