2000 Camaro LS1/T56-AFR 205 heads, Polluter V2 Cam
#21
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I would probably be more interested in hearing what Tony Mamo says about it. If you research some AFR heads do not like a big split and added exhaust duration because of their strong exhaust flow. That's why just about every cam Tony specs out for those heads are single pattern cams and normally not very big. Again, just from my internet knowledge.
#22
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
That's what I thought but I saw a guy lose 30rwhp after installing a S60. Ive never seen that high of a loss with any rear.
#23
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: northern WI
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Well, I made 401rwhp on a Mustang and then 390 with a new tune on a Dynojet (no misprint). As odd as it sounds, the car picked up 2mph in a far worse DA with the new tune, so obviously the Dynojet is stingy and the myth that Mustangs "always" read lower isn't necessarily true.
Your rwhp and mph is about identical to mine. I make 390 and trap 116mph in a full weight car with a 6 speed and a 9". But, I have stock 241 heads, TB, intake etc. Only engine mods are MS3 cam and headers. With that said, I think you're leaving a bunch of power on the table having better heads like those AFRs.
Your rwhp and mph is about identical to mine. I make 390 and trap 116mph in a full weight car with a 6 speed and a 9". But, I have stock 241 heads, TB, intake etc. Only engine mods are MS3 cam and headers. With that said, I think you're leaving a bunch of power on the table having better heads like those AFRs.
#25
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Just to let everyone know, I spoke with Tick performance and told them my plans before purchasing a cam and they recommended the Polluter V2 cam. They also knew I was going with the AFR 205 heads. They are a leader in the aftermarket automotive industry and I wouldn't think they would lead me in the wrong direction, but everyone has their own opinion, and you are free to share that opinion. I want to either get the car to the track or on another dyno and see what the outcome will be. Time will tell. Thanks for everyone's input.
#26
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I don't think that cam is wrong for those heads at all, but from what Tony has said in other threads, and through many PM's he and I have had, he would not think that cam would be optimal for the AFR heads. With that said, each cam guru thinks a little, or a lot, differently when specking cams. You get guys like Tony Mamo, Martin Smallwood, Ed Curtis, Pat G, Kip Fabre, etc. you are going to get 5 different cam suggestions.
#28
FormerVendor
iTrader: (3)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I do not spec cams based on duration and LSA.
I spec them based on valve events.
I can have 2 cams, both with the same LSA and duration, but both have different ICL and ECL which will alter the valve events.
You could look at both cams and say they will perform exactly the same, yet they will not.
For example.
239/244 111+2
10.5
48.5
55.5
9.5
239/244 111+6
14.5
44.5
59.5
5.5
These cams will perform differently, but if I just told you they were both 239/244 111lsa you'd assume they wouldn't.
Tony has always said he likes 0-4 degrees of split. This cam has 5. Not much different?
Pat G's camshaft that made 500rwhp + in his own personal 4th gen was 236/240 111lsa. He had AFR 205 heads.
The restriction here is the cats and stock muffler he dyno'd it through.
If he had opened the cut-out there would of been an easy 15-20rwhp gain. Possibly more.
If a Mustang Dyno is truly operated correctly and the operator inputs the correct parameters to apply the correct amount of load on the dyno brake then the numbers will be 10-15% lower than a Dyno Jet.
I don't think his numbers are bad at all. Every dyno reads differently.
Last edited by Sales@Tick; 05-09-2014 at 10:30 AM.
#29
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
If you have the time here is my personal experience on the AFR 205 heads, Cam choice, and Tony's expert advice. Long story short I had 222/234 115+3 cam Stock AFR 205 heads made 451/403. Changed to a 235/235 113+3 cam and did some work on the heads and made 484/412 on a stock bottom end ls6. Then later on i switch to a stock bottom end Ls2 kept everything else the same and made 493/435. Full mods In sig.
Check out this Epic thread if you have time. https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...5-results.html
Check out this Epic thread if you have time. https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...5-results.html
Last edited by Bludevil415; 05-18-2014 at 01:30 PM.
#31
FormerVendor
iTrader: (3)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
If you have the time here is my personal experience on the AFR 205 heads, Cam choice, and Tony's expert advice. Long story short I had 222/234 115+3 cam Stock AFR 205 heads made 451/403. Changed to a 235/235 113+3 cam and did some work on the heads and made 484/412 on a stock bottom end ls6. Then later on i switch to a stock bottom end Ls2 kept everything else the same and made 493/435. Full mods In sig.
Check out this Epic thread if you have time. https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...5-results.html
Check out this Epic thread if you have time. https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...5-results.html
You also went to a bigger cam, I would highly doubt anyone would argue that adding 12 degrees of intake duration wouldn't gain power.
#32
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The heads were ported and milled.You are correct i went with a bigger cam.But i also went from a cam that was not designed to work with the Afr 205's to a cam that was.What are the specs on the polluter cam? Tony Mamo has stated his self that the Afr 205's likes single pattern cams. I am no expert by any means im just sharing my experience thats all.
![Offtopic](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies3/offtopic.gif)
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
#38
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Im sure they can make power from any cam above stock. Tony Mamo says they make the MOST power on single pattern cams. If you look at most of the cars making 470 and up on the afr 205 heads most of them have something in common and that is a single pattern cam.
#39
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...02rwhp-na.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...afr-205-a.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...-g5x3-cam.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/drag-raci...om-end-m6.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...460-420-a.html
#40
FormerVendor
iTrader: (3)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The uber famous Pat G AFR 205 combo that first made over 500rwhp with a stock bottom end LS1 engine had a 236/240 cam on a 111lsa.
LG used to use the AFR 205's a ton back in the day with there 234/242 112 and 114lsa G5X3 cam to make 480-500rwhp.
I look at valve events before I look at duration numbers. You can be led astray by just chasing duration figures and not calculating events.
LG used to use the AFR 205's a ton back in the day with there 234/242 112 and 114lsa G5X3 cam to make 480-500rwhp.
I look at valve events before I look at duration numbers. You can be led astray by just chasing duration figures and not calculating events.