Not All 224 Camshafts Are Equal... Engine Dyno Data INSIDE!!
To my knowledge, this is the most amount of actual testing done on cams. Little nuances between a degree here and a degree there really take shows the reality of the LS on the dyno versus the "truth" spoken by people that live and die by their copies of Dynomation.
I'm not sure why you're dissing on Texas speed, but it looks like you have an ax to grind.
To my knowledge, this is the most amount of actual testing done on cams. Little nuances between a degree here and a degree there really take shows the reality of the LS on the dyno versus the "truth" spoken by people that live and die by their copies of Dynomation.
I'm not sure why you're dissing on Texas speed, but it looks like you have an ax to grind.

Largest Stocking Distributor of LS-x Engines / CHECK OUT OUR NEW WEBSITE!
COMP - FAST - PACESETTER - DIAMOND RACING - EAGLE SPECIALTY PRODUCTS - CALLIES - COMETIC GASKETS
RAM CLUTCHES - MOSER ENGINEERING - KOOK'S HEADERS - ARP - GM BOLTS AND GASKETS - MSD - NGK
POWERBOND - ASP - AND MORE!
Our goal from this is very simple. We want to create camshafts that make better overall power across the useable rpm band. If going through 10 camshafts to rework each camshaft is what it costs to make overall better average power, then I'm willing to eat that expense everytime....
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Also, I posted the 3 LS1 cam comparo done by HotRod with Compcams. Their 224 was quite similar to this graph but without the dip in midrange. Even the stock cam did not have the dip in torque.
Thanks for the work but I think some folks would trade some Post 6300rpm Hp for a solid 20ft lbs of torque and no dip. Do you have a cam like that? And with about -10degrees of overlap at .050
Also, I posted the 3 LS1 cam comparo done by HotRod with Compcams. Their 224 was quite similar to this graph but without the dip in midrange. Even the stock cam did not have the dip in torque.
Thanks for the work but I think some folks would trade some Post 6300rpm Hp for a solid 20ft lbs of torque and no dip. Do you have a cam like that? And with about -10degrees of overlap at .050
The dip is due to something in the intake and/or exhaust trac that we haven't huted down yet, not the camshafts (every cam tested has it with the current intake and exhaust). Could be something as simple as collector length or taper, intake runner length and shape, etc. We'll be making some changes to find that issue and get rid of it, but for now it is not a variable in the testing and not a real concern.
To get -10º of overlap @.050" with a 224/224 you'd have to put it out on a 117LSA. Definitely doable, but not the norm by any means. I've never seen or heard of -4º of overlap failing an sniffer test even in California when the vehicle is equipped with CARB legal exhaust components (-4º is with a 114LSA).

Largest Stocking Distributor of LS-x Engines / CHECK OUT OUR NEW WEBSITE!
COMP - FAST - PACESETTER - DIAMOND RACING - EAGLE SPECIALTY PRODUCTS - CALLIES - COMETIC GASKETS
RAM CLUTCHES - MOSER ENGINEERING - KOOK'S HEADERS - ARP - GM BOLTS AND GASKETS - MSD - NGK
POWERBOND - ASP - AND MORE!
And I guess it's good to know that you have the money to test so many cams that are vitually the same. You should invest some of that in someone that actually knows how to spec a cam. Would be much cheaper that way, but then I guess it would be harder to pimp your new dyno.
It's good to see that you've decided to do cams that aren't so bad on drive train parts and are actually decent to drive.
And I guess it's good to know that you have the money to test so many cams that are vitually the same. You should invest some of that in someone that actually knows how to spec a cam. Would be much cheaper that way, but then I guess it would be harder to pimp your new dyno.
It's good to see that you've decided to do cams that aren't so bad on drive train parts and are actually decent to drive.
And I guess it's good to know that you have the money to test so many cams that are vitually the same. You should invest some of that in someone that actually knows how to spec a cam. Would be much cheaper that way, but then I guess it would be harder to pimp your new dyno.
Or either I can see threw the advertising BS and see that changing a cam no more than they did severals times is no big deal. Did it change the cam anywhere in the actual range you drive the car, no, not really. Isn't that what they claimed to be doing? Yeah they showed a few HP above 5700 rpm. But if that's where you were planing to run all the time you would get a bigger cam that makes power in that rpm range.
Have you ever bought a Sham-Wow?
While sometimes I find you humorous in your ball kicking you give some of these guys, but you're acting like a total dick in this thread. Find something else better to do than harrass a shop that's spent several thousands of $$$ on an engine dyno for R&D work. If you don't agree with the cam grinds they chose to work with, or their reasoning behind the post, then PM them and let them know about it.
You've made your point, don't post in this thread again or I'll just start deleting your replies.
To answer the question yes I'm perfectly happy with the testing on the 224 camshaft, and yes I'd do it again for a 10hp gain.
It's easy to act like you know exactly what something will do, but it's a entirely different thing when you can actually do the testing & help customers select a camshaft based off ACTUAL SIDE BY SIDE TESTING.
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com





