sayed_000

Hello guys

just want to share my cam only dyno sheet ..

mod's:
230/236 112+2
PRC springs .600
ls6 oil pump
paceseter LTs
ORY no-cats
Flowmaster CB
17" heavy Zr1
4.10 ratio
+Hp tuner

Stock/untouched:
stock slipping clutch!!
stock ls1 intake
stock 853 heads
Stock Lid and GM filter .
Stock Throttle Body
stock pushrods and rockers ...etc

tep: 31°C and Humidity 70%
fuel: 95 octane
Sorry for the image Quality ..



and now i have so many new mods ! (listed on my signature ) .. hopping for good numbers after adding Heads and a tune ..

same o'j

nice number for stock setup except cam

sayed_000

thanks man

MikeG

iTrader: (33)

Throw that clutch in and you'll see some real numbers.

sayed_000

already did

now i have monster stage 4 + low weight flywheel !!

spdygon

iTrader: (1)

have you dyno the car with new clutch? # look a bit low for the bolt ons and cam with 410 gears.
my car has about the same bolt on without cam, 410 gears and it dyno at 351rwh.

sayed_000

no not yet ..

i have to wait until i get a good set of heads .

WeathermanShawn

iTrader: (1)

Something seems odd about that dyno graph..Is it just my eyes or does the HP/TQ cross at 4750 RPMS?

It just seems a little low for a cam that big..Normally HP/TQ crosses at 5250 RPM. Again, sometimes these you charts will trick you, but if the x and y axis are off..

Maybe I am just losing it, but the graph does not seem to match the printed numbers. Am I reading this wrong?

kinglt-1

iTrader: (26)

I agree with WeathermanShawn, that graph is not right... Hp and tq should cross at 5250.

BlkBird2000

iTrader: (10)

Jeez. That is a poorly setup car!

BlkBird2000

iTrader: (10)

Look at the graph. the HP and TQ are not even on the graph.

BlkBird2000

iTrader: (10)

Because the HP and TQ are not equal? They have like a 50 hp/tq difference across the graph.

Reaperchild

Duude 1 thing I know about your Setup (BADLY TUNED) Period .... If i were you .... Get ur ECU/PCM to texas speed to tune it up for you ...... FOR ALL THE ABOVE COMMENT'S ... WE HAVEN;T SEEN A WELL TRAINED/STUDIED TUNER yet ... but Bahrain is working it's way up !!

Can't Wait To See you @ the Dyno =)

sayed_000

thanks for all your comments guys !!

i knew there is something wrong about the graph !!

JPH

iTrader: (2)

I would say you need to do some AFR adjustment?

WKMCD

iTrader: (2)

FWIW: I ran that cam on XE-R lobes in my 347. With good heads and ported 90/90 setup made 460-428 and was almost perfect driving. It's probably my favorite mid-size cam.

kinglt-1

iTrader: (26)

yup that too!

kinglt-1

iTrader: (26)

Multiquote works well, try it sometime!

sayed_000

just called the tuner back .. the numbers were right but the graph missed up while printing .

so gotta go back and print a new graph .

thanks guys for all your comments ..

WeathermanShawn

iTrader: (1)

Nothing personal, but I would not 'just take somebody's word for it'. What numbers are right?

See the numbers and graph do not match. Anytime I see that, I consider it a bad pull. As a few other posters have mentioned, it looks like your AFR is not ideal. So, even if the 'numbers are right', something is still wrong.

Personally, I would do another pull. Get your AFR dialed in at ~13.0, double-check the weather data, and do another run.

Its your car..you can do what you think is best, but a cam that size should be giving you higher numbers than what you have posted.

Good luck..