Dyno Results: MS3, 5.3L Heads, Fast 92
02-04-2009, 02:18 PM
#44
ok....... lets not look at the "ms3" cam, lets look at the duration numbers 237-242 is rather large, and now you combine the fact that the heads flow well with fully ported fast 92/92 setup. people have made more power then this with slightly smaller cams on dynojets. also look at the graph the torque peaks very high like around 5700 rpm, which in turn reflects the high horsepower numbers. if dyno was just reading high, the torque peak would be lower in the rpm band as well as the power peak, but both curves would just be inflated beyond the norm. but that is my two cents, i didnt build this setup, i just tuned it, i have no stake in the this setup
02-04-2009, 03:55 PM
#45
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ok....... lets not look at the "ms3" cam, lets look at the duration numbers 237-242 is rather large, and now you combine the fact that the heads flow well with fully ported fast 92/92 setup. people have made more power then this with slightly smaller cams on dynojets. also look at the graph the torque peaks very high like around 5700 rpm, which in turn reflects the high horsepower numbers. if dyno was just reading high, the torque peak would be lower in the rpm band as well as the power peak, but both curves would just be inflated beyond the norm. but that is my two cents, i didnt build this setup, i just tuned it, i have no stake in the this setup
I know your number has a pretty large percentage correction to "read like a dynojet" but that has been proven to not be very accurate as the operators are in control. What percentage is yours adjusted to over the standard DD numbers?
02-07-2009, 09:18 AM
#52
02-07-2009, 04:15 PM
#53
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Come on bro those damn numbers are inflated, if you dont trap 122mph+ full weight (which you wont) then I am not a beleiver. Too many posts on this dyno thread section with these fake, inflated,way overly high power numbers with 0 track times to back them up.. That "supposedly" 502rwhp trickflow headed 90/90 yada yada car traps a wopping 92mph in the 1/8th. 11.80s would be a realistic goal to shoot for. Either all the dynos ive seen, been on, to, and used in person are way under rated or just straight up broken. Its about time some let the cat out the bag, here ya go.
02-08-2009, 11:40 AM
#58
Come on bro those damn numbers are inflated, if you dont trap 122mph+ full weight (which you wont) then I am not a beleiver. Too many posts on this dyno thread section with these fake, inflated,way overly high power numbers with 0 track times to back them up.. That "supposedly" 502rwhp trickflow headed 90/90 yada yada car traps a wopping 92mph in the 1/8th. 11.80s would be a realistic goal to shoot for. Either all the dynos ive seen, been on, to, and used in person are way under rated or just straight up broken. Its about time some let the cat out the bag, here ya go.
02-08-2009, 05:28 PM
#59
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here is something similar ..
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...tml?highlight=
https://ls1tech.com/forums/10-second...tml?highlight=
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...tml?highlight=
https://ls1tech.com/forums/10-second...tml?highlight=
