From cam only to heads/cam (with nitrous)
While the car was there I also decided to go for some more power. The previous setup was as follows:
2002 Z28 M6
LS1 lid
FAST 78mm TB
UD pulley
factory LS6 intake
Dynatech LT headers with high flow cats
Borla catback
230/236 .551/.551 112LSA cam
nitrous tune
heavy duty aluminum driveshaft
Moser 12-bolt with 4.10's and Eaton posi
17x9.5 chrome TTM wheels
Monster level 3 clutch
(The car also has a Harris Speed Works wet nitrous kit)
New Mods:
Trickflow 215's (milled to 59cc)
Yella Terra 1.8 rockers
Racetronix fuel pump
42# injectors
spool
They baselined the car after fixing the rear, but before the heads, etc and the car put down 389 rwhp and 353 rwtq. After the new mods it made 438 rwhp and 385 rwtq.

Once they tuned it to be safe on the nitrous it made 430 rwhp and 380 rwtq. The green line is on a 100 shot. In order to get the air/fuel anywhere close on the spray they had to go way big on the fuel jetting. The kit recommends a .028 jet and this graph shows it with the .034 jet. On the 100 shot it actually gained as much as 130-140 rwhp down low, but up top it looks like the air/fuel goes from 12.0 to about 11.2 or so and I gained 85 rwhp up top. I'm wondering if a very slightly leaner fuel jet would pick up any more up top.
The red line is on a 150 shot, but I didn't have a fuel jet size anywhere close and they had to put a .044 jet (kit recommends a .034, but it spiked way righ and they had to abort the run). The next size I had was .044 and you can see the air/fuel drop right out and then peg the meter low. Once I get a few more jets to play with and talk to the guys at HSW, I'll get it back on the dyno and see what kind of numbers it can really make on the 150.

The car runs great and feels strong as hell the few times I beat on it. I haven't sprayed it yet since the new mods, but that's on the way

My goals for the year are to really get my driving down and put up some decent numbers at the track.
Big thanks to Fran, and all the guys at RPM! The car came out great, pulls strong as hell, and they even picked me up at the train station when I got in to pick up the car. The shop is extremely clean and well organized and all of the cars being worked on there are being handled with care.
Last edited by ScreaminRedZ; Feb 11, 2010 at 08:32 PM.
That sound reasonable?
Trending Topics
I am going to be using .040 and probably around 58cc...might even go 57cc and put me around 12.1:1 and run a dual tune pcm for 93 street and 100 track...hmm decisions...
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Yeah, I think my cam went from around .551 with the 1.7's to .583 with the 1.8's. I figure if I get a cam with around .570 with 1.7's then I'll be right around .603 with my 1.8's.
I will say that I'm suprised that the torque was kind of low with this setup. I know alot of cam only cars make right around 380 and heads/cam cars are usually in the 400 range.
Tonight we went out and did the same thing a couple times. Every time the cars were dead even for the entire run. Obviously that means my car picked up some, but I didn't pull away at all, not even on the top end. I honestly expected that with a 40 hp gain it might be close at the start with my car pulling (at least slightly) up top.
Thoughts?
Last edited by ScreaminRedZ; Jan 23, 2010 at 07:33 PM.
I think a FAST will probably come before the cam, but I would say that the car will be getting a bigger cam at some point.
I am going to be using .040 and probably around 58cc...might even go 57cc and put me around 12.1:1 and run a dual tune pcm for 93 street and 100 track...hmm decisions...
But the next to nothing gain is what surprises me the most. I just don't understand how installing TFS 215s with rockers (coming from stock 241 heads and rockers) could net only a 1/2 to 1 car gain over where it was before.
And this is coming from a car that's notorious for making great power and backing up the numbers at the track (ScreaminRedZ's). Something seems wrong to me.







do it! lol 

