corvet786c

iTrader: (6)

Say on a dyno jet just as title says. What about 09-10 LS3's Are they basically the same? As far as Base model goes only 6 Speeds? Thanks.

Also what about Headers x pipe and exhaust tune and CAI. Thanks

edcmat-l1

iTrader: (10)

360-375ish stock. 410ish with headers and a tune.

Redcorvette2000

iTrader: (5)

Absolutely............

corvet786c

iTrader: (6)

What about with the new Edelbrock Supercharger kit?

Pntbll309

iTrader: (33)

1,000,000,000 spark plug horsepower.

senicalj4579

iTrader: (41)

The guy that did my dyno today said hes had 2 2010 stock camaros dynoed there but they were both auto. They dynoed at 310 which I was suprised. Sorry idk about the 6 spds though

Redcorvette2000

iTrader: (5)

Thats what i thought some of the automatic camaros were putting to the wheels

MauriSSio

the automatic Camaro is rated at 400hp at the flywheel which is one of the reasons they dont dyno very high.

desertLS1

iTrader: (8)

That's because the auto's are L99's not LS3's.
Just a short block LS3 with downgraded H/C/I...

Redcorvette2000

iTrader: (5)

Yeah i remember when the camaros first came out i drove an automatic 2ss and was like wtf!!! I had no idea there was a difference at the time....I would really like to drive a six speed just to "feel" the difference...I dont know why gm did that!

zacht

iTrader: (18)

woa....this thread really killed me on the new camaros... especially when you can buy a car for 1/4 the cost....12 years old....600lbs lighter (or whatever) and have the same horsepower....

(((come on GM...fords new mustang is doing well...and i hate saying that..., but then again, ford i commend you on finally making a mustang that ford guys can be proud of, congratulations, hopefully no more fly by's by mustangs...lol)

sorry i went off topic from the ls3 dynoing....

senicalj4579

iTrader: (41)

Very disapointing.

MauriSSio

i think they did it to add a few MPG's to avoid gas guzzler tax or whatever. The L99 uses different valves and lifters and cam to utilize the variable cam timing.Otherwise i think the Heads and intake are the same. Not sure why you felt such a big difference though, the LS3 car will only feel stronger on the top-end (higher RPMS) since the L99 has a comparable low and mid range torque curve AND better gearing.

Redcorvette2000

iTrader: (5)

Yeah the camaros are ok i would just make sure i got a six speed for sure and you are right on the fbodys! Gm will counter back at the mustang(Ford might have hit a homer but its our turn at the bat I just dont know why they punished the automatic so badly....Guy at works like i just bought a new camaro and its so fast...Im like "six speed or automatic"....Hes like "automatic" I just cringed and say "oh.......nice" But yes...again m6 ls3's 370ish stock....400-410ish lt's exhaust cai and tune

abbaskhan

my ls2 dyno'd 377 stock

WYD-01

iTrader: (2)

I have done two camaro's. L99 & LS3

The LS3 (manual trans) done 361 stock.
I didn't get a before dyno on the L99.

I put the exact same performance parts on both cars.

Kooks Longtube 1 3/4 headers coated
Kooks exhaust kit ( x-pipe) w mufflers
CAI (brand) Cold air intake.

After performance parts and tune :
LS3----418 rwhp
L99----365 rwhp

Let me say that disabling the torque management on the L99 made a world of difference. The car drives completely different. Remember these new auto tranny's rob alot of power.

Dyno tune done by RWTD on a dynojet

MauriSSio

must have been a texas dyno.....

ws6killer

iTrader: (4)

Not all shops on Texas do the tsp dyno trick bullshit!!

Redcorvette2000

iTrader: (5)

Yeah....That ls2 must be a FREAK !!!!!!!!