horsepowerenginering 434 dyno numbers 562/507 !!!!!!!
#44
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Salisbury,MD
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by eviltwins
How the heck does a cam with 260 degrees of duration and heads that flow 350 CFM's make peak power at 6400?
#47
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Murrieta Ca.
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nice numbers and all, but my friends budget 408 makes about the same power for a hell of a lot less money.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/424587-new-sd-tune-150-shot-dyno-numbers.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/424587-new-sd-tune-150-shot-dyno-numbers.html
#50
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Salisbury,MD
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ATLHwyRacer
LOL someone has been Grave digging.
Ha ha, that would be me. Sorry, getting kind of excited about the motor so figured i'd dig up what I could find
#55
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Alvin Texas
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 2c5s
Nice numbers and all, but my friends budget 408 makes about the same power for a hell of a lot less money.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=424587
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=424587
#56
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Murrieta Ca.
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by U LUZ
i didnt notice that your friend had 3.90 gears like i have, ask him to take out the 3.42s and put 3.90 gears in it it will loose almost 20rwhp that would put mine up to 585rwhp...and 530rwtq...belive it or not...not to knock it that is good power for a 408 ....
Lets see, he has a stock waterpump compared to your electric w.p., he has 25' timing and 91 octane and totally maxed out inj's.. He also has less head flow and what appears to be less cam. And 3.42 to 3.90 ain't 20 rwhp. No need to justify the money you spent............... I was just mak'n a point. Have a nice day.
#57
Shorty Director
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by 2c5s
Lets see, he has a stock waterpump compared to your electric w.p., he has 25' timing and 91 octane and totally maxed out inj's.. He also has less head flow and what appears to be less cam. And 3.42 to 3.90 ain't 20 rwhp. No need to justify the money you spent............... I was just mak'n a point. Have a nice day.
#58
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
Originally Posted by VINCE
No need to criticize good numbers or what someone paid. Line the cars up and see who is faster. You will find out my almost 2 year old FMS setup is faster and I paid much less than all of you. Just kidding...
#59
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Murrieta Ca.
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by VINCE
No need to criticize good numbers or what someone paid. Line the cars up and see who is faster. You will find out my almost 2 year old FMS setup is faster and I paid much less than all of you. Just kidding...
#60
Shorty Director
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by 2c5s
Sorry you feel that way, but reality is not criticism. Once again, have a nice day.