isnt 317 rwhp a little too high for a mostly stock car?
#1
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
so i got my car dynoed today, because i want a baseline for my future mods........i took it to a shop in phoenixville pa.....they have a subaru racing team and build a lot of vettes and race them.....it was an SAE corrected dynojet.....i asked him if these are real results not raised or anything, and he said that the way they have the settings that they dont jack the numbers up or anything, because they wanna know the numbers to give them an idea of how it will perform out on the track.....so my car is a 2000 ss.....stock ls1 M6 car....it has an slp lid, and the smooth bellow....he said that after looking at the AFR, that it looks like it has been tuned already....so if it has a lid, bellow and tune, can it really do 317 to the wheels? o and it has a flowmaster muffler.....
Last edited by Floorman279; 03-12-2012 at 03:49 PM. Reason: .......
Trending Topics
#13
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I made 308.5 rwhp at 5358 rpm and 328.5 lbs ft at 4255 on a Mustang dyno corrected to SAE J1349. I have a K&N FIPK and Cherry Bomb cat back with their Vortex muffler on my '02 M6 T/A.
When they say "it was SAE corrected", I'm guessing they are using SAE J607, which is typically about 5% higher than J1349. Most of the difference between the two is J607 is corrected to 60 degrees F, and J1349 is corrected to 77 degrees F. Nothing wrong with either, just good to know which standard is being used for future comparisons.
When they say "it was SAE corrected", I'm guessing they are using SAE J607, which is typically about 5% higher than J1349. Most of the difference between the two is J607 is corrected to 60 degrees F, and J1349 is corrected to 77 degrees F. Nothing wrong with either, just good to know which standard is being used for future comparisons.