LS1TECH - Camaro and Firebird Forum Discussion

Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

464 rwhp with a 224 cam and tsp 5.3 heads (Track update)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-28-2014, 12:25 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
mchdg86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Tulsa OK
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default 464 rwhp with a 224 cam and tsp 5.3 heads (Track update)
Went and got my car tuned last Friday and she put down 464 rwhp and 422 rwtq. Mods are mamo ported fast 102 with a ported ls2 throttle body, tsp stage 2.5 5.3 heads milled to 62 cc, 224/230 111+1 cam, arh 1-7/8 headers with catless x-pipe and corsa extreme cat back.


Last edited by mchdg86; 11-10-2014 at 05:25 AM.
mchdg86 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 05-28-2014, 12:32 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default
Damn good numbers right there with a small cam. Congrats.
Rise of the Phoenix is offline  
Reply Like
Old 05-28-2014, 12:48 PM
  #3  
TECH Junkie
 
1989GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,092
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default
I agree. Those are very good numbers. What transmission are you using? Was this on 91 octane gasoline?
1989GTA is offline  
Reply Like
Old 05-28-2014, 01:15 PM
  #4  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
mchdg86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Tulsa OK
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default
It's an MN12 six speed from a C5 Z06 and yes it was 91 pump gas.
mchdg86 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 05-28-2014, 04:21 PM
  #5  
TECH Junkie
 
1989GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,092
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default
Originally Posted by mchdg86
It's an MN12 six speed from a C5 Z06 and yes it was 91 pump gas.
Thank you. Very nice results.
1989GTA is offline  
Reply Like
Old 05-28-2014, 04:58 PM
  #6  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
mac62989's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: CT
Posts: 3,447
Received 28 Likes on 18 Posts

Default
Impressive numbers for a small cam and inexpensive heads. That ported FAST helps though.
mac62989 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 05-28-2014, 06:01 PM
  #7  
On The Tree
iTrader: (4)
 
1ta ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: AZ
Posts: 145
Received 9 Likes on 3 Posts

Default
Very good solid numbers. ^ there is the Ported Fast 102 showing it's advantages again

Lots of love for FRC vettes.
1ta ls1 is offline  
Reply Like

Trending Topics

Old 05-28-2014, 06:17 PM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
mchdg86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Tulsa OK
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default
Yeah I don't know how people can claim they lost power with a fast 102. There is no way my combo would even touch 450 with an LS6 intake.
mchdg86 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 05-28-2014, 10:40 PM
  #9  
TECH Resident
 
DarkblueTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: North Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default
Glad to see Brett doing well and still turning out good power with every car.
DarkblueTA is offline  
Reply Like
Old 05-29-2014, 05:55 AM
  #10  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
The Dragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Thumbs up
Originally Posted by mchdg86
Yeah I don't know how people can claim they lost power with a fast 102. There is no way my combo would even touch 450 with an LS6 intake.
DAMN RIGHT and ditto that!

Excellent numbers and efficient combo with inexpensive heads.

I get my car back Monday with a ported FAST 102
The Dragon is offline  
Reply Like
Old 05-29-2014, 10:15 PM
  #11  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
Mazzenger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts

Default
Nice numbers!
Mazzenger is offline  
Reply Like
Old 05-29-2014, 10:19 PM
  #12  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (42)
 
LsXRs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 328
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default
WOW! great numbers! would a ported 92mm reduce the results alot compared to 102mm not trying to hijack thread sorry.
LsXRs is offline  
Reply Like
Old 05-29-2014, 11:36 PM
  #13  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
mchdg86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Tulsa OK
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default
Originally Posted by LsXRs
WOW! great numbers! would a ported 92mm reduce the results alot compared to 102mm not trying to hijack thread sorry.
If I recall correctly I believe Tony Mamo has stated that a ported 102 is worth no less then 5 hp and no more than 10 hp over a ported 92.
Last edited by mchdg86; 05-31-2014 at 06:18 PM.
mchdg86 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 05-30-2014, 07:44 PM
  #14  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
ranmas2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Allentown, PA
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
Further proof you dont need no superbig cam to make great power!
ranmas2004 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 05-30-2014, 10:41 PM
  #15  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (42)
 
LsXRs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 328
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default
Originally Posted by mchdg86
If I recall correctly I believe Tony Mamo has stated that a ported 102 is worth no less then 5 hp and no more than 10 hp over a 92.
Thanks! btw this is with a ls1 or bigger engine?
LsXRs is offline  
Reply Like
Old 05-31-2014, 03:02 AM
  #16  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (21)
 
Kingc8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 4,558
Received 51 Likes on 42 Posts

Default
Nice numbers when are you gonna take it back to the track?
Kingc8r is offline  
Reply Like
Old 05-31-2014, 08:24 AM
  #17  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
mchdg86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Tulsa OK
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default
Originally Posted by LsXRs
Thanks! btw this is with a ls1 or bigger engine?
It's a stock cube ls1.

Originally Posted by Kingc8r
Nice numbers when are you gonna take it back to the track?
Hopefully with in the next couple weeks.
mchdg86 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 05-31-2014, 12:19 PM
  #18  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (21)
 
Kingc8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 4,558
Received 51 Likes on 42 Posts

Default
Nice those are pretty badass numbers.
Kingc8r is offline  
Reply Like
Old 05-31-2014, 12:45 PM
  #19  
Old School Heavy
iTrader: (16)
 
speedtigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,830
Received 61 Likes on 36 Posts

Default
PRC CNC'd factory casting heads are a lot better than most give them credit
speedtigger is offline  
Reply Like
Old 06-01-2014, 09:13 AM
  #20  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
License2Ill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default
Wow.
WOW.

Is it safe to say those heads are beating out 243s and 799s.? Would u be making less if running those instead? I keep seeing awesome figures with them but yet their flow numbers posted seems to show less airflow than bigger heads. Must be the old jedi air velocity trick. Who's cam?
License2Ill is offline  
Reply Like



Advanced Search
Quick Reply: 464 rwhp with a 224 cam and tsp 5.3 heads (Track update)


Reply Closed Thread Share

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:15 AM.