5.3 heads and ms3 cam #s
05-08-2009, 10:22 AM
#43
12 Second Club
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: West Seneca, NY
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The MS3/stg 2.5 heads/cam combo continues to impress me. Congrats on some killer number and I'm sure the nitrous numbers are going to be absolutely nasty (in a good way 
)
Regardless of what the dyno says, I bet the car goes at least 120mph in the 1/4 if it's full weight and will be well beyond 130mph on a 150 shot. These MS3/5.3 stg 2.5 cars are NO JOKE.
)Regardless of what the dyno says, I bet the car goes at least 120mph in the 1/4 if it's full weight and will be well beyond 130mph on a 150 shot. These MS3/5.3 stg 2.5 cars are NO JOKE.
05-08-2009, 05:04 PM
#48
TECH Senior Member
I was refering to a few poeple jumping saying that this amount of trq could not be harnessed by a 346. (no reference to the MS3)
I have seen it on a few combos and various dynos. That post is just 1 exemple.
Oh guess what, it is a reverse split cam
05-08-2009, 05:45 PM
#49
Clearing some things up here:
I have a TSP setup on my car and am extremely happy with it.
I don't care too much for the "hardcore" crowd, but they are spot on. That power from that setup is extremely unlikely, especially the laughable torque numbers. Jon, Jason, Matt at TSP - seriously, you must admit those numbers are not seen in your house from that combo! C'mon!
Finally, FBC lost their shop and dyno and are using a local ex Pro 5.0 guys Dynocom, that is WAAAAAAAAAAY off. My car has been on that dyno and another local Mustang dyno. I saw a stock 2003 Mustang GT put down 270rwhp on that Dynocom.
To the OP, I don't doubt that the car runs strong, but you may want to consider putting it on another dyno before posting the power numbers. Know that the results you have are far inflated compared to pretty much everyone else.
I have a TSP setup on my car and am extremely happy with it.
I don't care too much for the "hardcore" crowd, but they are spot on. That power from that setup is extremely unlikely, especially the laughable torque numbers. Jon, Jason, Matt at TSP - seriously, you must admit those numbers are not seen in your house from that combo! C'mon!
Finally, FBC lost their shop and dyno and are using a local ex Pro 5.0 guys Dynocom, that is WAAAAAAAAAAY off. My car has been on that dyno and another local Mustang dyno. I saw a stock 2003 Mustang GT put down 270rwhp on that Dynocom.
To the OP, I don't doubt that the car runs strong, but you may want to consider putting it on another dyno before posting the power numbers. Know that the results you have are far inflated compared to pretty much everyone else.
05-08-2009, 07:07 PM
#50
TECH Resident
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Working in the shop 24/7
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Hi Ed, Welcome back.
I was refering to a few poeple jumping saying that this amount of trq could not be harnessed by a 346. (no reference to the MS3)
I have seen it on a few combos and various dynos. That post is just 1 exemple.
Oh guess what, it is a reverse split cam
I was refering to a few poeple jumping saying that this amount of trq could not be harnessed by a 346. (no reference to the MS3)
I have seen it on a few combos and various dynos. That post is just 1 exemple.
Oh guess what, it is a reverse split cam
I *think* the boyz were talking about *this* combination touting 400TQ at 3400 RPM as being a little implausible with the list of parts... no more, no less...
05-09-2009, 12:54 AM
#53
TECH Senior Member
05-09-2009, 06:48 AM
#54
11 Second Club
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Bedford, IN
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The numbers do look high but what matters is how it runs at the track......He is going to be very disappointed in his times if he thinks his car really has that kind of power. I would take it to a creatable dyno. At least then he wont be surprised when it runs slower then expected.....
05-09-2009, 07:30 AM
#55
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
try scanning the dyno sheet in black and white. My scanner won't pick up my graphs in color either, but B&w it works fine!
crazy good numbers though, makes me feel better about my 6.0 which hasnt been to the dyno yet
crazy good numbers though, makes me feel better about my 6.0 which hasnt been to the dyno yet
05-09-2009, 03:58 PM
#59
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (36)
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I highly doubt you could get your ***** on the ground w/o stretching them a bit, but if thats what your into then ill give it a shot.
05-09-2009, 04:20 PM
#60
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Fresno, California
Posts: 1,985
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hell ya how it feels is important! Hell that's the reason we built these things isn't it? I don't race professionally, hell I don't even race at all, I built this thing so that I could have some fun, and I think most people start modding for the same reason.