417 rwhp/425 rwtq N/A LS1 with stock cam!
12-16-2008, 04:51 PM
#61
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Easley, SC
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I dont have any way of recording it, but it sounds exactly the same as a stock with a louder exhaust.
I'm not one to really speculate, but if I had to guess it was gonna be in the high 11.5 range. If I had something other than the stock gear, it'd be a smidge quicker, maybe bottom .40's or so.
I'm not one to really speculate, but if I had to guess it was gonna be in the high 11.5 range. If I had something other than the stock gear, it'd be a smidge quicker, maybe bottom .40's or so.
12-16-2008, 10:50 PM
#62
It gets from the trailer, to the staging lanes, down the track, back to the trailer, all under its own power, no alt. Just charge it between passes.
Not impossible at all.
12-17-2008, 03:59 PM
#63
11 Second Club
iTrader: (39)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NW Chicago Subs
Posts: 3,321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK, these are great and realistic numbers. Yes, TQ is always higher than HP on a stock cam (except maybe the LS6 cams). That is what these cams are designed for. Keep in mind this is the Vette cam, not the F-Body cam. So more lift and durration. Also, the coment about the VE not changing with the rockers...WTH are you talking about??? Anytime you add air to the motor the VE is different. Heads, rockers and even intake will change the VE.
This car is not going to run anywhere near 11.5Xs. Way too heavy for the power and gear. It will be lucky to break 11s but should trap nice. I would guess 115 which with a stick is only good for 11.9X-11.8X tops. And all this is great for a stock cam car. Good luck and can't wait to see results.
I would love to see numbers with 02+LS6 cam and ported 90/90.
This car is not going to run anywhere near 11.5Xs. Way too heavy for the power and gear. It will be lucky to break 11s but should trap nice. I would guess 115 which with a stick is only good for 11.9X-11.8X tops. And all this is great for a stock cam car. Good luck and can't wait to see results.
I would love to see numbers with 02+LS6 cam and ported 90/90.
12-17-2008, 04:28 PM
#65
i don't know why people insist on saying people aren't truthful. This person posted up 4 different dyno's to show you. He explained everything, and still some people are skeptical. I don't understand why though. Even if the dyno read high, better for him for his bragging rights. I don't think he is even bragging either, i think he is just as amazed as we are. Don't be mad cause your head/small cam car is making less power then his, cause **** happens.
Enjoy the power, and don't care if people don't believe you.
Enjoy the power, and don't care if people don't believe you.
12-17-2008, 07:38 PM
#66
11 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BADSZ28
Keep in mind this is the Vette cam, not the F-Body cam. So more lift and durration.
Keep in mind this is the Vette cam, not the F-Body cam. So more lift and durration.
this thread makes me tempted to thwrow my 98 cam which does have more lift and duration than the 04 into my new engine....nice results...gotta love all the haters on here....
I also lol'ed on the 1.85s increasing duration....some people have no clue
12-18-2008, 09:31 AM
#68
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 18013
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
at first I was skeptical of the graphs. you have a lot of info backing you up, now you just need track times and it would be complete.
12-18-2008, 09:56 AM
#69
11 Second Club
iTrader: (39)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NW Chicago Subs
Posts: 3,321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That is news to me.
Then where does the extra power come from as they are rated at 350? Unless the F-bidies were greatly under rated and the laws changed for the Goat or something. But everything else I mentioned remains the same. And that would further prove the higher torque numbers than HP since those cams typically had a better TQ/HP ratio than the vette cams.
Then where does the extra power come from as they are rated at 350? Unless the F-bidies were greatly under rated and the laws changed for the Goat or something. But everything else I mentioned remains the same. And that would further prove the higher torque numbers than HP since those cams typically had a better TQ/HP ratio than the vette cams.
12-18-2008, 04:47 PM
#71
That is news to me.Then where does the extra power come from as they are rated at 350? Unless the F-bidies were greatly under rated and the laws changed for the Goat or something. But everything else I mentioned remains the same. And that would further prove the higher torque numbers than HP since those cams typically had a better TQ/HP ratio than the vette cams.
Then where does the extra power come from as they are rated at 350? Unless the F-bidies were greatly under rated and the laws changed for the Goat or something. But everything else I mentioned remains the same. And that would further prove the higher torque numbers than HP since those cams typically had a better TQ/HP ratio than the vette cams.
12-18-2008, 04:56 PM
#73
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Goshen,In.
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That is news to me.Then where does the extra power come from as they are rated at 350? Unless the F-bidies were greatly under rated and the laws changed for the Goat or something. But everything else I mentioned remains the same. And that would further prove the higher torque numbers than HP since those cams typically had a better TQ/HP ratio than the vette cams.
Then where does the extra power come from as they are rated at 350? Unless the F-bidies were greatly under rated and the laws changed for the Goat or something. But everything else I mentioned remains the same. And that would further prove the higher torque numbers than HP since those cams typically had a better TQ/HP ratio than the vette cams.
12-18-2008, 06:20 PM
#75
11 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
wgat ever look at any cam card...any...most show lift in different ratios 1.5/1.6/1.7 blah blah blah....the duration stays the same...not like the rockers magicaly changew the lobe design....the ratio is increased and....boom you get more lift.,...
12-18-2008, 07:33 PM
#78
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Goshen,In.
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
mine doesn't show different ratios,just the 1.7..and i'm only talking about a degree or two difference..if you don't believe me,ask one of the experts on here...
12-19-2008, 12:58 PM
#79
11 Second Club
iTrader: (39)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NW Chicago Subs
Posts: 3,321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, at 0.050 lift (typical standard cam durration rating) the durration will be different with a higher ratio rocker since you will reach 0.050 lift sooner and drop below later.
12-19-2008, 02:11 PM
#80
11 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
all im saying the way you guys put it it looked like you were saying he gained... .15 % in duration as well as lift...
I hate trying to relay things over the net...
to the op nice #s sorry for jacking up your thread...
