Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

stock Z - 1st dyno

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-07-2007, 07:06 PM
  #1  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
vatechguy3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Yorktown, VA
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default stock Z - 1st dyno

well, i've had the camaro for 1 month now and finally got with my buddy, left work a little early and headed to the dyno.

the car is a bone stock, including crappy paper air filter, 2001 camaro z28 M6 with 51k miles.

in case you can't read the numbers on the bottom of the graph, 304 hp and 331 ft/lbs.

i made 3 pulls and all numbers were consisent!

what do you guys think??

spend the money on suspension and better tires and wait on motor mods??

tony
Attached Thumbnails stock Z - 1st dyno-dyno3.jpg  
Old 02-07-2007, 08:24 PM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (14)
 
caviness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Liberty,NC
Posts: 698
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

looks about right for stock car.dynoed mine tonight to 2000 model ss right now got QTP lt and LID only on ls1 it did 331 HP and 350 TQ.looks like you are ready to start bolting stuff on.
Old 02-07-2007, 08:53 PM
  #3  
Staging Lane
 
sk8co's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

and thats engine not rwhp? right?
Old 02-07-2007, 09:15 PM
  #4  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
SSNISTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Of course it's RWHP....
Old 02-08-2007, 06:11 AM
  #5  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
vatechguy3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Yorktown, VA
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

no, that RWHP!!!!

thats why i'm happy. i was figuring about 280 hp and 300 ft/lbs.

tony
Old 02-10-2007, 10:58 AM
  #6  
Launching!
iTrader: (7)
 
Reidonly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by vatechguy3
the car is a bone stock, including crappy paper air filter, 2001 camaro z28 M6 with 51k miles.

in case you can't read the numbers on the bottom of the graph, 304 hp and 331 ft/lbs.
Nice! I have an 02 Z and did 315whp/330wtq at a dyno day. The first 2 pulls were 304 and like 306, taking a break between pulls. We told them to hotlap it after the 2nd pull and it jumped up to 315 on the 3rd pull lol.
Old 02-11-2007, 02:13 AM
  #7  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Denom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 619
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Wow those are impressive numbers for a stock car. It's actually on the high side. I dunno if you should really opt for suspension parts. It all depends on what you want to do. I tried to make my car an all around performer, but I gotta admit that it still doesn't handle all that well.
Old 02-11-2007, 07:17 AM
  #8  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
Red99TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Topeka, KS
Posts: 2,423
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Good numbers and very strong torque down low. FWIW there's nothing wrong with a paper filter...that's what I use and plenty of other people on here too. I don't see the point in spending $50 for a K&N to gain a HP.
Old 02-11-2007, 07:48 AM
  #9  
TECH Resident
 
damon_Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Picatinny Arsenal, NJ
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Red99TA
Good numbers and very strong torque down low. FWIW there's nothing wrong with a paper filter...that's what I use and plenty of other people on here too. I don't see the point in spending $50 for a K&N to gain a HP.
I also don't see why anybody would want to spend the time in cleaning their air filters when it's so much easier just to replace them. Yeah, it might cost more money in the long run to keep on buying paper air filters, but at least there's no chance that you'll get excess cleaning oil onto your MAF.
Old 02-11-2007, 07:50 AM
  #10  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
02 BLK WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Glen Carbon, IL
Posts: 1,689
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Red99TA
Good numbers and very strong torque down low. FWIW there's nothing wrong with a paper filter...that's what I use and plenty of other people on here too. I don't see the point in spending $50 for a K&N to gain a HP.
I use a paper filter still. While it's great to have a filter that can be cleaned and reused, but I don't want the hassle of oil making it's way onto my MAF and causing problems.
Old 02-11-2007, 08:42 AM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (23)
 
99zman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,422
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

its not really to tuff to spray some maf cleaner on the maf connections.
Old 02-11-2007, 09:05 AM
  #12  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (9)
 
mcamarols1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 989
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

wow u guys made this into a paper filter vs. k&n filter thread, good numbers bro, i made 333whp and 350wtq w/ LT,ORY, Lid, through a 12bolt and 3.73's
Old 02-11-2007, 10:01 AM
  #13  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
Red99TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Topeka, KS
Posts: 2,423
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mcamarols1
wow u guys made this into a paper filter vs. k&n filter thread, good numbers bro, i made 333whp and 350wtq w/ LT,ORY, Lid, through a 12bolt and 3.73's
That's my fault...I didn't mean to stir the pot. I don't even have a MAF anymore so the oil theory isn't why I use paper.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:27 AM.