LG Motorsports: New G5X3/114 Dyno Results (447.5RWHP / 413.4RWTQ)
#1
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Godspeed
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LG Motorsports: New G5X3/114 Dyno Results (447.5RWHP / 413.4RWTQ)
Finally added the LG 90 TB and FAST 90 Intake to my cam only G5X3/114 package. The results were 447.5 RWHP / 413.4 RWTQ - this was in complete street trim as I drive it everyday.
Just for grins next I did the Electric Water Pump setup (aka no belt) and did 458.1RWHP and 421.9RWTQ
Here is an overlay of the progression of dyno's with the addition of the TB/Intake.
Last here is a new video of the dyno.
447 Dyno Video
If you have any questions or would like more information about the package please let me know or feel free to call us at 972-272-7753.
Just for grins next I did the Electric Water Pump setup (aka no belt) and did 458.1RWHP and 421.9RWTQ
Here is an overlay of the progression of dyno's with the addition of the TB/Intake.
Last here is a new video of the dyno.
447 Dyno Video
If you have any questions or would like more information about the package please let me know or feel free to call us at 972-272-7753.
#3
Originally Posted by Nickn20
congrats awesome numbers, now add some fuel for the street
what water pump did ya put on there exactly?
what water pump did ya put on there exactly?
and whats wrong with the AF? looks pretty damn near perfect to me
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How does the low-end compare between these three cams:
- g5x-3
- g5x-2
- 224/224 .581 112 XE-R
I currently have the G5X-2 cam, but still woundering if I should go with something smaller for more low-end around town....do you have any graphs comparing the G5 cams to other smaller cams?
- g5x-3
- g5x-2
- 224/224 .581 112 XE-R
I currently have the G5X-2 cam, but still woundering if I should go with something smaller for more low-end around town....do you have any graphs comparing the G5 cams to other smaller cams?
#9
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Magred2001vette
How does the low-end compare between these three cams:
- g5x-3
- g5x-2
- 224/224 .581 112 XE-R
I currently have the G5X-2 cam, but still woundering if I should go with something smaller for more low-end around town....do you have any graphs comparing the G5 cams to other smaller cams?
- g5x-3
- g5x-2
- 224/224 .581 112 XE-R
I currently have the G5X-2 cam, but still woundering if I should go with something smaller for more low-end around town....do you have any graphs comparing the G5 cams to other smaller cams?
in the graphs you can see he is making 300rwtq at 2k rpm where the pulls are started...
i doubt you will see more low end on a smaller cam, and the top end won't be as good with a smaller cam other variables aside...
i would stick with the g5x2...its a good choice
there must be tons of g5x2 graphs...a search would help...
here is a thread
Last edited by mikemodano9c; 04-25-2004 at 02:17 AM.
#11
9 Second Club
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by kumar75150
Meziere electric water pump
and whats wrong with the AF? looks pretty damn near perfect to me
and whats wrong with the AF? looks pretty damn near perfect to me
the AF IS perfect for max power, problem is, when you take it to the street it will run leaner, I always shoot for about a half point richer than my target AFR, this is safer, and performs better on the street/track. ~12.6:1 AFR would be perfect, this when tuning on a dynojet 248, other dynos like a load bearing ones will simulate a very similar load to the street, so you can just tune for max power and be done with it.
#15
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Godspeed
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Nickn20
the AF IS perfect for max power, problem is, when you take it to the street it will run leaner, I always shoot for about a half point richer than my target AFR, this is safer, and performs better on the street/track. ~12.6:1 AFR would be perfect, this when tuning on a dynojet 248, other dynos like a load bearing ones will simulate a very similar load to the street, so you can just tune for max power and be done with it.
#17
FormerVendor
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Dallas/Wylie Texas
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Godspeed
The G5X-2 will have about 5-10 more on the low end, the G5X-3 has about 5-10 more on the top end. With my driving style the G5X-3 suits me just fine, the low end numbers aren't that bad. The best thing IMO abuot the 90mm TB setup is the amazing throttle response.
What we have seen is that the low end is almost exactly the same for te G5X-3 vs G5X-2 But the high end is better on the G5X-3. The other difference is that the G5X 2 on the same lobe center will idle slightly better.
Thanks
Lou G
LGM
#20
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Godspeed
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by algws6
Jeremy what exhaust are you running? I just bought an 04 Zo6 and am thinking of making a trip to go see youe guys.