H/C Dyno sheet Thoughts?
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 388
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte NC
H/C Dyno sheet Thoughts? 02 Trans AM < 50k mile stock bottom end. 6spd 3:42 stock rear
Stock untouched LS6 Intake and TB
42lb Injectors
1 3/4 Kooks with custom 3" FM Merge Y through stock catback
TFS CNC 205's out of the box 11.5:1
BTR Stage 3 NA
What's next? Thoughts?
AFR @ WOT 12.4
SAE Smoothing at 5
Stock untouched LS6 Intake and TB
42lb Injectors
1 3/4 Kooks with custom 3" FM Merge Y through stock catback
TFS CNC 205's out of the box 11.5:1
BTR Stage 3 NA
What's next? Thoughts?
AFR @ WOT 12.4
SAE Smoothing at 5
Last edited by brobinson216; Feb 7, 2016 at 02:05 PM. Reason: Added a bunch of junk
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 388
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte NC
Thanks, Fortunately I have a drag car so this is just a play toy for the street.
Yes a well known stingy Dynojet.
I was thinking a set of 4.30's and call it done. Will this setup benifit that much going to a Fast?
I was thinking a set of 4.30's and call it done. Will this setup benifit that much going to a Fast?
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 388
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte NC
There's a brand new QP 9 inch laying in the gargage ready to go in. Problem is I'm liking the 3:42 but it wants MORE gear.
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power
Verdad Gallardo
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die
Verdad Gallardo
There's a lot more left in this combo for sure, but those numbers are great. 1 7/8" headers, a better exhaust setup, and a FAST/FAST setup will yield you another 35 to 40 HP I bet.
11 Second Club
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 15
From: South Florida
The first thing I would do is get that stock catback off. You may like the sound/tone & sleeperness of stock tips though. I believe a fast will help power, across the board, no matter. The easier choice being the 92 as you can use the stock fuel rail & don't have to grind. The 102 will help more, with power, but needs aftermarket fuel rails & it may contact the top of the water pump/grinding.
Seems you're making good power as is.
11 Second Club
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 15
From: South Florida
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 388
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte NC
I've got multiple 9" center sections from other cars laying around. I would really like to keep the 7.5 due to the fact that I will most likely never put a set of tires on this car.
I agree the 4.10 will most likely fit the bill. Appreciate the insight!
To be honest I think there is as well, some just in the tune itself. Swear I bought this thing to have a fun car to drive back and forth from work. I'm debating about a catback now. Thanks for the positive feedback.
Yes, the lower ratio will make it a tire shredder for sure. But it wants more gear and the 3:73 won't cut it. It's tuned pretty well and still has some slight surge around ~1200.
To be honest I built this motor trying to prove what I already knew. The gains with the smaller runner heads vs. > 210 runner heads would be on par being a 346 ci. I found that out in 2005 with one of my z06's and a set of Dart 205's. Yielding max HP was not in the original scope simply put it's a fun streetcar. Now it's time to see what it really has in it.
I will order a fast 92 combo and see what that does for it.
Thanks for bringing this back to my wallet attention. Apreciate it
I agree the 4.10 will most likely fit the bill. Appreciate the insight!
If this is just a street car, with street tires, 4.30 or 4.10 may be a little too much. It all boils down to what you want. Thinking, with that power, with 4.xx gears, & no sticky tire, it will be spin city.
The first thing I would do is get that stock catback off. You may like the sound/tone & sleeperness of stock tips though. I believe a fast will help power, across the board, no matter. The easier choice being the 92 as you can use the stock fuel rail & don't have to grind. The 102 will help more, with power, but needs aftermarket fuel rails & it may contact the top of the water pump/grinding.
Seems you're making good power as is.
The first thing I would do is get that stock catback off. You may like the sound/tone & sleeperness of stock tips though. I believe a fast will help power, across the board, no matter. The easier choice being the 92 as you can use the stock fuel rail & don't have to grind. The 102 will help more, with power, but needs aftermarket fuel rails & it may contact the top of the water pump/grinding.
Seems you're making good power as is.
To be honest I built this motor trying to prove what I already knew. The gains with the smaller runner heads vs. > 210 runner heads would be on par being a 346 ci. I found that out in 2005 with one of my z06's and a set of Dart 205's. Yielding max HP was not in the original scope simply put it's a fun streetcar. Now it's time to see what it really has in it.
I will order a fast 92 combo and see what that does for it.
If this is going to be a street only car 4.10s wouldn't be bad. That's what I've got and I made similar power and they work great. As for at the track I'm way up in 4th on a 26" tire on motor. On a 150 shot on a 28" tire I'm 6800ish.
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 388
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte NC
Ported Fast 92mm and Fast 92mm TB installed and took it out for a drive this am.
Holy **** that woke this car up. The throttle response is so much crisper and responsive. To those who have the H/C and considering the Fast, make the move now as you will not be disappointed.
Install went smooth, now its time to get some data logs and make some adjustment.
The TPS is sticking around .04% at idle, so that's the primary area of concern right now.
It will be May 31st before it can go back to the dyno. Maybe I'm in the wrong buisness?
Holy **** that woke this car up. The throttle response is so much crisper and responsive. To those who have the H/C and considering the Fast, make the move now as you will not be disappointed.
Install went smooth, now its time to get some data logs and make some adjustment.
The TPS is sticking around .04% at idle, so that's the primary area of concern right now.
It will be May 31st before it can go back to the dyno. Maybe I'm in the wrong buisness?
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,845
Likes: 255
From: Coast of San Mateo County Between Pacifica & HMB
I tell people all the time with 5.7 & HC and Headers they are leaving
20-25+ RWHP and just as importantly 15-20+ lb ft through pretty
Much their whole curve 2500-5500,6500 RPM not to mention
MUCH crisper throttle response on the table with LS6 intake & TB
compared to a well ported FAST 92 & 90/92 TB let alone the
FAST 102! or 383" LOL
Good Job!
Enjoy!
20-25+ RWHP and just as importantly 15-20+ lb ft through pretty
Much their whole curve 2500-5500,6500 RPM not to mention
MUCH crisper throttle response on the table with LS6 intake & TB
compared to a well ported FAST 92 & 90/92 TB let alone the
FAST 102! or 383" LOL
Good Job!
Enjoy!
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 388
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte NC
I tell people all the time with 5.7 & HC and Headers they are leaving
20-25+ RWHP and just as importantly 15-20+ lb ft through pretty
Much their whole curve 2500-5500,6500 RPM not to mention
MUCH crisper throttle response on the table with LS6 intake & TB
compared to a well ported FAST 92 & 90/92 TB let alone the
FAST 102! or 383" LOL
Good Job!
Enjoy!
20-25+ RWHP and just as importantly 15-20+ lb ft through pretty
Much their whole curve 2500-5500,6500 RPM not to mention
MUCH crisper throttle response on the table with LS6 intake & TB
compared to a well ported FAST 92 & 90/92 TB let alone the
FAST 102! or 383" LOL
Good Job!
Enjoy!
11.5 comp and the right head combination for the CI used. This dyno is far from generous. It was well thought out, not my first rodeo.
Last edited by brobinson216; Mar 5, 2016 at 03:56 PM.
11 Second Club
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 15
From: South Florida
Nice looking engine!! Is that a catch "box"?
I see you went with the fast TB & have a idle issue. A lot of people do. I made this thread after finding myself.https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...ast-92-tb.html
I see you went with the fast TB & have a idle issue. A lot of people do. I made this thread after finding myself.https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...ast-92-tb.html